Why did Jamie get the technical near the end?
- Thread starter Tiger Paul Lives
- Start date
His head blew off which is normal in close games and his hair piece ended up on the court and got stuck on the officials foot.
He was warned just a couple minutes earlier. Got a bench warning.
At that point, he *HAS* to stay in the box.
I guess, but I'm sorry, unless he is egregiously outside the box, you don't call it. I think the FSU crowd baited them into it.
Oh well, we could have Leonard Hamilton as a coach, who literally fell asleep as his team could have probably used him to call a TO.
Coach can't call a live ball time out anymore. Not sure if an inbounds play is live but I think it is.
Great point. Next time people want to complain about Dixon's coaching ability, Hamilton has coached in college for nearly 30 years. He has 2 SWEET SIXTEENS! And if Jamie left we'd be lucky if someone of Hamilton's caliber was an option for us. Of course considering if Hamilton did that at Pitt he'd be an underachiever, I think it's pretty clear Jamie has done better than most would've here.
It had to be over the previous out of bounds play. Jamie was wanting a review but ref wouldn't give it to him. Ref had it out for him after that
I ran it back on my DVR. Not the best angle but I'm pretty sure Jamie was right and Kersey was wrong on the deflection. That was purely a "I'll show YOU who's the boss!" technical.
I thought the same thing. You can't tell for sure, but there is a reasonably good chance that the ball did not hit out of bounds before the FSU player caught it. For the life of me I cannot imagine why they did not look at it.
On the other hand, you still can't be out of the coaches box about a minute after you get warned about it.
Well, the refs this season have warned Jamie almost every game and the zebra made a point of pointing to the scorer's tabe after warning him today.
I've been wondering about reviews lately. In the NC State/Duke game today, just seconds after and out of bounds call the refs made the decision to go review it. The past few games before today I noticed some very questionable calls regarding who the ball went out off of. Yet, in none of those games did they ever review any of those instances. I just don't understand how they're allowed to decide to just not review plays that are in question like that.
I don't know when the plays that you are talking about occurred, but in college basketball they can only use replay to review out of bounds plays in the last two minutes of regulation or in overtime.
Try nearly 40 years...He was an assistant for Joe B. Hall at UK in 1978.And he may have been there before then.
I think Jamie told the refs they suck. Which they did. They can't handle the truth.
That would explain it. I wasn't sure because I thought I remembered them reviewing plays before that weren't in the last 2 minutes. The one reviewed in the Duke game yesterday though I honesty don't even remember already when in the game it was.
I was only mentioning his time as a head coach. Valid point, but Jamie didn't get credit for the wins the first 2 Sweet Sixteens as an assistant. My only point was in nearly 30 years as an NCAA head coach, Leonard Hamilton has 2 Sweet Sixteen appearances. That's it, that's the furthest he's ever advanced as head coach. This is Jamie's 13th season, he has 10 tourney appearances in 12 years, 2 ended in the Sweet Sixteen, and he has the Elite Eight team. This is in about half the time as Hamilton.
I prefer listening to Hillgrove while watching on tv...Hillgrove basically stated during the technical foul that that particular official has a vendetta against Jamie and this was not the first time he has screwed Jamie over...I was surprised to hear Hillgrove state this but Groat backup Hillgrove's comment....do not remember officials name.
Of course Groat, like several posters on this board, thinks that every ref in America has a vendetta against Pitt and Jamie Dixon and goes out of their way to screw us on a regular basis.
I guess the advantage of listening to Hillgrove while watching the game on tv is that you can still see what's going on even when Hillgrove and Groat have no idea.
That wasn't what he was talking about. In the Pitt game, yes, the play at the end could have been reviewed, and I don't understand why the officials refused to do so.
Bryan Kersey. He gave Dixon a T against Syracuse as well.
Nonetheless, I don't believe any ref has a vendetta against any coach per se.
For having such a vendetta against Dixon, he called a lot of fouls on FSU in the second half. We were in the double bonus before they were in the bonus.
Lorenzo Romar at UW is another guy who has a lengthy career and zero to show for it. He's in his 14th season and only 6 NCAA appearances, last in 2011.
Honestly if you take the top coaches in the game, the future hall of famers, they all clearly have better resumes than Jamie. But take a look at the rest of the coaches and there's a few who have done more in March, but Jamie has about as good of a resume as any of those other coaches. Having the best winning percentage in the best conference of all-time is pretty impressive.
I thought the T was for an "illegal substitution" on Pitt at the time. It was pretty questionable to me, and I think more a case the ref getting JD because of him pointing out the error on the out of bounds on Luther that didn't look like OB.
