ADVERTISEMENT

Further proof-my statements on white liberal women

Over 1000 documented guys now in girls/women’s sports and thousands of medals lost to men.

But don’t worry, bringing that one mistakenly deported gang banger back to the US is a winning issue for ya. Keep it up.

Let's not forget the insider trading and stock manipulation that we MAGA committed because we knew from insider information that the market was going to go up after it went down. Nancy Pelosi knows about that one intimately. And Schumer.

I want the Dems to please keep it up with their "winning" issues. It will guarantee they won't be around come 2028 and will fail miserably in the mid-terms. And their hole keeps getting dug deeper and deeper.
 
They are corrupted by white liberal women. The guys on this board who don’t act like men are likely indoctrinated by their wives. And if grown adult men are that impressionable, then why wouldnt young children (as discussed in other threads) be easily corrupted by certain things?
So are you suggesting that educated women should be barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen and leave this important stuff like running the world to us dumb white guys?
 
Well, you are acting like educated white women are wrong and dragging their husbands down with them. That is pretty weird if you ask me...
I’m not saying that at all. Plenty of conservative educated white women in my life. And they are all smarter than me.

The fact remains that the Dems have become the party of women and if you hone in even deeper, you’ll see it’s even more pronounced when they are urban, unmarried and don’t have children. Frankly I don’t understand how a man can be a Democrat in 2025, unless he’s a billionaire who knows that the Dems will continue to make him richer and richer while selling out the working class.
 
It's pretty clear that SMF has fallen under the democratic spell. Based on those last couple posts, he comes across as really stupid and confused. He is like the rest of the dems, living in an alternate reality. That's OK tho, he is far more educated than the rest of us! Lol
To me, he comes across as somewhat naive and insecure. He obviously appeals to authority as a means to garner validation for his opinion. I guess it's only natural for the young to desire that others recognize their intelligence, but he hasn't realized that first you have to demonstrate intelligence.

Once you can argue your points with facts and logic, you'll no longer care what others think about your opinion. You'll only care that you have evidence that supports your opinion and, when proven wrong, you won't feel like someone beat you but rather be happy that you are now a more knowledgeable person than you were.

His ego is what holds him back. He's more worried about being on the right side than being right.

I blame Jordache jeans. In the 80s I recall kids telling me how they had to only wear certain jeans at school because otherwise they would be teased. If I ever told my parents they had to buy me expensive jeans they would send me to school in pink flood pants. "I don't care what other parents buy their kids. You're MY kid. Being clean and neat is good enough!". "If they jumped off a cliff, would you????"

Getting a masters degree in fashion design or women's studies doesn't make you smart. Opining that not enough people are harmed by your position doesn't mean your position is wrong. It just means you shouldn't care. These are just tactics you use to pretend that you won the debate.
 
To me, he comes across as somewhat naive and insecure. He obviously appeals to authority as a means to garner validation for his opinion. I guess it's only natural for the young to desire that others recognize their intelligence, but he hasn't realized that first you have to demonstrate intelligence.

Once you can argue your points with facts and logic, you'll no longer care what others think about your opinion. You'll only care that you have evidence that supports your opinion and, when proven wrong, you won't feel like someone beat you but rather be happy that you are now a more knowledgeable person than you were.

His ego is what holds him back. He's more worried about being on the right side than being right.

I blame Jordache jeans. In the 80s I recall kids telling me how they had to only wear certain jeans at school because otherwise they would be teased. If I ever told my parents they had to buy me expensive jeans they would send me to school in pink flood pants. "I don't care what other parents buy their kids. You're MY kid. Being clean and neat is good enough!". "If they jumped off a cliff, would you????"

Getting a masters degree in fashion design or women's studies doesn't make you smart. Opining that not enough people are harmed by your position doesn't mean your position is wrong. It just means you shouldn't care. These are just tactics you use to pretend that you won the debate.
Another HOF post. Well done sir
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BPKY
Over 1000 documented guys now in girls/women’s sports and thousands of medals lost to men.

But don’t worry, bringing that one mistakenly deported gang banger back to the US is a winning issue for ya. Keep it up.

