Anybody want to read the Barr interview?

[NCPitt]

I prefer reading to listening. That's one reason I don't watch videos. Here is the entire Barr interview with CBS. Its a really good and compelling read.

William Barr interview: Read the full transcript

 

[joeydavid]

I prefer reading to listening. That's one reason I don't watch videos. Here is the entire Barr interview with CBS. Its a really good and compelling read.

William Barr interview: Read the full transcript

Like his fictional account of the Mueller report to Congress; this is nonsense, especially coming from an AG who should know better.

 

[BPKY]

Time to subpoena Mueller!

 

[TempleBAPittMPA]

Time to subpoena Mueller!

Go for it!

 

[JGregor]

I prefer reading to listening. That's one reason I don't watch videos. Here is the entire Barr interview with CBS. Its a really good and compelling read.

William Barr interview: Read the full transcript

The only reason Barr is AG is because he is dishonest and a total Trump supporter.

 

[NCPitt]

The only reason Barr is AG is because he is dishonest and a total Trump supporter.

If you even read the interview, can you point to a single statement that you can prove was dishonest?

 

[pittbb80]

If you even read the interview, can you point to a single statement that you can prove was dishonest?

I need to read the Barr or Mueller report when Rach has the scoop

 

[BPKY]

Go for it!

Waiting on the Dems to issue one. You realize they control the committee, right?

 

[BPKY]

If you even read the interview, can you point to a single statement that you can prove was dishonest?

Read the transcript? We don't need no stinkin read the transcript...

 

[paulbl99]

Waiting on the Dems to issue one. You realize they control the committee, right?

The GUTLESS WONDERS.......

Say When. Let’s do this......Trump is going to get to the source of this unprecedented crime against our Republic perpetrated by Cardinal Comey , the Commie Brennon and that old stanky liar Clapper

 

[joeydavid]

If you even read the interview, can you point to a single statement that you can prove was dishonest?

Barr states that the report proved “this whole idea that the Trump was in cahoots with the Russians is bogus.” In fact, the Mueller report notes that it did not even try to establish whether the campaign was “in cahoots” with Russia. The report states that it “applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of ‘collusion.’”

The report in fact finds extensive evidence that Trump was in cahoots with Russia. His top campaign officials took a meeting with a Russian agent promising them help from the Russian government. Trump asked Russia on camera to hack his opponent’s emails, and they carried out a hacking attempt that day. Trump was pursuing a lucrative, no-risk business deal requiring Russian government approval during the campaign and lying about it, making him vulnerable to blackmail by Russia. Sharing an explosive secret that could destroy your campaign in order to potentially collect a massive payoff from a party that you know is doing illegal things to help you is the definition of being in 'cahoots'.

 

[BPKY]

Barr states that the report proved “this whole idea that the Trump was in cahoots with the Russians is bogus.” In fact, the Mueller report notes that it did not even try to establish whether the campaign was “in cahoots” with Russia. The report states that it “applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of ‘collusion.’”

The report in fact finds extensive evidence that Trump was in cahoots with Russia. His top campaign officials took a meeting with a Russian agent promising them help from the Russian government. Trump asked Russia on camera to hack his opponent’s emails, and they carried out a hacking attempt that day. Trump was pursuing a lucrative, no-risk business deal requiring Russian government approval during the campaign and lying about it, making him vulnerable to blackmail by Russia. Sharing an explosive secret that could destroy your campaign in order to potentially collect a massive payoff from a party that you know is doing illegal things to help you is the definition of being in 'cahoots'.

I think you need to learn the definition of "cahoots". Let's look at what you list here as cahooting.

His top campaign officials took a meeting with a Russian agent promising them help from the Russian government. Is listening to an offer mean you're in cahoots? No.

Trump asked Russia on camera to hack his opponent’s emails, and they carried out a hacking attempt that day. Did Russia only hack on that day? No. And it was a rhetorical statement by Trump anyhow. Plus, it wasn't done in secret. Honestly, this is the zaniest of collusion examples that the left has ginned up.

Trump was pursuing a lucrative, no-risk business deal requiring Russian government approval during the campaign and lying about it, making him vulnerable to blackmail by Russia. This has absolutely nothing to do with being in cahoots. Negotiating a business venture does not equate to being in cahoots to fix an election.

Sharing an explosive secret that could destroy your campaign in order to potentially collect a massive payoff from a party that you know is doing illegal things to help you is the definition of being in 'cahoots'. I honestly have no idea what you're talking about on this one.

I don't see any cahoot, but I do think that your continued grasping at straws is the very definition of a hoot.

ca·hoots
/kəˈho͞ots/
Learn to pronounce
noun
INFORMAL

1. colluding or conspiring together secretly.
   "the area is dominated by guerrillas in cahoots with drug traffickers"
   synonyms: in league, colluding, in collusion, conspiring, conniving, collaborating, hand in glove, allied, in alliance
   "politicians accused of being in cahoots with the Mafia"

 

[ONGB]

No Americans charged with anything to do with Russian coordination, collusion

I think you need to learn the definition of "cahoots". Let's look at what you list here as cahooting.

His top campaign officials took a meeting with a Russian agent promising them help from the Russian government. Is listening to an offer mean you're in cahoots? No.

Trump asked Russia on camera to hack his opponent’s emails, and they carried out a hacking attempt that day. Did Russia only hack on that day? No. And it was a rhetorical statement by Trump anyhow. Plus, it wasn't done in secret. Honestly, this is the zaniest of collusion examples that the left has ginned up.

Trump was pursuing a lucrative, no-risk business deal requiring Russian government approval during the campaign and lying about it, making him vulnerable to blackmail by Russia. This has absolutely nothing to do with being in cahoots. Negotiating a business venture does not equate to being in cahoots to fix an election.

Sharing an explosive secret that could destroy your campaign in order to potentially collect a massive payoff from a party that you know is doing illegal things to help you is the definition of being in 'cahoots'. I honestly have no idea what you're talking about on this one.

I don't see any cahoot, but I do think that your continued grasping at straws is the very definition of a hoot.

ca·hoots
/kəˈho͞ots/
Learn to pronounce
noun
INFORMAL

1. colluding or conspiring together secretly.
   "the area is dominated by guerrillas in cahoots with drug traffickers"
   synonyms: in league, colluding, in collusion, conspiring, conniving, collaborating, hand in glove, allied, in alliance
   "politicians accused of being in cahoots with the Mafia"

You said it best but as many prosecutors have stated, the WORST example of Trump conspiring with Russia was the obviously joking reference to Russia to hack her emails.

Hillary did the same thing a few weeks ago to China about releasing Trumps tax info. Everyone knew it was a joke.
Then a day or 2 later, someone got ahold of Trumps info from that 10 year time frame.

But I didnt see any cons running around with their hair on fire accusing Hillary of conspiring with China because of it.

People are nuts.

 

[BPKY]

No Americans charged with anything to do with Russian coordination, collusion


You said it best but as many prosecutors have stated, the WORST example of Trump conspiring with Russia was the obviously joking reference to Russia to hack her emails.

Hillary did the same thing a few weeks ago to China about releasing Trumps tax info. Everyone knew it was a joke.
Then a day or 2 later, someone got ahold of Trumps info from that 10 year time frame.

But I didn't see any cons running around with their hair on fire accusing Hillary of conspiring with China because of it.

People are nuts.

Haha, a bunch of cons probably were but the Praetorian Guard Press wouldn't report.

Still....FOX didn't report on it either, sooooo.....guess your are right. how bout dat.

People fighting religious crusades usually are nuts. Maester Aemon said it best, "Nuts is the death of logic."

 

[paulbl99]

No Americans charged with anything to do with Russian coordination, collusion


You said it best but as many prosecutors have stated, the WORST example of Trump conspiring with Russia was the obviously joking reference to Russia to hack her emails.

Hillary did the same thing a few weeks ago to China about releasing Trumps tax info. Everyone knew it was a joke.
Then a day or 2 later, someone got ahold of Trumps info from that 10 year time frame.

But I didnt see any cons running around with their hair on fire accusing Hillary of conspiring with China because of it.

People are nuts.

Look, he loves to make up sh!t same as others here.

Where are the gutless wonders they elected into the HoR...bring it on!!!!

Mueller brought nothing because legally he had nothing.....and Mueller created a perfect Figure 8 claiming he did not have evidence that Trump did not commit a crime.....he sure is better than Souf at that game.

 

[NCPitt]

Barr states that the report proved “this whole idea that the Trump was in cahoots with the Russians is bogus.” In fact, the Mueller report notes that it did not even try to establish whether the campaign was “in cahoots” with Russia. The report states that it “applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of ‘collusion.’”

The report in fact finds extensive evidence that Trump was in cahoots with Russia. His top campaign officials took a meeting with a Russian agent promising them help from the Russian government. Trump asked Russia on camera to hack his opponent’s emails, and they carried out a hacking attempt that day. Trump was pursuing a lucrative, no-risk business deal requiring Russian government approval during the campaign and lying about it, making him vulnerable to blackmail by Russia. Sharing an explosive secret that could destroy your campaign in order to potentially collect a massive payoff from a party that you know is doing illegal things to help you is the definition of being in 'cahoots'.

Nice try except that very same mueller report concluded that nothing inappropriate could be proven. So your post fails to meet the standard of proof of dishonesty.

 

[joeydavid]

Nice try except that very same mueller report concluded that nothing inappropriate could be proven. So your post fails to meet the standard of proof of dishonesty.

1. That's not what the report states.

2. Your point is what makes Trump's numerous act of obstruction worth the risk.

 

[paschuler1970]

I prefer reading to listening. That's one reason I don't watch videos. Here is the entire Barr interview with CBS. Its a really good and compelling read.

William Barr interview: Read the full transcript

Sorry NCPitt but at 1:43 of the link you sent I stopped. When Barr said something like our team disagreed with Mueller's team after we reviewed.... What two groups disagreed with each others view? Sorry I hate listening to this.....Who's right or wrong, I'm past that. I feel eventually it will all come out.

 

[NCPitt]

1. That's not what the report states.

2. Your point is what makes Trump's numerous act of obstruction worth the risk.

It’s exactly what the report states. I provided a picture highlighting that conclusion in an earlier thread.

 

[NCPitt]

Sorry NCPitt but at 1:43 of the link you sent I stopped. When Barr said something like our team disagreed with Mueller's team after we reviewed.... What two groups disagreed with each others view? Sorry I hate listening to this.....Who's right or wrong, I'm past that. I feel eventually it will all come out.

The written transcript was below the video. I don’t watch videos.

 

[paschuler1970]

The written transcript was below the video. I don’t watch videos.

I'm not disputing what you say. I know you do your own research. However, this whole Mueller investigation has been spun by too many people. I don't have enough desire to read the Mueller Report. So I'll wait for some reasonable outcome. I now stop reading all this stuff and go out and work in my garden. I mislabeled several of my plants and planted too many White Knight eggplant plants. Not a real screw up but I was planting the seeds while reading some of these threads....Yeah I can't chew gum and walk at the same time.

 

[NCPitt]

I'm not disputing what you say. I know you do your own research. However, this whole Mueller investigation has been spun by too many people. I don't have enough desire to read the Mueller Report. So I'll wait for some reasonable outcome. I now stop reading all this stuff and go out and work in my garden. I mislabeled several of my plants and planted too many White Knight eggplant plants. Not a real screw up but I was planting the seeds while reading some of these threads....Yeah I can't chew gum and walk at the same time.

I didn’t and won’t read the mueller report either. This was about the cbs Barr interview. It’s a much shorter read.