ADVERTISEMENT

Good thing Pitt didn't hire Tom Bradley

Well then why don't you explain how the State Police, CYS, and the DA never did anything? I'll be waiting...
Go wait on the biggest sex scandal university board in existence, trying to defend the actions of offenders that destroyed 30 or more victims. Go to the Tenn. Vol board , I am certain they are also waiting.
 
Not to hijack this thread but do you think maybe Bradley being a candidate for the Pitt/Temple job is one of the reasons why this got exposed to begin with?

What are the possibility that when Pitt or Temple did it's due diligence on him that they uncovered that cess pool and they pointed it out? Damn that would be glorious if it happened that way.
 
Its time for you to step away from your nitter crack pipe. JS and the horrible things he did under jopa's watchful eye wasn't much of a secret even outside of crappy valley. Did you notice that NOBODY ever tried to hire Jerry?????? It is beyond the level of credible deniability for anyone on that coaching staff to claim ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saboteur
Not to hijack this thread but do you think maybe Bradley being a candidate for the Pitt/Temple job is one of the reasons why this got exposed to begin with?

What are the possibility that when Pitt or Temple did it's due diligence on him that they uncovered that cess pool and they pointed it out? Damn that would be glorious if it happened that way.
It certainly stirred the pot.
 
We had Bradley down here at Wvu before he went to Ucla.He did a really good job helping Gibby with the defense but wanted to get back on the field as a DC.Im ready for the usual Pitt comments like he fit right in with your drunken football and basketball coaches.Come on I have broad shoulders hit me with them and no my wife's not my cousin.

I'd like to have a drink or ten with either of your coaches..
 
Unbelievable how people don’t even understand the basic facts. Sandusky was Not convicted on any charges related to McQuerry and his testimony.

Uh you may want to go back and check "your facts"........

Victim 2 is the kid MM saw in the shower.....

JS was convicted of 4 of the 5 total counts

You saps have been drinking the Koolaide and spewing this garbage for so long you actually believe it

You are dumb and disgusting

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/06/jerry_sandusky_verdict_complet.html
 
No you haven't. The only one's banned are those that are way over the top. Banned? For what? Please tell me? Because I question bs that isn't true? I'm a premium member as well.
You are automatically banned if anything in your screen name has Pitt or Panther. That's a fact
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4Mark_Marty
Unbelievable how people don’t even understand the basic facts. Sandusky was Not convicted on any charges related to McQuerry and his testimony.

What does being convicted have to do with facts? You can be guilty as hell and have done something is reality, but not be convicted.

You cultish nitters are all the same. If Bradley, Schiano and all of the coaches who coached with Paterno and Sandusky didn't know that Sandusky was raping little boys in PSU facilities, they're all dumb as morons and aren't worth discussing as coaches. So they were either guilty for the coverup for decades or they're all a bunch of morons. Take your pick. It's one or the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiehardPanther
What does being convicted have to do with facts? You can be guilty as hell and have done something is reality, but not be convicted.

You cultish nitters are all the same. If Bradley, Schiano and all of the coaches who coached with Paterno and Sandusky didn't know that Sandusky was raping little boys in PSU facilities, they're all dumb as morons and aren't worth discussing as coaches. So they were either guilty for the coverup for decades or they're all a bunch of morons. Take your pick. It's one or the other.

As I said the facts are he was convicted of 4 if the 5 counts related to MMS testimony. So this bozo is flat out lying
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saboteur
No you haven't. The only one's banned are those that are way over the top. Banned? For what? Please tell me? Because I question bs that isn't true? I'm a premium member as well.

You are totally wrong sir.

You do not have to be over the top to be banned on the BWI.

Also you are not going to convince anyone on the Pitt Board of your Penn State nonsense when it comes to child molestation and the how Penn State people were involved and convicted.

BYE!!!!

HAIL TO PITT!!!!
 
Honestly, how you Nits can sit back and defend any of this with "the law" or you weak BOT is laughable. Sandusky was a walking, talking time bomb and it wasn't even a secret but, you know, football. You couldn't live and breathe in that State College without knowing that. You guys that show up on Saturday, dump trash all over the place, and blow a big black cloud of exhaust on your way up over Seven Mountains don't have the first clue. If you did, you'd have known your BOT was a financially and morally corrupt joke long before any of this went down and that there were a lot of things that looked and smelled wrong about the situation.

The truth is money. Between what the football program meant and all of the Second Mile nonsense, there was a ton of money being made and guys like Gricar don't get to be re-elected if they don't play ball. Charges get dropped and investigations go away. Took a rogue investigator with a backbone, following a steroid ring, to accidentally happen upon a noisy mother with a credible story that couldn't be ignored to break it open. Simple as that.

You guys make this worse and worse all the time. Just shut up and go back to being sheep with loose checkbooks and you'll be so much happier.
 
badger988 said:
Unbelievable how people don’t even understand the basic facts. Sandusky was Not convicted on any charges related to McQuerry and his testimony.


LOL Crickets when the Koolaide drinking Nit is confronted with actual facts.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT