Just find a way to make Heinz 'look better' for the short term. Its demoralizing perception wise most of the time as is. Its the first thing that catches your eye like pitt has thrown in the towel. Maybe hire an illusionist?
Just find a way to make Heinz 'look better' for the short term. Its demoralizing perception wise most of the time as is. Its the first thing that catches your eye like pitt has thrown in the towel. Maybe hire an illusionist?
I would say 35+. Many were in the clubs and underneath to escape the wind and cold, get food, beverages or whatever. They were still there, just not in their seats. Not making excuses for those not there, but just the way it is.
College football also wasn't as popular then as it is now. Some numbers for you:
Texas Darrell K Royal Stadium
1970s capacity: 77,000. Current: 100,0000
Beaver Stadium - PSU
1970s capacity: 60,000. Current: 106,000
Bryant Denny stadium - Alabama
1970s capacity: 60,000. Current 101,000
Doak Campbell Stadium- FSU
1970s capacity: 51,000. Current: 79,000.
You just compared Pitt to four massive state institutions. I'm also curious what the enrollments at those schools have done since the 70s as well? Have they increased at the same rate?
Why not compare Pitt attendance to other urban non-state schools in professional sports towns? Boston College, Temple, Georgia Tech, Cincinnati,Tulane, Miami, Northwestern, TCU, SMU, etc.
At least be intellectually honest enough to compare apples to apples.
Most of those on your list of similar schools have football programs we should aspire to being a better program than year in and year out. Do you want to continue to settle for the mediocrity we have had since the mid-1980s?
On the other hand, we don't need a 100,000 seat stadium; but we should have capacity similar to or slightly larger than the current Heinz capacity to accommodate the extra demand for tickets when we are playing as a perennial top 10 team and playing a Penn State or a Clemson or similar opponent that brings large numbers of fans. Think big and don't settle for mediocrity!
Get rid of the yellow seats. That is way more realistic (and way simpler) than all this other stuff.
None of us will settle for mediocrity, and I think the present staff aspires to get to an elite level. But the poster intended to say that attendance needs to be compared to those in a similar situation. City schools with am NFL team is what Pitt is similar to. We shouldn't expect to compete with attendance from the rural, large enrollment schools. Noteworthy is that over a period of time, Pitt has competed favorably with those similar schools, and Miami, for instance, won NCs with lower attendance, so it doesn't mean that mediocrity is what we need to accept.Most of those on your list of similar schools have football programs we should aspire to being a better program than year in and year out. Do you want to continue to settle for the mediocrity we have had since the mid-1980s?
On the other hand, we don't need a 100,000 seat stadium; but we should have capacity similar to or slightly larger than the current Heinz capacity to accommodate the extra demand for tickets when we are playing as a perennial top 10 team and playing a Penn State or a Clemson or similar opponent that brings large numbers of fans. Think big and don't settle for mediocrity!