Chris made reference in an earlier post today to the projected very positive "hit rate" (i.e.the percentage of recruits who turn out to be program contributors ) for the class of 2019 and it caused me to just quickly review our past 3 yrs of recruiting and it seems in general that Narduzzi's "hit rate " is higher than we had experienced in the past several years . In other words , it appears that in recent years he has fewer "misses" on guys who end up not seeing productive time on the field. Again , this was based on a quick look at the names in those years.
If my instinct is true it serves as an endorsement for the staff's ability to judge/project talent and that is an important attribute . It's common sense that if two teams each have comparable classes rated in the 30's but one has far more "misses' than the other , in retrospect one staff did much better than the other.
If my observation is accurate, let's hope it continues
If my instinct is true it serves as an endorsement for the staff's ability to judge/project talent and that is an important attribute . It's common sense that if two teams each have comparable classes rated in the 30's but one has far more "misses' than the other , in retrospect one staff did much better than the other.
If my observation is accurate, let's hope it continues