Lol. No there isn't. Link please and make sure it's not a right-wing propaganda site.
 
The fact remains that the Dems have become the party of women

This is your coping mechanism because you don't want to be associated with your hillbilly base. The Democratic Party has become the party of the educated, the elites. And this is a problem. Everyone will tell you this. Dems, Republicans, etc. Its a problem.

Trump is only +1 with white college educated men, meaning he's underwater with suburban college educated men. He's +41 with non-college educated white men. This divide is massive.

Men do tend to vote Republican more than women but the education divide is enormous. This is why Republicans want to keep you dumb and keep kids from going to college. They say it's because the professors will indoctrinate you but in reality, leaving your hometown and expanding your horizon makes you see the world differently. Maybe your parents weren't right about everything after all.
 
Last edited:
My lord. They do not. The gender gap is huge. Get a grip man.

Typo. Fixed. I agree men vote Republican more but the huge divide is on education. You glance over that and make it a gender-based difference. Gender matters but education divide cannot be ignored. Republicans are worried about this and it's part of the reason there has been this attack on colleges and this branding of "indoctrination centers." Republicans view colleges as the enemy.
 
Typo. Fixed. I agree men vote Republican more but the huge divide is on education. You glance over that and make it a gender-based difference. Gender matters but education divide cannot be ignored. Republicans are worried about this and it's part of the reason there has been this attack on colleges and this branding of "indoctrination centers." Republicans view colleges as the enemy.
You guys are rewriting history due to TDS. We’ve been well aware of leftist academia for decades before Trump. I mean, this locker room goes back a couple decades and we were talking about it then. The 60’s student radicals are now leading the universities. Terrorists like Bill Aires are writing textbooks and curriculum. We’ve discussed this frontwards and backwards for our entire adult lives.
 
You guys are rewriting history due to TDS. We’ve been well aware of leftist academia for decades before Trump. I mean, this locker room goes back a couple decades and we were talking about it then. The 60’s student radicals are now leading the universities. Terrorists like Bill Aires are writing textbooks and curriculum. We’ve discussed this frontwards and backwards for our entire adult lives.
SMF is the classic soy low T beta male who suffers from white guilt He won’t accept any information that is not sourced from mockingbird media. He’s living proof college educations don’t confer intelligence
 
SMF is the classic soy low T beta male who suffers from white guilt He won’t accept any information that is not sourced from mockingbird media. He’s living proof college educations don’t confer intelligence
Remember Rush Limbaughs tv show in the late 80’s and early 90’s? I was a Clinton voter then. I remember hearing Rush talk about academia back then and how the R’s were going to lose two generations of voters because of what’s going on in the college campuses. I chuckled because I didn’t care. I was a Democrat. Turns out, he was right. The college grads flipped to the Dems in 2000. It’ll flip back again. It’s cyclical. Guys like Charlie Kirk are opening a lot of eyes with college aged kids.
 
You guys are rewriting history due to TDS. We’ve been well aware of leftist academia for decades before Trump. I mean, this locker room goes back a couple decades and we were talking about it then. The 60’s student radicals are now leading the universities. Terrorists like Bill Aires are writing textbooks and curriculum. We’ve discussed this frontwards and backwards for our entire adult lives.

Here's the deal. Yes, most professors are Democrats but in the vast majority of classes you take at a college, the professor isn't indoctrinating you. He/she is teaching. I cannot remember one instance of indoctrination at Pitt and I came out as a Republican. Where "indoctrination" happens is in the general student body's interactions with one another. A diverse student body tends to group-think more left. This is the perceived problem with college AND diversity. The engineering professor isn't teaching critical race theory. Students are being indoctrinatinated by their peers in the dorms, in study groups, etc. When you have intelligent or semi-intelligent people hanging out, living together, they group-think left.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BPKY
Here's the deal. Yes, most professors are Democrats but in the vast majority of classes you take at a college, the professors isn't indoctrinating you. He/she is teaching. I cannot remember one instance of indoctrination at Pitt and I came out as a Republican. Where "indoctrination" happens is in the general student body's interactions with one another. A diverse student body tends to group-think more left. This is the perceived problem with college AND diversity. The engineering professor isn't teaching critical race theory. Students are being indoctrinatinated by their peers in the dorms, in study groups, etc. When you have intelligent or semi-intelligent people hanging out, living together, they group-think left.
You’re half right.
 
