agree. The ref who called that was almost at half court and had no angle to make that call. He should be reprimanded for even blowing his whistle on a play that can't be reviewed.If Syracuse had lost that game after the refs totally blew that out of bounds call it would have been a shame.
Who decided to play ANO all those mins? That was no jinx.So one of the weakest Syracuse teams in many years has advanced as far as the best Pitt team ever. Some programs are just jinxed. There's no explanation.
You did have to put it like that huh?So one of the weakest Syracuse teams in many years has advanced as far as the best Pitt team ever. Some programs are just jinxed. There's no explanation.
So one of the weakest Syracuse teams in many years has advanced as far as the best Pitt team ever. Some programs are just jinxed. There's no explanation.
Dixon has to be punching a wall somewhere thinking why can't his team's do that.
And if wisky had advanced....it would be worse.So one of the weakest Syracuse teams in many years has advanced as far as the best Pitt team ever. Some programs are just jinxed. There's no explanation.
On the flip side of 'Cuse, think of Gonzaga, They're way past the point of being a "Cinderella." They get as good of talent as anywhere, yet they never seem to get past the Sweet 16. (No I didn't look up stats; maybe they have, just can't remember it.) Does Few get a free pass for life or does their fanbase start to grumble?
Yep. I've always found it to be a fascinating phenomenon that the programs with the better coaches usually seem to be luckier than the others.Some programs are just jinxed....There's no explanation.
Well, if you're giving us a half a win, don't you have to give us a half loss too?
3 1/2 - 1/2
After the Wisconsin loss, Dixon said he was "devastated" by it. Maybe that is part of the problem - no one should be devastated by losing a basketball game. It is only a game. I get that he is very competitive and wants to win - all coaches at his level do. But it is not life and death.POST OF THE YEAR! It also does support what Harve and others have said about the tourney. That being said, the best coaches, the "legends" find ways to get it done. This was one of the worst Syracuse team and Duke team that I have seen, they go to the Sweet 16 and Elite 8 respectively. Same with Wisconsin.
While you can't solely measure a program and coach's total success by how they do in the NCAA tourney, it is how the sport determines its championship. So it does matter. A lot. For all of the success Jamie had (and Ben) we never had that "one shining moment", that unexpected run. The Elite 8 run was nice, but we were a 1 seed. And we could have lost any of our first 3 games, we didn't exactly play well in any of those games.
One reason I am not crying over Dixon's departure is that maniacal, every possession is the end of the world even against St. Francis in December angst that grows even more painful, leading to the absolute tightest wound up human being to roam any sidelines that invariably always transfers to the players who then tense up accordingly. Bye Jamie. Thanks for memories. Good.....and bad.
The formula in March is to have very good offense and adequate D.
Certainly, at least since Kent state.So one of the weakest Syracuse teams in many years has advanced as far as the best Pitt team ever. Some programs are just jinxed. There's no explanation.
Keep in mind that Syracuse beat a 7-seed, a 15-seed, and a 11-seed to get to the Elite 8.
That's not quite the murderer's row. They got very fortunate in who they were matched up against.
UUUH no. Won the first half. Didn't play the second half so how do you give us half a loss for a half that wasn't played?Well, if you're giving us a half a win, don't you have to give us a half loss too?
3 1/2 - 1/2
No, they didn't play the other half, Pitt won the first halfWell, if you're giving us a half a win, don't you have to give us a half loss too?
3 1/2 - 1/2