It deals with points scored against possible points. Based on shots taken, 3 points shots, and free throws. Over 50% is obviously best.
We had 2 players very efficient yesterday.
Ish 6 for 11 from the field, 2 for 2 from 3, and 7 of 7 at the line. Possible 22 +2 +7 for 31, and he scored 21. 68%
Zack 3 for 5, 1 for 1, 4 of 4, 10 + 1 + 4 for 15, he scored 11. 73%
Others who contributed, but far less offensive efficiency:
Cam 7 of 15, 0, 3 of 7, 30 + 0 + 7, 37, he had 17. 46%
Amsal 6 for 13, 2 for 6, 0 of 1, 26 + 6 + 1, 33, he had 14. 44%
Beebah 3 for 9, 1 for 5, 4 of 5, 18+ 5 + 5, 28, he had 11, 40%
Pitt as a team, 25 of 58, 6 for 17, 18 of 24, 116 + 17 +24, 157, we scored 74, 46%.
We were efficient enough to beat a bad team, but need to up our offensive efficiency to beat good teams. Winning the boards 37 to 32 also helped greatly.
We had 2 players very efficient yesterday.
Ish 6 for 11 from the field, 2 for 2 from 3, and 7 of 7 at the line. Possible 22 +2 +7 for 31, and he scored 21. 68%
Zack 3 for 5, 1 for 1, 4 of 4, 10 + 1 + 4 for 15, he scored 11. 73%
Others who contributed, but far less offensive efficiency:
Cam 7 of 15, 0, 3 of 7, 30 + 0 + 7, 37, he had 17. 46%
Amsal 6 for 13, 2 for 6, 0 of 1, 26 + 6 + 1, 33, he had 14. 44%
Beebah 3 for 9, 1 for 5, 4 of 5, 18+ 5 + 5, 28, he had 11, 40%
Pitt as a team, 25 of 58, 6 for 17, 18 of 24, 116 + 17 +24, 157, we scored 74, 46%.
We were efficient enough to beat a bad team, but need to up our offensive efficiency to beat good teams. Winning the boards 37 to 32 also helped greatly.
