I don't have any issue with a glorified fullback like Tebow winning the Heisman as an anomaly. I will always think he was GROSSLY overrated and a definite product of his system but he isn't the first player for that to be the case an he won't be the last either.
I just think that should be the exception, not the norm. Shouldn't a reasonable percentage of these guys have some success as pros? I mean they are playing the same sport, right?
And for the most part we are not talking about guys who went on to be good but not great pros. We are talking about tons and tons of guys who either never made the NFL or were career back ups. I'm sorry but to me that is a deal breaker. I don't care how many phony passing records your program's system allows you to break or in Tebow's case, I don't care how many Christian zealots rush to fellate you every time you genuflect in the end zone, I have to actually see the talent and in FAR too many instances there isn't any talent there to see.
There are some exceptions there. Cam Newton is a great player and Carson Palmer has enjoyed a solid career. It is just that for those two, I have just seen a sea of guys like Troy Smith, Danny Weurffel, Tim Tebow, Erich Crouch, Matt Leinart, Gino Toretta, etc. and it makes the whole award kind of, eh, for me.
Again, I don't begrudge anyone who gets pumped over it. I just don't put a whole lot of stock into it because it is largely like Homecoming King, a popularity contest, Being the first overall pick in the NFL draft is a much bigger deal to me and many of those guys bust too. It's just that when those guys bust, they typically become back ups and journeymen, not preachers and analysts.