Where’s the part where finding a few diamonds in the rough over the years (like every other P4 team does) translates to a lot of winning?
I mean who cares if Dooz, or Chryst, or Wanny, or WLAT, or whoever finds a few gold nuggets in a shit pile here and there, unless it’s translating to a lot of good football?
You need about 44 good players on one roster, or 30 good ones and a couple of great ones to field a legit top 25 football team.
Correct. Every P4 team in America has players as good or better than many of the ones above. Regardless, and without bringing up the same arguments as to why it is statistically better to recruit 4/5 stars than 2/3 stars, I'll just say:
1. The lifeblood of a Narduzzi team is its D line, so hopefully they can keep this core intact
2. No idea how you fix this O line in one season, but it feels like the guys already on the roster need to get a lot better
3. Should be in contention for the best LBers in the country if they all come back; hopefully that distinction means something to them and entices them to do such
4. Wide receiver recruiting under Narduzzi had been inexcusable, and they better hit the transfer jackpot on somebody
www.cbssports.com
