I agree. I will try to work w it but before I knew who said what and it was easier to respond to a particular comment.it's a lot more cumbersome IMO. And with this format there is no way to really get a reply across that anyone will notice or read, unless they bother to read the whole thread.
This is a significant downgrade.
it's a lot more cumbersome IMO. And with this format there is no way to really get a reply across that anyone will notice or read, unless they bother to read the whole thread.
This is a significant downgrade.
I doubt it--as you know, he's a man of extraordinary refinement and taste.Question is, does Tom Izzo approve???
I agree. I will try to work w it but before I knew who said what and it was easier to respond to a particular comment.
Yeah, this is 100% wrong. it has every feature thread view has and a lot more. It auto quotes so you know who the reply is too. It automatically loads the page to the last post you viewed. You don't have to keep clicking to load each message. It now auto embeds videos and tweets. Just because it's not coded for 1999 anymore doesn't mean it's not user friendly. EVERY modern message board aside from rivals got rid of thread view years ago. If it wasn't user friendly it wouldnt have survived. Give the boards a chanceIt is simply not as user friendly
Hang in there "thebadby2" ..... as you get used to it, the new format will become more friendly.it's a lot more cumbersome IMO. And with this format there is no way to really get a reply across that anyone will notice or read, unless they bother to read the whole thread.
This is a significant downgrade.
Me too, I hate it.Hang in there "thebadby2" ..... as you get used to it, the new format will become more friendly.