Why has the line moved down to UCLA -3.5?
- Thread starter ratking17
- Start date
It’s a reaction to Slovis hitting the portal.
So we gained 3 points by losing our starting QB?
Actually I think you are probably right.
Seeing many -3’s now. Books are way more reactionary in Bowl games where no one knows who’s playing and who’s not and will move their numbers decisively off rumors to avoid getting burned.
I thought I had really good inside information on this one as a business associate of mine has a son who plays for UCLA, and I assumed he would know of any opt outs for the Bruins. Unfortunately the son, who is a seldom used special teams player has decided to transfer to NAU and won’t be going to El Paso. He told his dad that he doubted DTR would play and said Charbonnet and Bobo were undecided, but that was a couple weeks ago and is dated information by now.
I thought I had really good inside information on this one as a business associate of mine has a son who plays for UCLA, and I assumed he would know of any opt outs for the Bruins. Unfortunately the son, who is a seldom used special teams player has decided to transfer to NAU and won’t be going to El Paso. He told his dad that he doubted DTR would play and said Charbonnet and Bobo were undecided, but that was a couple weeks ago and is dated information by now.
I have absolutely no guess on this game at all regardless of the line…
I just would like one more request to kick UCLAs ass… and win the f@cking footballing game!!!!
Other than that I’m good
Seriously though… we’re due … overdue
I just would like one more request to kick UCLAs ass… and win the f@cking footballing game!!!!
Other than that I’m good
Seriously though… we’re due … overdue
Really it is a head scratcher. Pitt doesnt play well in bowls, we have our top defensive players out, Is Izzy even playing?
Similar threads