You’re half right.

In general, the great fear is that intelligent 18-23 year olds living in close quarters is helping liberalism spread. The professors "indoctrinating" them is really a nothing burger but it creates that boogeyman and it's better to blame it on them than their roommate.

The need is to keep people away from colleges, away from diversity, away from other intelligent people. Its all part of the plan. I've said before, the cold war now is right-wing authoritarianism vs liberal democracy. It's used to be democracy/capitalism vs communism. But this is where we are now. 49.9% of the US has sided with Russia, El Salvador, Hungary, Belarus, and Turkey in this unofficial authoritarian alliance. 48% of the US along with Ukraine, Western Europe, Canada, Australia favor liberal democracy.
 
Here's the deal. Yes, most professors are Democrats but in the vast majority of classes you take at a college, the professor isn't indoctrinating you. He/she is teaching. I cannot remember one instance of indoctrination at Pitt and I came out as a Republican. Where "indoctrination" happens is in the general student body's interactions with one another. A diverse student body tends to group-think more left. This is the perceived problem with college AND diversity. The engineering professor isn't teaching critical race theory. Students are being indoctrinatinated by their peers in the dorms, in study groups, etc. When you have intelligent or semi-intelligent people hanging out, living together, they group-think left.
I don't get that vibe either. A chemistry professor isn't there to propagandize. The only substantial impact from professors would be in the social sciences departments. They all do lean hard left. Which also accounts for the gender gap to some extent.

But your overall point makes sense to me. It's the college culture.

Edit: But your next post is whack. There is no need to avoid colleges. The need is to prepare kids for their first experiences with diverse cultures who lack emotional intelligence and have little to no understanding of American founding principles. They may be book smart (good at memorization), but they may or may not be dumb as a rock in most other areas of life.

You make way too many leaps of logic without justification. And that's your right.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pittisit4me
SMF is the classic soy low T beta male who suffers from white guilt He won’t accept any information that is not sourced from mockingbird media. He’s living proof college educations don’t confer intelligence
imagine being white and hating white people lol. that would suck.
 
I don't get that vibe either. A chemistry professor isn't there to propagandize. The only substantial impact from professors would be in the social sciences departments. They all do lean hard left. Which also accounts for the gender gap to some extent.

But your overall point makes sense to me. It's the college culture.

Yea, I mean if you major in gender studies, then yea, you will get an "indoctrination" but um, there aren't many 18 year old Republicans who choose that major. There just isn't much indoctrinating going on by the professors. Is there some, sure. Will someone post a tweet of some blue-haired hippie professor, sure. They are out there. But most are there just to teach. Some may put a spin on it like in b schools now, maybe they are discussing why tariffs don't work. Is that indoctrination? Does that make someone a Democrat their whole life?

As you called it, the college culture, is what turns these kids left. And what's the cause of that? Intelligent people, diversity, free thought, leaving mom and dad. Republicans want you to vote like your parents did. Stay in your hometown. Become a plumber. Nothing wrong with being a plumber but when you never leave your hometown, you can't expand your mind. You see the world only through a small lens
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard A
imagine being white and hating white people lol. that would suck.

I love white people. Married a white girl, have white kids, and live in a mostly white area. I dislike racists such as yourself. I am anti-racist. The fact that I don't like racists doesn't mean I'm anti white. It means I don't like disgusting, deplorable, hillbilly simpletons.
 
Here's the deal. Yes, most professors are Democrats but in the vast majority of classes you take at a college, the professor isn't indoctrinating you. He/she is teaching. I cannot remember one instance of indoctrination at Pitt and I came out as a Republican. Where "indoctrination" happens is in the general student body's interactions with one another. A diverse student body tends to group-think more left. This is the perceived problem with college AND diversity. The engineering professor isn't teaching critical race theory. Students are being indoctrinatinated by their peers in the dorms, in study groups, etc. When you have intelligent or semi-intelligent people hanging out, living together, they group-think left.
Bullshit i have had graduate business classes where the prof has talked very favorably about the principles of socialism and the decay of society due to capitalism.
Guys like you were part of the indoctrination
You didnt recognize it happening because it was already agreeable to you.
 
