Here's Allreds exact words when asked if her client FORGED the yearbook.
Still waiting on that independent examination lol.
On “The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer” on CNN, Allred evaded the issue. Blitzer asked, “Can you say flatly to our viewers right now, Gloria, that the signature, what he wrote in that yearbook in 1977, according to her, can you say flatly that was not a forgery?”
Her answer?
“Well, all I’m saying is we will permit an independent examiner of the writing to look at exemplars of [the] former judge…we will allow all of this to be asked and answered at the hearing.”
Really, that is all you can say? Who are representing at that time. But it got worse:
“Well, all I’m saying is we’re not denying, we’re not admitting, we’re not addressing. We will not be distracted, and we will pursue a just result for our client.”
This is not some gotcha, unforeseen moment. Not only is this the document Allred paraded around before the press but it is a controversy that has been stewing for days.
Allred only would promise to have analysis of the signature “done in a professional setting to the extent possible. That’s the only setting in which people can testify under oath and that’s what we think is most important.”
Which she still hasn't done.
Sounds like she's got nothing to hide to me.
Thank God Wolf Blitzer and Gloria Allred understand the meaning of forgery better than Barrister Gregor and a few other dullards here.
