Well, that's another team that we'll be outmatched against for at least the next couple years.
We've always been outmatched against them; we are 6-21 all time and 5-13 since joining the ACC. What more could Wade do that his predecessors haven't?Well, that's another team that we'll be outmatched against for at least the next couple years.
Those cold numbers say a lot. You are what your record says you are.We've always been outmatched against them; we are 6-21 all time and 5-13 since joining the ACC. What more could Wade do that his predecessors haven't?
Bring in top tier talent and coach them up to compete at the top of the ACC, which hasn't happened for a while at NC State.We've always been outmatched against them; we are 6-21 all time and 5-13 since joining the ACC. What more could Wade do that his predecessors haven't?
When I found the all-time Pitt vs NC State record, I did a deeper dive and looked at our all-time records vs the other teams in the ACC. We have a losing record against them all. Clemson is particularly bad (1-13, if I recall correctly); VA is ugly; Dook; UNC; Syracuse; UMiami: it goes on and onBring in top tier talent and coach them up to compete at the top of the ACC, which hasn't happened for a while at NC State.
We had better players this year but were not a better team the day we played them, and we've beat them consistently over the last few years once the program climbed out of the smoking crater Stallings left it in. I expect that trend to change now.
Yep. That was my takeaway too. We need better coaches in this league. Of course, can he coach when everyone else is paying players too?Finally a good hire for the ACC
He wasn't impressive at LSU and I thought he was overrated. But McNeese has been exceptional for their conference. They played Alabama to a very close game with a small roster, I think I was unfair and he's good.Yep. That was my takeaway too. We need better coaches in this league. Of course, can he coach when everyone else is paying players too?
As long as it is that we're stuck with Capel, I kind of agree that it won't do us much good to raise the quality of the conference. But I still hold out a naive optimism for some days far in the future when Capel is a memory and we play in a postseason tournament more than once a decade. So on the possibility of that imagined future time, I think it's not great if the ACC falls too low on the national scene. Pitt's longest run of sustained national relevance (at least in my lifetime) came during a span when the Big East was particularly competitive, lots and lots of highly accomplished teams in that time and I don't think those things are totally unrelated.I don't pull for the ACC as a whole to improve like some of you do. We're stuck with Capel, and NIL is what it is, so if other teams improve that just means we're going to lose more.
Like, what good would it have done us being in the SEC this year? Is it better to go 11-21, opposed to 17-15? I'm not buying this "iron sharpens iron" mentality.