I love white people. Married a white girl, have white kids, and live in a mostly white area. I dislike racists such as yourself. I am anti-racist. The fact that I don't like racists doesn't mean I'm anti white. It means I don't like disgusting, deplorable, hillbilly simpletons.
no, you hate yourself. i get it, you've been brainwashed. sucks to be you.
 
Yea, I mean if you major in gender studies, then yea, you will get an "indoctrination" but um, there aren't many 18 year old Republicans who choose that major. There just isn't much indoctrinating going on by the professors. Is there some, sure. Will someone post a tweet of some blue-haired hippie professor, sure. They are out there. But most are there just to teach. Some may put a spin on it like in b schools now, maybe they are discussing why tariffs don't work. Is that indoctrination? Does that make someone a Democrat their whole life?

As you called it, the college culture, is what turns these kids left. And what's the cause of that? Intelligent people, diversity, free thought, leaving mom and dad. Republicans want you to vote like your parents did. Stay in your hometown. Become a plumber. Nothing wrong with being a plumber but when you never leave your hometown, you can't expand your mind. You see the world only through a small lens

Psychology, sociology, poly Sci, history...all the social studies and most non stem fields have moved to the left.

The second paragraph is an example of what I perceived as your whack logic and ridiculous leaps. Nobody wants their kid to be a plumber in stead of an engineer or physicist just to avoid woke professors. That's insane.

Kids do succumb to peer pressure though. They go into school unprepared by their parents, get persuaded, and then have kids and turn back conservative once they experience life and figure out the woke kids in college were not enlightened, but instead were just high 24/7. 🤠
 
no, you hate yourself. i get it, you've been brainwashed. sucks to be you.
Group think is dangerous. I think a sign of the educated is to be able to think for yourself. Many on here have been warped by the thoughts and statements of others. The ability to weed through the bullshit of politics and form your own opinion takes a brain and some backbone to avoid those who may try to influence you.
 
Here's the deal. Yes, most professors are Democrats but in the vast majority of classes you take at a college, the professor isn't indoctrinating you. He/she is teaching. I cannot remember one instance of indoctrination at Pitt and I came out as a Republican. Where "indoctrination" happens is in the general student body's interactions with one another. A diverse student body tends to group-think more left. This is the perceived problem with college AND diversity. The engineering professor isn't teaching critical race theory. Students are being indoctrinatinated by their peers in the dorms, in study groups, etc. When you have intelligent or semi-intelligent people hanging out, living together, they group-think left.
By definition group think is a sign of a lack of intelligence. It’s more akin to sheep
 
The second paragraph is an example of what I perceived as your whack logic and ridiculous leaps. Nobody wants their kid to be a plumber in stead of an engineer or physicist just to avoid woke professors. That's insane.

🤠
I’m not sure if I should give you credit for reading all that drivel (it’s a sign of endurance) or question your sanity I kid

But that statement has to be in the SMF HOF for all time dumb statements. Most stem degrees lead to pretty good jobs with upward mobility to pay back the cost of tuition. More importantly stem majors in general and engineers in particular tend to lean more to the right so woke nonsense isn’t an issue.

It’s the soft non stem degrees that generally are very difficult to provide a return on investment and have the lefty professors So kids who don’t have the inclination or aptitude to get a stem degree are more likely to make the intelligent decision and pursue some other career alternatives
 
I’m not sure if I should give you credit for reading all that drivel (it’s a sign of endurance) or question your sanity I kid

But that statement has to be in the SMF HOF for all time dumb statements. Most stem degrees lead to pretty good jobs with upward mobility to pay back the cost of tuition. More importantly stem majors in general and engineers in particular tend to lean more to the right so woke nonsense isn’t an issue.

