ADVERTISEMENT

WRESTLING- 2/14/14 - Pitt vs Edinboro - MATCH THREAD ......

125 - Zanetta (Pitt) dec Mines (Edinboro) 10-9 .... Pitt up 3-0 ....

Big win for Zanetta as this match was considered a toss up match.
 
133 - Schopp (Edinboro) dec Mack (Pitt) 1-0 .... match tied 3-3 .....

Schopp is ranked #2 in the country.
 
141 - Port (Edinboro) dec Bright (Pitt) 8-2 .... Edinboro up 6-3 ....

Port is ranked #1 in the country..... he dominated the match.
 
149 - Habat (Edinboro) maj dec Racciato (Pitt) 10-2 .. Edinboro up 10-3...

Habat dominates the Pitt freshman.
 
157 - Greisheimer (Edinboro) dec Sheptock (Pitt) 8-1 ... Edinboro up 13-3*

nm
 
165- Morelli (Pitt) dec Burnett-Davis (Edin) 4-3 !!! ... Edin up 13-6...

Morelli almost taken down but unbelievably converts it into a winning take down late in the match ..... huge win for Pitt !
 
174- Wilps (Pitt) maj dec Jennings (Edin) 19-5 ...... Edin up 13-10*

nm
 
184 - Thomusseit (Pitt) dec Avery (Edin) 4-1 .... match tied 13-13...

2 matches to go.
 
197 - Bonaccorsi (Pitt) dec Pickett (Edin) 8-2 ... Pitt up 16-13 ....

comes down to the 285 match ..... James of Edinboro ranked #17 and Tasser of Pitt ranked #19.
 
We prob lose on total pts.
Posted from wireless.rivals.com[/URL]
 
Edinboro wins 17-16 .... gets one point on criteria ......

that didn't announce what criteria gave them the point.... will have to wait and see.
 
Re: Edinboro wins 17-16 .... gets one point on criteria ......

It was total points. Tyler's major wasn't enough to overcome the Mikey major & the Bright near major.
 
singregardless or anyone ..... can you list the order of criteria used....

to determine the point to break the tie .......total points is how far down the list ???

This post was edited on 2/14 8:46 PM by goalieman
 
Re: singregardless or anyone ..... can you list the order of criteria used....

I actually have total pts 50-50. So what criteria did they use?
-no team penalties
-no falls
-to tech falls
-even on majors

Am I right?
Posted from wireless.rivals.com[/URL]
 
Re: singregardless or anyone ..... can you list the order of criteria used....

I meant no tech falls.

If wilps could have got one more pt this would all be moot. Oh well.
Posted from wireless.rivals.com[/URL]
 
Re: singregardless or anyone ..... can you list the order of criteria used....

Could the final match been 4-0 with the 4th pt being riding time, or was that the 3rd pt?
Posted from wireless.rivals.com[/URL]
 
Re: singregardless or anyone ..... can you list the order of criteria used....

I think Wilps won by less than 14 pts.
 
Re: singregardless or anyone ..... can you list the order of criteria used....

2 or 3 of the matches I added riding time points, may have been off on the score but not sure..... they were a little vague on a couple of the final scores in matches based on riding time and they never announced what criteria gave Edinboro the deciding point.
 
Re: singregardless or anyone ..... can you list the order of criteria used....


Originally posted by thom67:
I think Wilps won by less than 14 pts.
That could be as the final score on the video was 18-5 but I added a point for riding time to Wilps score ..... maybe they had already added it and the final was 18-5 which would give Edinboro one more total point then Pitt.
 
Yes. Tyler won 18-5 with riding time.

I thought we would have to win at 149 to win it. Instead Mikey probably wrestled the worst of anyone tonight. I have a suspicion that PJ has some sort of injury because he didn't move the way he usually does. I didn't expect Morelli to win at 165.

I think total points is the 4th criteria. Had that been tied I think we win the 5th criteria as they had more stalling calls.
 
Thanks mike 412 and thom67 .......

for clarifying the Wilps score ..... Therefore, Edinboro had one more total point then Pitt ...... can't get much closer of a match !
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT