ADVERTISEMENT

Hugley

Federico is a better strong inside presence on the end it matters
On the defensive end
I mean you have to be delusional if you don’t think a taller , more athletic , and better shot blocking and rebounder in Federico isn’t a stronger inside presence


Remember, you are talking to a guy who a few years ago when the discussion was on who should be starting and playing time distribution said that if he were making the starting lineup he wouldn't even consider defense.

Of course he's going to pretend that he never said that, because eventually even he realized how absurd it was. But that doesn't change the fact that he did say it.
 
I have no idea about his
current attitude, and his
wilingness to come back,
put the past behind him,
and start over. IMO threre
is nothing to suggest that
he will or can do this.

But seriously, what do any
of us really know about
what he can or can't do
relative to his current and
future situation. This is part
of Capel's job description.
These are his players, and
he has a responsibility to
his players. BTW, Big John
also has a responsibility.
A responsibility to his team,
the program, and his coach.
Let's see how this plays out.
Great post!
 
I guess if you ignore 2.5 years of evidence with him and .5 years without him of evidence you are correct.
Big John wasn’t the reason they were losing the last two yrs . If you think that you’re not anywhere near the bb expert you think you are .

They’re not winning this yr because he’s not playing . They’re winning because they added Hinson , Cummings , Elliot , Fede and Nike plus the excellent play of Burton .
 
Big John wasn’t the reason they were losing the last two yrs . If you think that you’re not anywhere near the bb expert you think you are .

They’re not winning this yr because he’s not playing . They’re winning because they added Hinson , Cummings , Elliot , Fede and Nike plus the excellent play of Burton .
Wow you really are clueless.
 
Wow you really are clueless.
You’re right I’m clueless in that believing that losing a strong post player who was far and away their best player on teams that were grossly undermanned wouldn’t help this team . You wait Pitt will play someone where Fede will commit 3 quick fouls and the twins won’t physically match up against them . You’re right having Big John would be useless . Talk about being clueless !
 
You’re right I’m clueless in that believing that losing a strong post player who was far and away their best player on teams that were grossly undermanned wouldn’t help this team . You wait Pitt will play someone where Fede will commit 3 quick fouls and the twins won’t physically match up against them . You’re right having Big John would be useless . Talk about being clueless !
Your first 4 words were the first correct words you’ve ever posted on this website.
 
Having both Femi and Hugley would only make this team better .
FEMI! Hahahahahahaha

I remember when I told this website Femi sucked when they all marveled at his potential. Look at his stats at Seton Hall. He still sucks. Funny thing about perceived potential… most don’t know have much more room for growth when they’re 20 year old freshmen…
 
FEMI! Hahahahahahaha

I remember when I told this website Femi sucked when they all marveled at his potential. Look at his stats at Seton Hall. He still sucks. Funny thing about perceived potential… most don’t know have much more room for growth when they’re 20 year old freshmen…
Opps that’s my error , I meant Fede , but thinking having both Fede and Hugley weakens the Panthers is being clueless on your part .

Nowhere am I suggesting that Fede is riding the pine most of the game and seeing minimal PT .

You’re also selling the coaching staff short in that thinking they couldn’t figure out how best to use Hugley and Fede .

Your great call that JC is fired in a few seasons must be do Hugley coming back and JC playing him . Let’s not forget your great call earlier this season that this team is similar to the talent level of KS 2 !

I never present myself as someone who knows it all like you , and if you knew 10% of what you think you know why aren’t coaching at the college level ? No answer needed I already know the answer .
 
Last edited:
Opps that’s my error , I meant Fede , but thinking having both Fede and Hugley weakens the Panthers is being clueless on your part .

Nowhere am I suggesting that Fede is riding the pine most of the game and seeing minimal PT .

You’re also selling the coaching staff short in that thinking they couldn’t figure out how best to use Hugley and Fede .

Your great call that JC is fired in a few seasons must be do Hugley coming back and JC playing him .

I never present myself as someone who knows it all like you , and if you knew 10% of what you think you know why aren’t coaching at the college level ? No answer needed I already know the answer .
i mean… I have… and most likely will again next season if I choose to… lol…

So you want them to produce completely different offenses for when Fede and Hugley are in the game? They have completely different games. Fede and whichever twin is a 5, do not. Continuity would be ruined and so would the flow of the game. They’re much better with twin5 and Fede. It’s not close.
 
i mean… I have… and most likely will again next season if I choose to… lol…

So you want them to produce completely different offenses for when Fede and Hugley are in the game? They have completely different games. Fede and whichever twin is a 5, do not. Continuity would be ruined and so would the flow of the game. They’re much better with twin5 and Fede. It’s not close.
I know how confusing for them , who would ever expect ACC level players and coaches to be able to adapt to having different players on the court .
 
I know how confusing for them , who would ever expect ACC level players and coaches to be able to adapt to having different players on the court .
I just don’t understand why you’d go from a free flowing wide open pick and roll offense to a slow down post entry offense. It makes no sense to anyone here except you
 
I just don’t understand why you’d go from a free flowing wide open pick and roll offense to a slow down post entry offense. It makes no sense to anyone here except you
Who says that Pitt would totally change their offense that’s working to accommodate Big John . Having a guy that the defense needs to account for down low would only give the shooters more space .

Even the best of shooters have off nights or you run into a team that plays tough perimeter D , it’s never a bad thing to have a plan B .
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobfree
Who says that Pitt would totally change their offense that’s working to accommodate Big John . Having a guy that the defense needs to account for down low would only give the shooters more space .

Even the best of shooters have off nights or you run into a team that plays tough perimeter D , it’s never a bad thing to have a plan B .
I was a Hugley guy. But he doesn’t fit with the what this team’s doing. The Hugley that we know wouldn’t work with what they’re doing. And in addition to his defense lacking (to be quite generous) he wasn’t even rebounding. Unless his game undergoes a big transformation he’s a net negative. And again - that’s coming from someone who thought he had some upside.

Does that mean he couldn’t contribute at some point? Not at all. Maybe he gets himself right (only priority) and gets to work. But the same Hugley bogs things down. But who knows what this team even looks like next year.
 
Who says that Pitt would totally change their offense that’s working to accommodate Big John . Having a guy that the defense needs to account for down low would only give the shooters more space .

Even the best of shooters have off nights or you run into a team that plays tough perimeter D , it’s never a bad thing to have a plan B .
We had trouble for a lot of the game with Hugley against Alabama State for heaven's sake!! Are you for real? The Pitt team started thriving when Hugley stopped playing, why can't you see that? Look at Northwestern, we won by 29 because Capel pretty much benched him after the first few minutes. He scored 0 points.
 
The main reason I wouldn't want him back.... isn't about his body or anything about his play.
It's his on court attitude
It's loser crybaby shit

His on court disposition was clearly different in the few games this year verses what we saw last season. I thought it was obvious he was going through some stuff before anything was made public.

The other item which seems to be forgotten is Hugley was big in attracting this year's team to Pitt. A selfish person doesn't help attract more talent which will obviously take touches from them.
 
His on court disposition was clearly different in the few games this year verses what we saw last season. I thought it was obvious he was going through some stuff before anything was made public.

The other item which seems to be forgotten is Hugley was big in attracting this year's team to Pitt. A selfish person doesn't help attract more talent which will obviously take touches from them.
Yeah he actually does deserve some credit for this year‘s team success. But ironically it’s not been about his play but more about what he did in the off-season to help with the recruiting effort.
 
Who says that Pitt would totally change their offense that’s working to accommodate Big John .


People who understand basketball. Because Hugley isn't suited to play the way we are playing now, and this team is not ideally suited to play the way that would bring out anything close to the best in Hugley.

So if they didn't change anything Hugley would hurt the team trying to play the way we are playing. And if they did change things to accommodate Hugley it would take away some of the effectiveness of the other players on the team.

Sometimes a player's game doesn't fit in with the best way for the rest of the team to play. This is one of those instances.
 
First off, I like John and hope he gets it together. Having said that, John is a 4, he is not a 5. Even in prime condition, John cannot play the 5. He hasn't got the hops or the mobility to defend the 5. He just can't move and jump like Fede. Offensively, he is a low post player and could be effective in certain matchups. However, clogging up the lane could be a detriment to our better players who excel on the dribble drive. I just don't see how he would make this team better right now.
Next year, without Jamarius, Nike, and Nelly there could be a place for him as we will clearly be a different team. We may may need a low post player to run the offense through, but he is a 4, and would have to be able to defend a almost certainly more mobile player than himself. I don't think his offensive output would ever surpass his defensive liabilities. We have seen Pitt's best defense in a long time this year, and it is not a coincidence that big John has not been a part of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FireballZ
Having both Femi and Hugley would only make this team better .
Incorrect
Because the evidence disproves it
Hugley is a poor defender and poor rebounder
How is playing him instead of Guillermo a better option ?
Listen Hugley demands the ball on offense - makes the offense worse
Hence we lost a lot of games with him as the focus
 
Incorrect
Because the evidence disproves it
Hugley is a poor defender and poor rebounder
How is playing him instead of Guillermo a better option ?
Listen Hugley demands the ball on offense - makes the offense worse
Hence we lost a lot of games with him as the focus
What evidence would you be talking about ? Thirty minutes or whatever amount of time he played this year while having knee and mental health issues which you failed to recognize.

How could anyone whose watched Pitt bb compare this roster to any of the other rosters Pitt has had under JC . You have team oriented guys who defend and can shoot the three . This team is better because of the players they added not solely because John isn’t playing .

Players roles are always being redefined depending on circumstances ,

Pitt ( not we unless you were suiting it up ) lost because their roster sucked . They couldn’t shoot or defend and of course that’s all on Hugley .

So Big John is going to beat up his teammates unless he’s the focus of the offense .

I wished someone in the media would ask JC if he wants Hugley back next season , but I already know what his answer would be despite what you and Bb insider think .
 
What evidence would you be talking about ? Thirty minutes or whatever amount of time he played this year while having knee and mental health issues which you failed to recognize.

How could anyone whose watched Pitt bb compare this roster to any of the other rosters Pitt has had under JC . You have team oriented guys who defend and can shoot the three . This team is better because of the players they added not solely because John isn’t playing .

Players roles are always being redefined depending on circumstances ,

Pitt ( not we unless you were suiting it up ) lost because their roster sucked . They couldn’t shoot or defend and of course that’s all on Hugley .

So Big John is going to beat up his teammates unless he’s the focus of the offense .

I wished someone in the media would ask JC if he wants Hugley back next season , but I already know what his answer would be despite what you and Bb insider think .
I appreciate your positivity, yet still think you were kicked in the head by a goat while not wearing a helmet…
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
i mean… I have… and most likely will again next season if I choose to… lol…

So you want them to produce completely different offenses for when Fede and Hugley are in the game? They have completely different games. Fede and whichever twin is a 5, do not. Continuity would be ruined and so would the flow of the game. They’re much better with twin5 and Fede. It’s not close.
Listen, man. I’ve come around on your viewpoint on most things, but let’s not pretend that you’ve not been a huge XJ fan.

You can claim the high ground on Pitt being better without Hugley, but in the same vein, you can’t deny that IU hasn’t been been better without XJ….
 
Listen, man. I’ve come around on your viewpoint on most things, but let’s not pretend that you’ve not been a huge XJ fan.

You can claim the high ground on Pitt being better without Hugley, but in the same vein, you can’t deny that IU hasn’t been been better without XJ….
They replaced him with more Hood Schifino who is much better than him.

XJ was infinitely better than Femi. Always was
 
  • Like
Reactions: FireballZ
First off, I like John and hope he gets it together. Having said that, John is a 4, he is not a 5. Even in prime condition, John cannot play the 5. He hasn't got the hops or the mobility to defend the 5. He just can't move and jump like Fede. Offensively, he is a low post player and could be effective in certain matchups. However, clogging up the lane could be a detriment to our better players who excel on the dribble drive. I just don't see how he would make this team better right now.
Next year, without Jamarius, Nike, and Nelly there could be a place for him as we will clearly be a different team. We may may need a low post player to run the offense through, but he is a 4, and would have to be able to defend a almost certainly more mobile player than himself. I don't think his offensive output would ever surpass his defensive liabilities. We have seen Pitt's best defense in a long time this year, and it is not a coincidence that big John has not been a part of it.
John did not move great when he was in shape, he is not a 4. He could not even guard the 5 last year well. If you cannot guard it, you cannot play it.
What evidence would you be talking about ? Thirty minutes or whatever amount of time he played this year while having knee and mental health issues which you failed to recognize.

How could anyone whose watched Pitt bb compare this roster to any of the other rosters Pitt has had under JC . You have team oriented guys who defend and can shoot the three . This team is better because of the players they added not solely because John isn’t playing .

Players roles are always being redefined depending on circumstances ,

Pitt ( not we unless you were suiting it up ) lost because their roster sucked . They couldn’t shoot or defend and of course that’s all on Hugley .

So Big John is going to beat up his teammates unless he’s the focus of the offense .

I wished someone in the media would ask JC if he wants Hugley back next season , but I already know what his answer would be despite what you and Bb insider think .
To the point of Hugley and this team, I side with the folks that say that this particular unit is better without him.

You noted that they could not defend last year. That was 100% on Hugley being very weak on D, not giving effort at times and often being out of position.

Fede has turned their backline into a positive and he fixes mistakes at the hoop and within the team defensive concept. He mentally plays D like a guard on the backline and it has made Pitt so much better.

John was important for them last year because they lacked scoring and he does score well near the hoop. As a result, he was their most valuable player last year. But, he also ate way too many possessions with bad plays and his defense was very bad (though not nearly as bad as this year).

I like John a lot and I think he still has a lot of potential. He is very big, has very soft hands, really good coordination and he does some things well naturally that are very hard to teach. He has tools that are hard to find and because he actually can shoot, he can play in the modern game well if he gets it together. By the same token, he is a very incomplete basketball player that does not play defense much of time and offensively has been known to kill possessions.

He tried to impose on the game this year like last year and it largely hurt the team when he played because he did not have the conditioning that he had last year. He also did show some bad body language though I think he always has had a little of it. He really only helped the team on one end last year because they did not have much else offensively with Burton playing injured, Horton out and then coming back out of rhythm and Femi going through the motions.

I have always viewed him as a project in a way. It was always going to take time because they needed to get him flexible with core stability, in-shape and he needed to firm his skills/understanding of the game. Before the injury, he did steadily improve through years of time. And, getting hurt is not his fault (though the weight gain does fall on him, but it is really hard).

This all said, I think Panther fans tend to really overrate him. He scored a lot on a bad team. He contributed heavily to the bad by not playing any defense for the most part.

I am sure that they want him back; they have invested a lot into him, they know him and he has things that other guys just do not have. But, with Fede and the twins and how you would expect them to improve in the next year, they clearly do not need him anymore. And, because it is a two way game and ostensibly Hinson should return, I do not think he fits as well as Fede does into how they are likely to play next year (which is still a matter of debate but it is clear that if he is here, Hinson will shoot a lot of shots).

I really hope that he hits his potential as a Panther. He could be a guy that impacts play at this level like Armando Bacot for example. Big guys still mean something if you have a good one. But, he has an awfully long way to get there both with getting back in shape and having consistent play on both ends.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ronnyp91
A

Agreed, but not a good look for XJ as a 5th year starter being outplayed by a true frosh.
Hood Schifino has developed into a likely first round guy. There is no shame in being outplayed by a first round guy and Indiana played just fine when both were healthy. I think looking to bash X a touch is not really needed. He is a really good basketball player and Indiana is better with him healthy. He is not at all comparable with negative effect as to a guy like Hugley.
 
Hood Schifino has developed into a likely first round guy. There is no shame in being outplayed by a first round guy and Indiana played just fine when both were healthy. I think looking to bash X a touch is not really needed. He is a really good basketball player and Indiana is better with him healthy. He is not at all comparable with negative effect as to a guy like Hugley.
Yep. Not comparing situations. Just giving Insider a hard time about asserting a win about Pitt being better without Hugley while touting XJs greatness.

No doubt that IU is a better team with XJ, healthy, coming off the bench as a backup guard. But is he willing?
 
Yep. Not comparing situations. Just giving Insider a hard time about asserting a win about Pitt being better without Hugley while touting XJs greatness.

No doubt that IU is a better team with XJ, healthy, coming off the bench as a backup guard. But is he willing?
I am a little lost as to where you get this idea that they are better without him. Since he has been injured, they are 9-4 with losses to Iowa, NW, PSU and Maryland. Largely not bad losses, but they have not been world beaters without him.

He clearly is a starter there; it is not even a question. They have been hot recently and that is great for them. But, he is one of their best 3 players, he will be on the floor a lot once he returns and is in condition.
 
I am a little lost as to where you get this idea that they are better without him. Since he has been injured, they are 9-4 with losses to Iowa, NW, PSU and Maryland. Largely not bad losses, but they have not been world beaters without him.

He clearly is a starter there; it is not even a question. They have been hot recently and that is great for them. But, he is one of their best 3 players, he will be on the floor a lot once he returns and is in condition.
We’re all good. I’m sure Insider understands my sentiment, which is largely in jest.

I think IU has found their niche of late without XJ. You can state overall record since injury, but not really an apt comparison since Pitt benched Hugley since we did so with so scrub games to work out the kinks while IU was in the middle of conference play.

Overall, I think we agree. XJ is a net positive, OFF THE BALL player for IU.
 
We’re all good. I’m sure Insider understands my sentiment, which is largely in jest.

I think IU has found their niche of late without XJ. You can state overall record since injury, but not really an apt comparison since Pitt benched Hugley since we did so with so scrub games to work out the kinks while IU was in the middle of conference play.

Overall, I think we agree. XJ is a net positive, OFF THE BALL player for IU.
I actually think he is fine on the ball. I like having two guys that can advance the floor and key the offense if needed. X is probably more point than off guard but I would view him more as a combo on offense that guards the 1 on D.

One of the funnier truths about this present Pitt team is that Burton is really the point guard and Cummings is better off the ball and hunting shots (you see it in games like today where the more physical and long teams can alter his play significantly when he is on the ball). But, having them both to take heat off of each other and set the offense at times really helps. IU has a similar situation with JHS and Johnson is only a benefit to them even if Johnson is the one better situated to play off the ball.
 
I actually think he is fine on the ball. I like having two guys that can advance the floor and key the offense if needed. X is probably more point than off guard but I would view him more as a combo on offense that guards the 1 on D.

One of the funnier truths about this present Pitt team is that Burton is really the point guard and Cummings is better off the ball and hunting shots (you see it in games like today where the more physical and long teams can alter his play significantly when he is on the ball). But, having them both to take heat off of each other and set the offense at times really helps. IU has a similar situation with JHS and Johnson is only a benefit to them even if Johnson is the one better situated to play off the ball.
Appreciate your explanation and take. We’ll see.

To me, XJ is too polarizing. Too inconsistent. Still. As a 5th year player. He can win or lose you a game. Hence, I don’t see IU beyond the Sweet 16.
 
I appreciate your positivity, yet still think you were kicked in the head by a goat while not wearing a helmet…
What you bb savants seem not to comprehend is that what I’m saying is that Big John if healthy and in shape would be an asset to this team . I’m not suggesting that the offense should run through him or even that he starts over Fede . I hope he comes back next yr healthy and ready to play and we’ll see who’s right .
 
What you bb savants seem not to comprehend is that what I’m saying is that Big John if healthy and in shape would be an asset to this team . I’m not suggesting that the offense should run through him or even that he starts over Fede . I hope he comes back next yr healthy and ready to play and we’ll see who’s right .
Meh time for him to move on and wish him well.
 
What you bb savants seem not to comprehend is that what I’m saying is that Big John if healthy and in shape would be an asset to this team . I’m not suggesting that the offense should run through him or even that he starts over Fede . I hope he comes back next yr healthy and ready to play and we’ll see who’s right .
He’s not playing because he doesn’t help this team
That’s it that’s the list
He’s not injured
He just couldn’t cope with his new Nate santos like role and flaked out

He either accepts his a bench/role player at pitt moving forward or he moves one

Place your bets
I’m heavy on the latter
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT