Yes; I do know:
(1) These were the first games of the season.
(2) Hard to evaluate whether comparisons of what teams did vs should have done vs opponents has any meaning.
Nevertheless, per Sagarin's computer--
(A) Pitt should have beaten Kent by 27.69 and won by 31.00
(B) Cincinnati should have beaten Towson by 31.71 and won by 18.00.
(C) Towson had a lower rating than Kent by about 1.5 points
Per Box Scores--
(C) Cincinnati gave up ~440 yds of offense to Towson vs Pitt giving up only ~220 yds to Kent
(D) Cincinnati generated ~650 yds of offense vs Towson vs Pitt's generating ~550 yds vs Kent.
All of this MIGHT "suggest" Pitt is better than Cincinnati and should win next week's game?
(1) These were the first games of the season.
(2) Hard to evaluate whether comparisons of what teams did vs should have done vs opponents has any meaning.
Nevertheless, per Sagarin's computer--
(A) Pitt should have beaten Kent by 27.69 and won by 31.00
(B) Cincinnati should have beaten Towson by 31.71 and won by 18.00.
(C) Towson had a lower rating than Kent by about 1.5 points
Per Box Scores--
(C) Cincinnati gave up ~440 yds of offense to Towson vs Pitt giving up only ~220 yds to Kent
(D) Cincinnati generated ~650 yds of offense vs Towson vs Pitt's generating ~550 yds vs Kent.
All of this MIGHT "suggest" Pitt is better than Cincinnati and should win next week's game?