ADVERTISEMENT

Congratulations your the next Head Coach of the University of Pittsburgh Men’s Bb Program

Pretty sure the buyout is a lot less than $15 million and that Pitt paid a lot less than what most thought they would for Stallings. I really don't think money will be a huge factor. The biggest issue is the huge hole the new coach will have to dig out of.
They got a break because they got Stallings for cause . JC is only losing that’s on the people who hired and extended him . If I was JC I’m not reducing my buyout one cent .

Are you serious? If Pitt pays the full buyout (let’s say for argument sake 15 mill, which they won’t come close to paying) what up and coming coach WOULDNT wanna come to Pitt? You guys realize they can go get another job after Pitt pays these buyouts that pay them more money then they’ll spend in their lives?

Literally hundreds of head coaches nationwide would take their chance at an ACC job that they can hopefully turn around or get paid a handsome buyout if they can’t. This isn’t hard to figure out
Any highly sought person in the job market regardless of profession normally has more than one option for employment, sure someone will take the money , but is he who you want ? Is the Pitt job a a highly desirable job ? Are you furthering your career by going to a school in Pitts situation ? The guys you want will have options and I doubt that Pitt is at the top of anyone’s list other than BK . Pitt taking a chance and throwing millions at an up and comer after the KS and now JC fiascos takes deep pockets and a lot of balls .
 
Pitt fans love to talk about how Pitt never has any money to do anything even though the football program got a $20M donation before this season even kicked off. Somebody gave Pat Narduzzi $20M dollars when his best season was winning eight games five years ago. It’s turned out to be a good investment, though!

Do people realize how much richer some people got during the pandemic? There are people out there with unexpected amounts of money that’s burning a big hole in their pocket.
They’re lining up in front of Heathers office as we speak ! Lol !
 
They got a break because they got Stallings for cause . JC is only losing that’s on the people who hired and extended him . If I was JC I’m not reducing my buyout one cent .


Any highly sought person in the job market regardless of profession normally has more than one option for employment, sure someone will take the money , but is he who you want ? Is the Pitt job a a highly desirable job ? Are you furthering your career by going to a school in Pitts situation ? The guys you want will have options and Imdoubt Pitt is at the top of anyone’s list other than BK . Pitt taking a chance and throwing millions at an up and comer after the KS and now JC fiascos takes deep pockets and a lot of balls .
How do you know they have nothing for cause here? The buyout will be significantly lower than you think
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheSpecialSauce
They got a break because they got Stallings for cause . JC is only losing that’s on the people who hired and extended him . If I was JC I’m not reducing my buyout one cent .


Any highly sought person in the job market regardless of profession normally has more than one option for employment, sure someone will take the money , but is he who you want ? Is the Pitt job a a highly desirable job ? Are you furthering your career by going to a school in Pitts situation . The guys you want will have options and Imdoubt Pitt is at the top of anyone’s list other than BK . Pitt taking a chance and throwing millions at an up and comer after the KS and now JC fiascos takes deep pockets and a lot of balls .
It’s attractive because it pays $4M a year in a power conference, has a top-25 budget in college basketball, and has an athletic director and chancellor who are very supportive - financially and otherwise.

It’s not a job without downsides - local recruiting base is a big one, though that’s lessened a bit by its proximity to major markets and places like First Love 30 minutes down the road who bring in quality talent from elsewhere. But coaches aren’t going to look at the talent on any current roster and run away because the portal is going to screw up any new coach’s returning roster. Capel and Lyke have done a good job of fixing the bones, but Capel couldnt turn that skeleton into a functioning body. The next guy won’t have to worry about the bones.
 
How do you know they have nothing for cause here? The buyout will be significantly lower than you think
Would it be common to have a clause dealing with lawbreaking by “your” players?

I realize that such a clause would only be invoked based on dissatisfaction with a coach on a broader basis.

The Hugley situation might be stretched to include players other than Hugley (at least rule breaking) and now you have Horton.

Maybe less public instances also exist?
 
It’s attractive because it pays $4M a year in a power conference, has a top-25 budget in college basketball, and has an athletic director and chancellor who are very supportive - financially and otherwise.

It’s not a job without downsides - local recruiting base is a big one, though that’s lessened a bit by its proximity to major markets and places like First Love 30 minutes down the road who bring in quality talent from elsewhere. But coaches aren’t going to look at the talent on any current roster and run away because the portal is going to screw up any new coach’s returning roster. Capel and Lyke have done a good job of fixing the bones, but Capel couldnt turn that skeleton into a functioning body. The next guy won’t have to worry about the bones.
Can Pitt continue to pay buyouts at whatever the cost is and then pay the next guy 4 mil with an empty Pete ?
 
Do you know something the rest of us don’t know about JC .

Can’t imagine they’re violating recruiting rules !
Would it be common to have a clause dealing with lawbreaking by “your” players?

I realize that such a clause would only be invoked based on dissatisfaction with a coach on a broader basis.

The Hugley situation might be stretched to include players other than Hugley (at least rule breaking) and now you have Horton.

Maybe less public instances also exist?
I know nothing more than you guys do. But the “cause” of what is known to have lowered the stallings buyout wasn’t actually the cause they had. It was leverage. You can’t fire someone for cause for minor violations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary2
Can Pitt continue to pay buyouts at whatever the cost is and then pay the next guy 4 mil with an empty Pete ?
I don’t think the next guy is going to make appreciably less than Capel, no matter what happens. I think it’s going to continue to be a job that pays in the top half/third of the ACC.
 
You guys actually think the buyout got lowered because an extra guy was on the court throwing passes to players? Narduzzi had two of those and got a raise. Some of you will believe anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary2
I know nothing more than you guys do. But the “cause” of what is known to have lowered the stallings buyout wasn’t actually the cause they had. It was leverage. You can’t fire someone for cause for minor violations.
Could player retention rate also be a “break glass in case of emergency clause”?
 
Ok for arguments sake Pitt moves on from JC paying whatever and hires the next great up and comer . Is he taking the job for less than JC ?

So now this unknown coach is a great hire and gets Pitt to .500 ball in the ACC in 3/4 yrs , how many season tickets are sold for a .500 team ?

We were spoiled , Pitt fans want nationally ranked team winning conference championships and aren’t filling the Pete for a middle of the pack ACC program. A lot of money to be mediocre !
 
Why not? It certainly seems reasonable, if you team would be starting a season with no reasonable roster.
Because every team in the portal era is going to be starting with 5-6 new guys on the team every year. You wouldn’t be able to attract a coach if that was your reasoning.
 
Ok for arguments sake Pitt moves on from JC paying whatever and hires the next great up and comer . Is he taking the job for less than JC ?

So now this unknown coach is a great hire and gets Pitt to .500 ball in the ACC in 3/4 yrs , how many season tickets are sold for a .500 team ?

We were spoiled , Pitt fans want nationally ranked team winning conference championships and aren’t filling the Pete for a middle of the pack ACC program. A lot of money to be mediocre !
Depends - how good are the Penguins? And do we have UNC and Duke on the home schedule?
 
Because every team in the portal era is going to be starting with 5-6 new guys on the team every year. You wouldn’t be able to attract a coach if that was your reasoning.
Again, like I indicated, this would not be a clause invoked based on fact, but one based on need to dismiss and mitigate financial loss.

Any coach would understand that.

A hungry new coach would accept school prevention from disaster as a reasonable requirement.
 
Last edited:
I know nothing more than you guys do. But the “cause” of what is known to have lowered the stallings buyout wasn’t actually the cause they had. It was leverage. You can’t fire someone for cause for minor violations.
When you’ve made the amount of money JC has made plus whatever his contractual buyout is what leverage does Pitt have over him ? They’ll keep him from working ? He doesn’t have to work another day the rest of his life , the same as KS .
 
When you’ve made the amount of money JC has made plus whatever his contractual buyout is what leverage does Pitt have over them . They’ll keep him from working ? He doesn’t have to work another day the rest of his life , the same as KS .
Wait time on payment? Drawn out legal wrangling?

A J.T. Wentworth get my money now or a structured settlement.
 
I think the other thing to remember is that he’s signed through 26-27, which is five more seasons after this one. Regardless of the “end year” on the deal, contracts like this are typically written to be renegotiated with ~four years remaining on them. So next year was always going to be the year to renegotiate Capel’s contract, because that’s when he’d have four years left on the deal. So if they make a move this offseason, it’s basically just making a move one year early. Not six years early like it looks like if you just read the contract release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary2
Depends - how good are the Penguins? And do we have UNC and Duke on the home schedule?
No ones buying season tickets plus donation for a Duke or UNC ticket that they can buy on stubhub .

You can’t compare the Penguin or Steeler fans to Pitt fans . The Pirates are a better compare .
 
Wait time on payment? Drawn out legal wrangling?

A J.T. Wentworth get my money now or a structured settlement.
He’s owed a lot of money even if it’s 50% of the full amount , but he’s not a man living paycheck to paycheck. Pitt doesn’t have the upper hand here .

He isn’t a guy making 50k whose being fired for cause that agrees to leave peacefully so that he can retain his pension.
 
Ding ding ding. This buyout will be closer to what we heard Stallings got. And they have the cash lined up

The Stallings buyout was less because we fired him for cause and he had to sue us.

What I would wonder is if Capel only has a roster of 2-3 players in March and 0 recruits, could he be fired for cause for "trying to get fired to collect the buyout." I thought Stallings knew he was going to get fired and quit and was just trying to get the buyout. I cant believe I'm saying this but I think Capel also may be just trying to collect the buyout so he can be richer while coaching NC A&T
 
  • Like
Reactions: cabe23
He’s owed a lot of money even if it’s 50% of the full amount , but he’s not a man living paycheck to paycheck. Pitt doesn’t have the upper hand here .

He isn’t a guy making 50k whose being fired for cause that agrees to leave peacefully so that he can retain his pension.
They have the same leverage they had with Stallings.

Stallings was not exactly reliant on a weekly paycheck.

He was both older and had greater career earning than Capel.
 
Pitt fans love to talk about how Pitt never has any money to do anything even though the football program got a $20M donation before this season even kicked off. Somebody gave Pat Narduzzi $20M dollars when his best season was winning eight games five years ago. It’s turned out to be a good investment, though!

Do people realize how much richer some people got during the pandemic? There are people out there with unexpected amounts of money that’s burning a big hole in their pocket.

$20 million for facilities and coaching salaries is a terrible investment when he could have paid every football $30,000 for 10 years. We are more likely to lure in 4 and 5 stars with a $30K/year salary than with new carpeting.
 
Plus, firing a coach at this time WOULD deter other coaches. I think Lyke has to let the season play out, give him a chance, and assuming it goes the way we expect he will be fired after the season or at least towards the end.

Lets say he goes 4-7 in the non-con and loses his first 10 ACC games. This is possible. I believe that at the moment you're sure you are going to fire him, you should do it then......unless the buyout drops by a few million after like March 15 or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cabe23
The Stallings buyout was less because we fired him for cause and he had to sue us.

What I would wonder is if Capel only has a roster of 2-3 players in March and 0 recruits, could he be fired for cause for "trying to get fired to collect the buyout." I thought Stallings knew he was going to get fired and quit and was just trying to get the buyout. I cant believe I'm saying this but I think Capel also may be just trying to collect the buyout so he can be richer while coaching NC A&T
If your players law and rule breaking is a contract clause and your player retention and the promise to provide a roster is a contract clause, then there is a much stronger cause to fire Capel for cause than ever existed for Stallings.

This is especially so as Capel has been already given a twice as long opportunity.
 
If your players law and rule breaking is a contract clause and your player retention and the promise to provide a roster is a contract clause, then there is a much stronger cause to fire Capel for cause than ever existed for Stallings.

This is especially so as Capel has been already given a twice as long opportunity.
Every player must get accepted by the university and he’s not recruiting out of George Jr . and misleading anyone on these kids characters.

If I remember his players have had excellent academic results .
 
The Stallings buyout was less because we fired him for cause and he had to sue us.

What I would wonder is if Capel only has a roster of 2-3 players in March and 0 recruits, could he be fired for cause for "trying to get fired to collect the buyout." I thought Stallings knew he was going to get fired and quit and was just trying to get the buyout. I cant believe I'm saying this but I think Capel also may be just trying to collect the buyout so he can be richer while coaching NC A&T
That’s not correct
 
Every player must get accepted by the university and he’s not recruiting out of George Jr . and misleading anyone on these kids characters.

If I remember his players have had excellent academic results .
There were red flags with the big guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary2
But his admission was approved by the university .

If your old enough to remember an entire recruiting class was rejected by the university .
I remember the Prop 48 class. The eggheads struck again.

The poor coaching staff hires, lack of team chemistry, no shooters, no offensive or defensive identity, awful recruiting, etc.. This all falls on the head coach. Just an overall abysmal job and he never learned his lesson. The same concept that worked at Duke, isn’t going to work here.
 
Every player must get accepted by the university and he’s not recruiting out of George Jr . and misleading anyone on these kids characters.

If I remember his players have had excellent academic results .
Some broke laws. Some broke rules and Covid protocols. Many just left.

It makes no difference what they were when he recruited them. They are his players and these actions occurred while at Pitt.

IF, big if, clauses exist pertaining to player law breaking and rule breaking and a floor of a roster (all at least possible) then a case could be made (that would delay any financial benefit to Capel until litigated) for dismissal for cause.
 
I remember the Prop 48 class. The eggheads struck again.

The poor coaching staff hires, lack of team chemistry, no shooters, no offensive or defensive identity, awful recruiting, etc.. This all falls on the head coach. Just an overall abysmal job and he never learned his lesson. The same concept that worked at Duke, isn’t going to work here.
There’s no argument here . Terribly disappointing.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT