I have a legitimate question.
- Thread starter bobfree
- Start date
the person in the oval office can never admit he made a mistake
The White House doesn’t want any migrants here, legal or otherwise. By making an example of this poor guy, they’ll scare and intimidate others to either stay away or leave. Then they will go after their political opponents.
If you’re talking about the Maryland “Father”. He is an illegal and had a deportation order. He’s also with MS13
What part of he’s here illegally is difficult to grasp ? No one is above the law
Your projection is thick.
Either the courts get to decide who is a “violent criminal” or “gang member”, or dotard donny gets to decide.
That choice determines whether we are a Republic governed by laws or an autocracy living under a ruler.
You hate this country its evident
Its okay. I understand its legal for you to burn the flag i just dont understand why you do it.
Overlooking the fact that the supreme court ruled 9-0 that the administration had to do everything necessary to return him. I am not going to debate whether he is a gang member or not. (No indication he is.) He had legal standing here and was deported. End of story. Trump doesn't get to rule by decree and blatantly ignore the supreme court. This isn't even a partisan issue...unless you are part of the cult
2 courts ruled him a gang member, one being the appellate court.
Why do you oppose the rule of law?
Can't find American minorities being mistreated [50 years of DEI] so they use deported gang members. Get his kids out of the school as well, before the bar has to be lowered for them.
Now read above and try to comprehend the level of idiocy of your Fox rotted brain.
Your pretzel logic doesnt overrule 2 judges. Why wont you follow the rule of law? We must follow a judges orders right? So 2 judges ruled he is an MS guy.
Seems you only want to listen to judges when its conveinent for you to do so.
Thats not healthy for our country
The cop who initially attested to Abrego Garcia's alleged MS-13 membership was subsequently suspended and indicted for serious professional misconduct.
Now I could explain to you how the court system works in a way you might understand but I don't have any crayons.
Haven’t visited for awhile, but I already knew who here would be convinced he is a gang member versus who would be convinced he isn’t. lol
I think what’s right and wrong here depends on that fact. That piece is not an opinion. So with all the info at our disposal, is he or isn’t he? (And I don’t mean what Caturd or some shit is saying). I mean if that fact wasn’t tied to strengthening or weakening an argument, what is this guys real background?
Because otherwise it’s silly to debate the right response. Because all you are doing it inserting the unknown variable to make your argument right.
(And I know the Supreme Court piece and what is legally right. I’m just saying that most logical peoples’ opinion about whether it was good to get rid of him or not, rests on that unknown variable)
I think what’s right and wrong here depends on that fact. That piece is not an opinion. So with all the info at our disposal, is he or isn’t he? (And I don’t mean what Caturd or some shit is saying). I mean if that fact wasn’t tied to strengthening or weakening an argument, what is this guys real background?
Because otherwise it’s silly to debate the right response. Because all you are doing it inserting the unknown variable to make your argument right.
(And I know the Supreme Court piece and what is legally right. I’m just saying that most logical peoples’ opinion about whether it was good to get rid of him or not, rests on that unknown variable)
Gang member aside he WAS here illegally making him a criminal. No one is above the law
Yeah, but I'm think sending him to that place on that fact alone might be an 8th amendment issue.
If he was caught doing really bad stuff, sure send him away.
Logical people should be more concerned about whether he was afforded due process. Otherwise what prevents the same logical people from having the same thing done to them?
He's been arguing against his point. It's obviously all so confusing for him once he ran out of his idiotic Fox "news" talking points.
I think this is the main point and many are missing it.
Because they don't think it could happen to them...until it does, then they cry wolf.
Being in the US illegally is a civil offense, not a criminal offense. The guy has never been charged with a crime in either El Salvador or the United States.
Keep in mind the law and order crowd also thinks attacking capitol police officers on Jan 6th is justifiable. So ignoring the 9-0 supreme court decision is also acceptable.
And voting for a rapist felon...today's maga RINOs: no morals or values.
You cant keep up with your own b.s. and you are having comprehension issues again.
You said he wasnt a gang member but 2 judges said he was. You are ignoring what 2 judges ruled. There is 10 tons of irony there.
I think it's time for you to take a timeout. You have either gone completely delusional or no longer understand the English language.
Either way, no I didn't saying anything of the sort. Yes, you are arguing with yourself.
Trump Admin Deports Teen With No Criminal Record to El Salvador Prison: Report
Merwil Gutiérrez’s father said ICE agents knew his son was not a target but arrested him anyway
I have no opinion on what’s true and what’s not in this case. I don’t know. I’m not a legal scholar and I’m guessing no one else in this thread either.
However, in regards to your statement about the SC ruling that the administration do everything necessary returning him is simply not true if you are to believe CNN’s legal expert.
