And this off-season you hired away Pat Narduzzi from Pitt to rebuild your program, would you be excited with that hire? If you're being honest, you wouldn't be.
Look, Pats going to have a couple years to turn this around and there is a debate about whether he's earned that or not.
I made an earlier thread about how is overall tenure has been a success. Having said that his decision making this year and overall state of the his staff and talent on this team leave serious questions.
Couple that with what seems to be lagging fundraising, poor attendance, and lack luster recruiting the future for the rest of his tenure isn't that encouraging.
Back to my original point, he wouldn't be one of the top 50 candidates to lead a turnaround at another school but we will charge him to lead ours.
Look, Pats going to have a couple years to turn this around and there is a debate about whether he's earned that or not.
I made an earlier thread about how is overall tenure has been a success. Having said that his decision making this year and overall state of the his staff and talent on this team leave serious questions.
Couple that with what seems to be lagging fundraising, poor attendance, and lack luster recruiting the future for the rest of his tenure isn't that encouraging.
Back to my original point, he wouldn't be one of the top 50 candidates to lead a turnaround at another school but we will charge him to lead ours.
