It was a bad kick. It was supposed to go down the middle.I was in 513 - You could see only one Pitt player would have a chance to be in position to make a tackle BEFORE the Tech returner even caught the kickoff.
It was a bad kick. It was supposed to go down the middle.
Guys are still supposed to stay in their lanes regardless of where the kick goes . Our guys didn't
This explanation, from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:I was in 513 - You could see only one Pitt player would have a chance to be in position to make a tackle BEFORE the Tech returner even caught the kickoff.
Bad kick, missed tackle, terrible job by everyone else after the missed tackle. And not that it really mattered, but looked like a pretty clear block in the back at about the Pitt 20-25 yard line. I don't have much faith in our kick and punt coverage teams right now.
Well I do think you're right there. But that's still not good IMHO. Like yesterday, guy on GT doesn't fair catch... should've gotten rocked and would've been really hard to hang onto the ball. Instead the tackle is missed. Didn't get far, but there was still a missed tackle.I disagree on punt coverage. Our gunners always get to their return man very quickly and it has been very infrequent for a second guy to miss a tackle if the first on whiffs.