It’s the soft non stem degrees that generally are very difficult to provide a return on investment and have the lefty professors So kids who don’t have the inclination or aptitude to get a stem degree are more likely to make the intelligent decision and pursue some other career alternatives
Yep. Any fool can memorize.

Especially with science topics. Hard to believe a journalism major fresh out with his BA has the slightest clue about physics or biochemistry. When someone starts arguing evolution, I first ask them if giraffes grew longer necks in order to reach tree leaves. 90% say yes and I can now turn around and just walk away. I'm not going to educate them for free. Their biology professor already tried and failed. And he at least got paid.

I read all of SMFs posts I can. I think he is salvageable. Not to convert him to being a con, but just to fix his logic. 🤓
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittbb80
By definition group think is a sign of a lack of intelligence. It’s more akin to sheep
The psychology of groupthink is very interesting. It is pretty clear from research that even a lone dissenting voice improves the quality of decision making. This is an interesting read:
https://atlantic-books.co.uk/book/n...ve decisions and the production of good ideas.

The book looks at some research done into juries and how they arrive at decisions. It also looks at situations where group think can convince people to do something entirely wrong. One example was when working in a group to answer quiz questions as a team, when several team members "planted" as part of the research insisted a green item was actually yellow, they were able to get their group to agree it was yellow. When individuals alone or in a group without a majority of "plants" in them saw the same item, they correctly identified the colour. The book uses the movie "Twelve Angry Men" as an illustration of how dissent can challenge and overcome group think.

It's a fascinating book, and one that I learned some ideas I could use to improve my own decision making. I read it when I was Department Head for a university. I wanted to make better decisions. I used these principles to allow and encourage dissenting views on decisions, and to dissent myself to get people thinking of alternative solutions. None of us are always right. I just thought it would be best to figure out when I was wrong before doing something costly or harmful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fk_Pitt
There's the Locker Room! Some of you guys don't even try to hide your racism.

I dont know why FK is so infatuated by women with a college degree. They vote Dem. Trump only won white men with a college degree by 1 point. White men benefit the most from anti-DEI. Is this rocket science?

Education, education, education. The more of it you have, the more likely you are to vote Dem. To make you guys feel better, they make college professors the boogeyman, when in reality it's the leaving of your hometown, meeting new people who don't look like everyone else in your hometown, and expanding your mind. Republicans want to keep you dumb. That's the plan.
99% of Harvard administration, provost, professors, president contribute to dem party. How do u think the students will vote. Its not rocket science
 
The psychology of groupthink is very interesting. It is pretty clear from research that even a lone dissenting voice improves the quality of decision making. This is an interesting read:
https://atlantic-books.co.uk/book/n...ve decisions and the production of good ideas.

The book looks at some research done into juries and how they arrive at decisions. It also looks at situations where group think can convince people to do something entirely wrong. One example was when working in a group to answer quiz questions as a team, when several team members "planted" as part of the research insisted a green item was actually yellow, they were able to get their group to agree it was yellow. When individuals alone or in a group without a majority of "plants" in them saw the same item, they correctly identified the colour. The book uses the movie "Twelve Angry Men" as an illustration of how dissent can challenge and overcome group think.

It's a fascinating book, and one that I learned some ideas I could use to improve my own decision making. I read it when I was Department Head for a university. I wanted to make better decisions. I used these principles to allow and encourage dissenting views on decisions, and to dissent myself to get people thinking of alternative solutions. None of us are always right. I just thought it would be best to figure out when I was wrong before doing something costly or harmful.
The all sounds eerily familiar....

 
  • Like
Reactions: USN_Panther
The all sounds eerily familiar....

That clip summed it up perfectly. Why didn't you show that to me earlier? I wouldn't have needed to read the book.

I had this conversation once with an ice hockey referee. I told him about the book and that the refs should listen to dissent and not give us unsportsmanlike penalties for trying to improve their decision making. The guy was a true academic. He was studying for a PhD in Peace and Conflict studies at the time. His response was brilliant: "I haven't read that book yet, so right now you need to trust me and just go sit down in the penalty box".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BPKY
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT