Refs allowed a lot of thuggy shit all night from FSU.
We didn’t play well but they were straight up thugs with zero whistle
Pitt is definitely soft, but it's pretty clear that FSU has punk players, fans, admins and "cops". If I'm Pitt, I'm not too happy about them putting their hands on our players like that.
I'd argue the opposite is true in the age of NET. You need to do everything possible keep your losses close and do everything possible to boost your margin of victory. If that means last minute dunks, then so be it. If Pitt isn't playing the NET game and not playing to the final whistle, not running back on defense (we could probably use the extra conditioning), then that is Pitt's fault.It wasnt due to that. You dont dunk a ball after the losing team has conceded, especially in this day and age with NET.
I'd argue the opposite is true in the age of NET. You need to do everything possible keep your losses close and do everything possible to boost your margin of victory. If that means last minute dunks, then so be it. If Pitt isn't playing the NET game and not playing to the final whistle, not running back on defense (we could probably use the extra conditioning), then that is Pitt's fault.
No, not in the last one or two seconds of the game. I have never seen a team score on a play like that, up by 10 with 1 second to go. I'm not defending Pitt's play during the game or behavior after the game, but what FSU did at the buzzer is not standard practice, even in the NET age.I'd argue the opposite is true in the age of NET. You need to do everything possible keep your losses close and do everything possible to boost your margin of victory. If that means last minute dunks, then so be it. If Pitt isn't playing the NET game and not playing to the final whistle, not running back on defense (we could probably use the extra conditioning), then that is Pitt's fault.
No, not in the last one or two seconds of the game. I have never seen a team score on a play like that, up by 10 with 1 second to go. I'm not defending Pitt's play during the game or behavior after the game, but what FSU did at the buzzer is not standard practice, even in the NET age.
Now, in the future, you can't let that happen again in you're Pitt.
It's not standard practice, I'd say that's right. But with NET, margin of victory matters. I don't think you can call it meaningless under the NET system, and therefore I don't think you can call it borderline unsportsmanlike. FSU is trying to build its resume, too. The same problem happened in football years ago in the BCS system when it factored in margin of victory and encouraged last minute scores. I remember Herbstreit on Gameday throwing a laptop computer off the stage.I'm not defending Pitt's play during the game or behavior after the game, but what FSU did at the buzzer is not standard practice, even in the NET age.
Watch the full 2 minute replay and watch Hamilton in the handshake line. He turns to see what is going on and sees Ewin dunk the ball and puts his arms up like WTF. Capel saw Ish going to confront and left the handshake line to run over.It's not standard practice, you're right about that. But with NET, margin of victory matters. I don't think you can call it meaningless under the NET system, and therefore I don't think you can call it borderline unsportsmanlike. The same problem happened in football years ago in the BCS system when it factored in margin of victory and encouraged last minute scores. I remember Herbstreit on Gameday throwing a laptop computer off the stage.
I'm only disappointed someone didn't bust Ewin in his mouth after.
Now, in the future, you can't let that happen again in you're Pitt.
I just mean you can't concede defensively with one or two seconds left on the game clock. I didn't mean that you have someone knock a guy's teeth out after the play.Oh, and who exactly is the 'enforcer' on Pitt's roster. Yeah... the ball girl, maybe.
THIS. The FSU dude dunked the ball after everybody stopped playing. Classless punk should leave been punched out.It wasnt due to that. You dont dunk a ball after the losing team has conceded, especially in this day and age with NET.
They actually scored 2 baskets after we conceded.It wasnt due to that. You dont dunk a ball after the losing team has conceded, especially in this day and age with NET.
They actually scored 2 baskets after we conceded.
That chump needed his ass beat. I respect the aggression by Capel to defend his team. Maybe it lights a spark. If you made me chose between this team or the one with Blair throwing Thabeet over his shoulder, it's no contest. We used to have a lot of tough ass players. They need more now.I thought It was an immature thing to do by Ewin at best, classless at worst. That said, that was a complete overreaction by Pitt after the game, and an absolute embarrassment, imo. I'm shocked that so many here think that some clown dunking before the buzzer is a valid reason to get physical & start throwing down. If it's that big a deal, then play to the buzzer.
