Yea. Im thinking its going to something like 24-14. New offense is going to struggle early in the season and maybe all season. That's a huge adjustment
Depth Chart for Kent St.
- Thread starter Gunga_Galunga
- Start date
Yea. Im thinking its going to something like 24-14. New offense is going to struggle early in the season and maybe all season. That's a huge adjustment
Gonna go on a limb and suggest Pitt is the only team you follow closely enough to actual know what their depth chart looks like with any regularity.
And the common thread among all of those teams with unsettled depth charts and QBs? They’re all going to suck this year.
Not including Clemson, their chart is plenty settled, they are just withholding it for gamesmanship reasons. They never lack top talent.
Oh so its cool for Clemson cause its gamesmanship? But Pitt is doing it because they have a bad roster. Man some of you act like 12 years old. Its obvious you are just throwing things out there, just to be childish. Grown men need to grow up.
Since you seem to enjoy wearing clown shoes, I spent 2 minutes to google Alabama's depth chart. Here's their defense, which according to you must suck.
DT: Philip Blidi OR Malik Blocton OR Gage Keys OR TJ Lindsey
NT: Isaiah Raikes OR Jayson Jones OR Trill Carter OR Quientrail Jamison-Travis
DE: Keldric Faulk OR Zykeivous Walker OR Amaris Williams
BUCK: Jalen McLeod OR Keyron Crawford OR Jamonta Waller
DIME LB: Eugene Asante OR Robert Woodyard Jr. OR Laquan Robinson
MLB: Dorian Mausi Jr. OR Fa’Najae Gotay OR DJ Barber
SLB: Austin Keys OR Damarcus Riddick
STAR: Champ Anthony OR Jahquez Robinson OR Kensley Louidor-Faustin
SAFETY: Caleb Wooden OR Kaleb Harris OR Griffin Soeaks
SAFETY: Jerrin Thompson OR Sylvester Smith OR Terrance Love
CB: Keionte Scott OR Antonio Kite OR A’Mon Lane-Ganus
CB: Kayin Lee OR JC Hart OR Jay Crawford
You're not very smart.
Clemson is withholding their depth chart for a huge Week 1 game against the best team in college football, because that team won't give Clemson its depth chart.
On the other hand, Pitt and the other teams in that post have released depth charts showing that QB and a number of key positions aren't settled. None of those teams stand to be any good this year, most, including Pitt, stand to be downright bad, and the reality that these teams don't have an obvious starter at QB in Week 1 is the biggest reason for that.
Pretty simple stuff.
That's Auburn's depth chart. Bama hasn't released one yet.
And Auburn's chart is a joke. Yes, they do suck and will suck this year.
What was that you were saying about clown shoes? Aren't you the same poster who was singing The Jurk's praises after the Wofford game, and attacking others who expressed skepticism based on the fact he couldn't even execute a spiral?
Just think of how tough it will be to game plan if you don’t know the identity of the opponents backup defensive end or nickel back.
That's Auburn's depth chart. Bama hasn't released one yet.
And Auburn's chart is a joke. Yes, they do suck and will suck this year.
What was that you were saying about clown shoes? Aren't you the same poster who was singing The Jurk's praises after the Wofford game, and attacking others who expressed skepticism based on the fact he couldn't even execute a spiral?
Well, I googled Alabama's depth chart and got that. I didn't study it. But nice to know they haven't released one either
However, if you'd like you can post Ryan Day's depth chart for Akron.
Fact is many teams do it, but your thing is negativity. Fun way to go through life.
Ryan Day doesn't release depth charts, so that would be difficult to do.
He did, however, name Will Howard as his starting QB for Week 1, and he did that 2 weeks ago.
I'm not criticizing Dooz for putting the ORs on the 2 deep. He's just acknowledging that starters have not emerged at those poositons. I'm saying that a lot of depth chart uncertainty for the teams listed in the tweet above for Week 1, especially at QB, is not something you see from teams that are poised to have good seasons.
Michigan won a natty last year. There's a lot of depth chart uncertainty there this year, including at QB, where it's between two players, each unproven and flawed. Mostly because of that, and the coaching transition, I expect them to struggle significantly this year.
As I noted in an earlier post, I think a lot of it has to do with enabling competition and that a lot of guys are going to play. It's not always a bad thing. I think LB is a young and deep position. I want a lot of those guys to play. Same with safety, we have 3-4 guys that can play.
I'm not going to proclaim they stink until they prove that they do.
Most years, I could have named the Pitt 2 deep for you with at least 80%+ accuracy before camp started, just based on who graduated, who went pro, who was returning, etc. However, in this new era of transfer portal and NIL, I don't even know who a lot of these guys are. And it's tough to care too much who they are because by the time I get used to seeing them in the Blue&Gold, they will be gone next year for various reasons.
Don't get me wrong, I am still rooting for the team as a whole and will be at every home game cheering, but something is lost in terms of connection to players, seeming them grow and develop and whatnot.
Don't get me wrong, I am still rooting for the team as a whole and will be at every home game cheering, but something is lost in terms of connection to players, seeming them grow and develop and whatnot.
No you are not very smart. Its the same reason Pitt is doing it. They have a game next week with the Bearcats. But again, its because Pitt players suck.
Its only simple if you're simplistic enough to think you're God's gift to predicting football records before the season starts.
Pitt will not be "downright bad". Far from it.
Similar threads
