But as president baron stated, paterno is innocent...
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8c8b...president-decries-new-joe-paterno-allegations
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8c8b...president-decries-new-joe-paterno-allegations
Barron covered up for Jameis Winston. He has zero credibility.But as president baron stated, paterno is innocent...
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8c8b...president-decries-new-joe-paterno-allegations
The Barron sees the impending doom of lawsuits et al coming that will potentially negate the insurance payout to penn state to cover the payments to victims. If he agrees that 1971 abuse was known by Joe, he negates the insurance payment. He's going to rely on "he said; she said" to refute Joe's knowledge in 1971. But just like Sandusky in 1998, Joe had an employee title and position in the university, making the university liable for his actions and.....psu is going to have to pay the damages settlement WITHOUT the insurance paying or reimbursing psu for it.
And if Glazer unseals the deposition on Victim A in 1971 ~ that is going to hit the media like the Starr Report pornography did with Bill Clinton. Nobody listened to Clinton; And nobody is going to listen to Joe or any Paterno or any cult member regarding the 1971 rape.
Very good point, this will either unite all of Penn State or gives ammo to take out those that kept blaming the Old Guard Trustee Leadership.How can Barron be so certain? He wasn't even there.