Sorry, but the dunk didn't warrant any of the BS that occurred afterwards.
I thought Pitt came away looking much worse than FSU in that whole ordeal. A guy simply dunked a ball after Pitt allegedly conceded. It was a jerk move, but it was mostly immaterial. It simply changed the score by 2 points. It's not like he physically harmed or threatened anyone. That's something you let go and then use it for motivation going forward.That chump needed his ass beat. I respect the aggression by Capel to defend his team. Maybe it lights a spark. If you made me chose between this team or the one with Blair throwing Thabeet over his shoulder, it's no contest. We used to have a lot of tough ass players. They need more now.
Edit to add that Pitt played like a team in need of testosterone therapy Wednesday night. Any sign of aggression from them is welcomed and encouraged. But they need to bring it to the next game and every game thereafter. If that punk scoring instead of running the clock out makes the difference, then so be it. But they can't come out soft again and wait to get mad until after the game. We shall see in a short while against Clemson, who has some strong bigs.
Completely agree re: Corhen. This is who he is.I thought Pitt came away looking much worse than FSU in that whole ordeal. A guy simply dunked a ball after Pitt conceded. It was a jerk move, but it was mostly immaterial. It simply changed the score by 2 points. It's not like he physically harmed or threatened anyone. That's something you let go and then use it for motivation going forward.
Also, Capel needs to light that spark long before the outcome of the game is decided. And tbh, in the case of Cam Corhen, if you come out and play soft on your former team's home court, maybe that's just who you are as a player. Not to knock the guy, but he hasn't shown much to make anyone think otherwise.
Can't know what was said that made things escalate there, but Pitt had every right to be pissed off. The game was over. Every team knows the "unwritten rule" that you just let the clock run out there. And what adds fuel to the fire is the whole NET stuff where every point counts. So, it was unfortunate that it became a bit of a melee, but I'm glad we made a point of it. You can bet that Ewin will never do that again.I thought Pitt came away looking much worse than FSU in that whole ordeal. A guy simply dunked a ball after Pitt allegedly conceded. It was a jerk move, but it was mostly immaterial. It simply changed the score by 2 points. It's not like he physically harmed or threatened anyone. That's something you let go and then use it for motivation going forward.
Also, Capel needs to light that spark long before the outcome of the game is decided. And tbh, in the case of Cam Corhen, if you come out and play soft on your former team's home court, maybe that's just who you are as a player. Not to knock the guy, but he hasn't been known the toughest competitor so far.
What the hell even was the last 40+ seconds of that game? Pitt was still trying to score. After an FSU rebound with 34 seconds left in the game, Lowe was still pressuring the ball while the rest of the team gave a half assed effort to get back. Ish & Austin didn't communicate at all and allowed FSU to go over the top and get an easy dunk. That occurred with 25 seconds left. Had Pitt wanted to concede, maybe just hold on to the ball for the last 0:25. Instead, Lowe scores with 17 seconds left. Not sure you get to do that and feel entitled that your opponent run out the clock.
Then why didn't Pitt let the clock run out when they took possession with 25 seconds remaining?Can't know what was said that made things escalate there, but Pitt had every right to be pissed off. The game was over. Every team knows the "unwritten rule" that you just let the clock run out there. And what adds fuel to the fire is the whole NET stuff where every point counts. So, it was unfortunate that it became a bit of a melee, but I'm glad we made a point of it. You can bet that Ewin will never do that again.
It doesn't work that way. The team that's winning lets the clock run out when they have the last possession.Then why didn't Pitt let the clock run out when they took possession with 25 seconds remaining?
Right. But if the concern was the NET and not letting the deficit get over 10, that option was on the table. Isn't there a cap on margin of victory at either 10 or over 10?It doesn't work that way. The team that's winning lets the clock run out when they have the last possession.