Can I just sit quietly in this forum while grabbing my knees in the fetal position?
Well done.Can I just sit quietly in this forum while grabbing my knees in the fetal position?
I'm guessing it's in meltdown mode over there? Who would have thunk it that hiring a career jabroni wouldn't result in more success?
I checked it out earlier and it's hilarious over there, albeit in a tragic, morbid way.
Best thread? That this was all intentional to diminish Pitt BB so they can tear down the Pete and build an on campus stadium. That is Nittany like loony logic.
I don't follow basketball much anymore, but showing a classy, beloved, successful, nationally respected coach the door for someone who's basically the complete opposite seemed dumb.
one of the common threads over the years is both Pitt football and basketball fans have gotten to enjoy the Pitt administration blow up their beloved programs with stupid, short sighted decisions.......
For basketball.........righting the ship will now fall to the very questionable capabilities of Ms Lyke, who by all accounts from those with a knowledge of the sport, left two or three more deserving candidates on the board in the search for a new wrestling coach.
In a few short months Ms Lyke will face a protest in the form of 7000-8000 Pitt basketball fans refusing to send in their season ticket orders.
And football certainly is not in the clear. It will not be long before Narduzzis name is mentioned with bigger programs. I (we) always suspected that day will come.....I had hoped that our administration would recognize a successful football program is worth sustaining.
Anyone here feeling confident??
Pitt's perception in the eyes of the basketball community has been quite damaged. It was no surprise we had to make a desperation hire because of the WTF eyebrows that were collectively raised about what was going on. It will take a long time to rectify this debacle.
Was it donors or the previous AD?
It's honestly shaking up to be every bit as bad as the de-emphasis of the football program in the '88 except Gottfried was no Jamie Dixon.
At least basketball should be easier to fix since rosters are so much smaller.
Yeah, that's the million $ question. Depends who you talk to. Probably both.
If you think it is easy to fix basketball, look how long programs like Penn State, DePaul, and Rutgers have sucked. It's not easy to find top coaches, nor get them to a place like Pitt. Everyone is looking for them.
Not easy, just easier than football. But I'm just guessing.
Has a program ever gone from the top to the bottom so quickly? That's a question for the hoops fans.
I remember seeing stuff in the P-G or Trib about the donors demanding Dixon get shown the exit.
Difficult situation if true.
I would agree that a rebuild can be done faster because of the numbers. It's easy to have one hit wonders and such, but much more difficult to sustain success of the long term like Pitt had for 15 years. Pitt will have to start over now.
Pitt deserves credit at the time for increasing Dixon's pay when he had success. What happened under the scenes however? Why did Jamie's recruiting quite suddenly plummet through the subbasement after the Birch thing? Did the admins get angry or cold feet?I would agree that a rebuild can be done faster because of the numbers. It's easy to have one hit wonders and such, but much more difficult to sustain success of the long term like Pitt had for 15 years. Pitt will have to start over now.
Pitt deserves credit at the time for increasing Dixon's pay when he had success. What happened under the scenes however? Why did Jamie's recruiting quite suddenly plummet through the subbasement after the Birch thing? Did the admins get angry or cold feet?
Adams was an inside job, so to speak ... a guy literally in the middle of nowhere that JD got due to connections in NZ. But by then he was hardly getting anyone else from more typical recruiting sources. Birch seemed the catalyst, or anti- catalyst as it were. It was a high profile recruit, the guy was getting legit playing time (if not exactly blowing any socks off). He gets disenchanted and leaves right in the middle. The assistant that got him is soon gone too. The fate was similar of all of JD original assistants.Was wondering the same thing. The basketball drop off started immediately following the two biggest recruits coming onboard--Birch and Adams.
That probably didn't help (though part of the issue was Adams being a one, ok two, trick pony, which he still largely is). However the problems with recruiting and development were already happening. Getting Adams was a total fluke due to where he came from. He was a fine one for sure, but Jamie and staff were mostly whiffing at everything else by that time (which manifested itself in what we had the last couple years, i.e, not much).I thought Jamie poisoned the recruiting well with the way he used - or didn't use Adams. Adams barely touched the ball unless he got a rebound. What center would come to Pitt after seeing a center oozing with potential barely ever touch the ball...
Just my theory after how maddening it was to watch that...
Go Pitt
Some of you seem to conflate the seperate issues of allowing Jamie to walk and hiring Stallingrad. The big problem was the actual HIRE and not so much getting rid of Jamie. Pitt could have hired literally any other qualified or partially qualified candidate and that coach couldn't have done worse. Brandon Knight would have even been better. This is the real reason Barnes got out if Dodge. He knows Stallings was a pitiful hire and didn't want his D1 career to be over, which it would have been had he remained.
What's also troubling is that Gallagher didn't have the sense or forsight to see this coming.
Dixon was a good coach in the beginning of his tenure; in the rough and tumble Big East.
But when he had to change to accommodate the ACC he could not. I will not forget his deer in the headlights look when Pitt to the ACC was announced.
Remember he was making big bucks with a supportive (embarrassing supportive) administration.
His answer to the situation was to continue his poor recruiting habits coupled with micromanaging every aspect of "HIS TEAM". How the heck do you justify some of the moves that he made, such as hiring Smoke (joke) etc, etc.
We can continue to blame Stallings and that blame is probably well founded given the mass exodus of players and recruits.
But let's not lose sight of the hot mess that Dixon left Pitt to deal with.
I agree that the squandering of Jamie would have been forgivable with a good replacement hire.Some of you seem to conflate the seperate issues of allowing Jamie to walk and hiring Stallingrad. The big problem was the actual HIRE and not so much getting rid of Jamie. Pitt could have hired literally any other qualified or partially qualified candidate and that coach couldn't have done worse. Brandon Knight would have even been better. This is the real reason Barnes got out if Dodge. He knows Stallings was a pitiful hire and didn't want his D1 career to be over, which it would have been had he remained.
What's also troubling is that Gallagher didn't have the sense or forsight to see this coming.
I agree that the squandering of Jamie would have been forgivable with a good replacement hire.
But it shouldn't have ever gotten to that.
It would have been much better to salvage the Jamie era. Just a small amount of stimulus funds to upgrade his assistants, line the pockets of recruits and their coaches/handlers, relax the chokehold that had led to the preposterous expulsion of players who smoked a joint.
Because Jamie was a BRAND NAME. He was no K or Calipari but he had built a measure of gravitas. His name was probably was why Pitt got into the tournament his final year; the team really wasn't worthy.
The Pitt administrations (plural) are such freaking idiots.
it can be done, but it is not for the faint of heart. You have to get involved in the AAU cesspool which is a game Pitt doesn't seem to want to play.
Does the blame lie most on the big money donors, BOT, AD, or all of the above?Perfect example of not smart.
And really, this has been rehashed endlessly. There is a side I don't respect, at all, and I've made that clear and will leave it at that. They are getting EXACTLY what they deserve now. Sadly, everyone is getting dragged along.
No, the two are related.Some of you seem to conflate the seperate issues of allowing Jamie to walk and hiring Stallingrad. The big problem was the actual HIRE and not so much getting rid of Jamie. Pitt could have hired literally any other qualified or partially qualified candidate and that coach couldn't have done worse. Brandon Knight would have even been better. This is the real reason Barnes got out if Dodge. He knows Stallings was a pitiful hire and didn't want his D1 career to be over, which it would have been had he remained.
What's also troubling is that Gallagher didn't have the sense or forsight to see this coming.