ADVERTISEMENT

Dixon left on his own/Barnes Pushed him out - who cares??

Yes it is a business.

Real life example

JC Penney's was not profitable enough and brought in a new CEO who had a vision to restore profitability and changed the whole dynamics of the organization.

The change resulted in plummeting loses which almost tanked the company.

New CEO was replaced by the Board because of the disastrous results.

Works both ways.

HAIL TO PITT!!!!
Nothing stays the same either you improve or you get worse.
You don't think that Jamies friend the AD at TCU didn't have a conversation with JD prior to their official request to gage his interest. He was gone , people need to get past this unless you want a coach who doesn't want to be here and Jamie didn't want to be here anymore.
 
I'll support the new coach. I want the new coach to take pitt to sweet 16's and beyond. I'll support Barnes in the hire.

However, if the new coach tanks Barnes needs to be gone in 2-3 years. Fair or not. Just like Steve should have been gone after Todd graham bolted.
So you're going to fire the AD if this coach doesn't pan out? Dumb
 
Yes it is a business.

Real life example

JC Penney's was not profitable enough and brought in a new CEO who had a vision to restore profitability and changed the whole dynamics of the organization.

The change resulted in plummeting loses which almost tanked the company.

New CEO was replaced by the Board because of the disastrous results.

Works both ways.

HAIL TO PITT!!!!

Did the previous CEO get fired or forced to resign, or did he decide to leave on his own for another job? It was Dixon's choice.

HAIL TO PITT!!!
 
Did the previous CEO get fired or forced to resign, or did he decide to leave on his own for another job? It was Dixon's choice.

HAIL TO PITT!!!


Ironically, JC Penney asked the old CEO to come back to help right the ship.

I believe he had retired.

He is turning the company around.

HAIL TO PITT!!!!
 
I posted this on another thread to illustrate that what happened with Dixon goes on in the real world all the time....

----------------

Pitt is not only an institution of higher learning, it is a BUSINESS.

Compare it to a restaurant...

Business has not been great the last few years. The patrons were not coming to the establishment as in the past (i.e. attendance has been down) they complained about the menu (weak schedule) the atmosphere had grown apathetic and stale (fans losing interest, didn't care for the style of play).

As the manager (Dixon) it was his responsibility to run the restaurant. He had autonomy over the menu (schedule), style of play (atmosphere) and employees (players). He had been the manager at the restaurant for 13 years and did a great job. However his performance was not on the same level as was in the past.

The owner (Barnes) who purchased the establishment a few months earlier recognized the manager could use some help in getting things back on the right track. He saw the potential in the business and decided to make some suggestions on how to get the patrons interested in coming back.

He suggests getting better assistant managers and would pay more to get better ones. He also wanted to get better help. He wanted the manager to get assistants that would hire more talented waiters and cooks to bring a better taste and atmosphere (better players and style) to the establishment , because that's what his patrons WANTED.

Instead of listening to the new owners suggestions, the manager decided he couldn't function under the new ownership and decided to take a job working for some friends.

The owner decided not to stand in his way even though he had a lucrative contract for the next 7 years. In fact he lowered the buyout of his contract in order for him to go where he wanted to go and be happy.

Now the owner must find a new manager that will work with the owner to capture the vision he wants for the restaurant....

No one was forced out. Barnes is the boss who has a responsibility to the university, the donors and the fans to sell the best product they can for the money they spend. Barnes respected Dixon's coaching ability, but things needed to be tweaked. Dixon balked so he walked.
Business analogies to college sports are very flawed. The University is a business. What happens between the tip-off and the final whistle is a game. Too many personalities and intangibles are involved. And, recruiting and turnover of critical employees is much different and happens on a much different time line. Throw in the random nature or "how the ball bounces" and this line of thought falls competely apart.

Athletic competition is much different than business competition. To use your example, in a restaurant, every meal should always be possible to be made in a tasty or edible manner and if the piece of meat or vegetable is flawed, it can be replaced in minutes. A ruffled customer can be molified with a free meal to replace the flawed dish.. In sports, even the best players miss their crucial shot almost half the time. And nobody is giving do-overs when Scottie Reynolds dashes the length of the court to tear out our hearts. Besides, the manager of a restaurant probably has much less influence on its success than the chefs. If a mnager gives the chef too many orders on how to run his kitchen, the chef is working somewhere else quickly abd taking many of his customers with him. And again, in a restaurant, no defensive player is physically blocking your chef from turning the steak, or stealing the plate from the waiter while he's bringing it to the table.

It's arguable that the changes in the Pitt fanbase when Jeff Long brought in priority seating snd kicked out a significant portion of the city's true basketball fans have helped with the decline of perception of the program locally. Too many people just don't understand the differences and try to make comparisons that don't apply.
 
Last edited:
Business analogies to college sports are very flawed. The University is a business. What happens between the tip-off and the final whistle is a game. Too many personalities and intangibles are involved. And, recruiting and turnover of critical employees is much different and happens on a much different time line. Throw in the random nature or "how the ball bounces" and this line of thought falls competely apart.

Athletic competition is much different than business competition. To use your example, in a restaurant, every meal should always be possible to be made in a tasty or edible manner and if the piece of meat or vegetable is flawed, it can be replaced in minutes. A ruffled customer can be molified with a free meal to replace the flawed dish.. In sports, even the best players miss their crucial shot almost half the time. And nobody is giving do-overs when Scottie Reynolds dashes the length of the court to tear out our hearts. Besides, the manager of a restaurant probably has much less influence on its success than the chefs. If a mnager gives the chef too many orders on how to run his kitchen, the chef is working somewhere else quickly abd taking many of his customers with him. And again, in a restaurant, no defensive player is physically blocking your chef from turning the steak, or stealing the plate from the waiter while he's bringing it to the table.

It's arguable that the changes in the Pitt fanbase when Jeff Long brought in priority seating snd kicked out a significant portion of the city's true basketball fans have helped with the decline of perception of the program locally. Too many people just don't understand the differences and try to make comparisons that don't apply.
0

Dude, get a grip. Of course it's flawed. It's a loosely based analogy, not a scientific case study. The point is that it's always about dollars and cents and when business is not meeting the same standard in the last five years as in the previous eight, changes are made. In some cases bad things happen. It's no ones fault, that's life. You move on....
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT