The final overall tally is currently $5,543,591.56 from 5,577 total gifts (this may continue to go up even though the matching gift challenges are over). This doesn't include the $125K that was anonymously donated as matching funds, and $10K donated by Chancellor Gallagher in matching funds for young alumni, so the actual total could be thought to be $5.679 million. For a comparison, in FY 2016, $78 million total was raised from individual alumni, friends, and groups (excluding corporations and foundation gifts). That means Pitt raised about 7% of last year's total in one day. That's about 25X more than would be expected if gifts were evenly distributed throughout the year. I have to think this campaign was a success.
Here's the results of the Challenges:
Experience Category (by total # of gifts)
1. Athletic Training Panther Pack Project (wins $25K in matching funds)
2. University Center for International Studies (wins $20K in matching funds)
3. Pitt Athletics (wins $12.5K in matching funds)
Student Organizations (by total # of gifts):
1. Pitt Club Tennis (wins $5K in matching funds)
2. Men's Glee Club (wins $2.5K in matching funds)
3. Pitt Rowing Club (wins $1.5K in matching funds)
4. Society of Women Engineers (wins $1K in matching funds)
School Category (by percentage of living alumni)
1. School of Pharmacy (wins $25K in matching funds)
2. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (wins $20K in matching funds)
3. University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (wins $12.5K in matching funds)
Pitt Athletics was at about 175 individual donations at last look before the total gift counts went blank with about 15 minutes to go. That was about 100 short of the athletic trainers pack and 15 short of UCIS. The club tennis team solicited about 3X as many gifts as the athletic department. I think the varsity tennis team needs to bring in the tennis club's fundraiser.
For those discussions that come up about how athletic donations compare to overall donations to the university, at last available look, the # of Athletic Department donations today made up about only 3% of the total number of individual donations. So when you see donation numbers to the university and think the AD is well supported because of that, remember this little experiment today.
The largest and oldest school of the University, the Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences, finished dead last in the % of living alumni that donated at #20. Considering that size of A&S, it isn't unexpected it would be harder to reach that goal, but it is also troubling from not only the aspect of the general support of that school, but also for the university as a whole since it is by far the biggest school and most university graduates come from A&S.
Swanson, the next biggest school, finished only marginally better at 15th. UPJ, the third biggest unit, finished in the money at 3rd. The fourth biggest school, the College of Business, finished 7th. So there is not necessarily a direct correlation between size and % lack of support. Only Pharmacy got to the goal of 2% of living alumni. It doesn't look like any other school got to 1%. Not great.
My guess is that there is likely little connection of alumni to the School of A&S due to its size and broad nature of its offerings. I wish A&S would consider setting up individual departmental funds to drive donations. I've been advocating this for years. Have a Department of Neuroscience scholarship fund, a Philosophy department fund, a Mathematics fund, a Studio Arts fund, etc. I believe they need to set up scholarship and/or research funds (I prefer endowed funds) for every department to encourage (and make it easy) for alumni to donate to something they feel more of a connection with. And I mean easy so that when they give a link, there is a webpage just for that Department and a drop down link at general giving sites. I think Swanson could consider the same with their individual programs.
On the bright side, the Young Alumni Challenge crushed it, more than doubling the goal of 230 young alumni donors (classes 2013 to 2017) and getting the full $10K match form Chancellor Gallagher and his wife.
There is seriously a lot to learn from this. I hope they do it next year, and hope there are even more matching funds.
Here's the results of the Challenges:
Experience Category (by total # of gifts)
1. Athletic Training Panther Pack Project (wins $25K in matching funds)
2. University Center for International Studies (wins $20K in matching funds)
3. Pitt Athletics (wins $12.5K in matching funds)
Student Organizations (by total # of gifts):
1. Pitt Club Tennis (wins $5K in matching funds)
2. Men's Glee Club (wins $2.5K in matching funds)
3. Pitt Rowing Club (wins $1.5K in matching funds)
4. Society of Women Engineers (wins $1K in matching funds)
School Category (by percentage of living alumni)
1. School of Pharmacy (wins $25K in matching funds)
2. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (wins $20K in matching funds)
3. University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (wins $12.5K in matching funds)
Pitt Athletics was at about 175 individual donations at last look before the total gift counts went blank with about 15 minutes to go. That was about 100 short of the athletic trainers pack and 15 short of UCIS. The club tennis team solicited about 3X as many gifts as the athletic department. I think the varsity tennis team needs to bring in the tennis club's fundraiser.
For those discussions that come up about how athletic donations compare to overall donations to the university, at last available look, the # of Athletic Department donations today made up about only 3% of the total number of individual donations. So when you see donation numbers to the university and think the AD is well supported because of that, remember this little experiment today.
The largest and oldest school of the University, the Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences, finished dead last in the % of living alumni that donated at #20. Considering that size of A&S, it isn't unexpected it would be harder to reach that goal, but it is also troubling from not only the aspect of the general support of that school, but also for the university as a whole since it is by far the biggest school and most university graduates come from A&S.
Swanson, the next biggest school, finished only marginally better at 15th. UPJ, the third biggest unit, finished in the money at 3rd. The fourth biggest school, the College of Business, finished 7th. So there is not necessarily a direct correlation between size and % lack of support. Only Pharmacy got to the goal of 2% of living alumni. It doesn't look like any other school got to 1%. Not great.
My guess is that there is likely little connection of alumni to the School of A&S due to its size and broad nature of its offerings. I wish A&S would consider setting up individual departmental funds to drive donations. I've been advocating this for years. Have a Department of Neuroscience scholarship fund, a Philosophy department fund, a Mathematics fund, a Studio Arts fund, etc. I believe they need to set up scholarship and/or research funds (I prefer endowed funds) for every department to encourage (and make it easy) for alumni to donate to something they feel more of a connection with. And I mean easy so that when they give a link, there is a webpage just for that Department and a drop down link at general giving sites. I think Swanson could consider the same with their individual programs.
On the bright side, the Young Alumni Challenge crushed it, more than doubling the goal of 230 young alumni donors (classes 2013 to 2017) and getting the full $10K match form Chancellor Gallagher and his wife.
There is seriously a lot to learn from this. I hope they do it next year, and hope there are even more matching funds.
Last edited: