I watch San Fran as much as possible. They seem to have a nice pro-style scheme.Now try the offense
And pro-style players running it.I watch San Fran as much as possible. They seem to have a nice pro-style scheme.
His scheme has worked here. The biggest problems on D this year IMO were inability to consistently get pressure with their front four, and when they didn’t, poor tackling from the back seven. Losing talent to the NFL and not having replacements ready (can we say that?) ultimately falls on the staff. But it doesn’t mean the scheme is unsound.If Duzz had NFL athletes, his scheme would work here, too.
This x100. Even in a down year, the defense was probably above average. You can only bail a horrendous offense out so long.His scheme has worked here. The biggest problems on D this year IMO were inability to consistently get pressure with their front four, and when they didn’t, poor tackling from the back seven. Losing talent to the NFL and not having replacements ready (can we say that?) ultimately falls on the staff. But it doesn’t mean the scheme is unsound.
And going against pros. Big difference going against the Seahawks then it is the Demon Deacons lol.And pro-style players running it.
The defense was OK this year. Its really hard to look good on D when your offense sputters and your punter gives the other team great field position all game.
Right?I love that this was a really interesting article that also gives a nice shout out to Duzz and most of the replies are pissing and moaning.
What defense works when the front 7 isn't assignment sound and doesn't win their matchups?That works on any level as long as your front seven is assignment sound, and win their matchups.