NET Ratings?

[DC_Area_Panther]

What BS! NET gives teams overall rankings. Then, at selection time, the committee goes into the weeds underlying the NET rankings and selects teams out of NET order (sometimes well out of order) based on very questionable in the weeds criteria which should have already been factored into the NET rankings.

 

[DC_Area_Panther]

ACC for example--

UNC. #8
Duke # 10
Clemson #34
Pitt #40
Wake Forest #43
UVA #54

UVA jumped two--the appearance is of gross bias at play.

If the NCAA is going to use NET rankings they should mean something. If they don't mean anything, then the NCAA should not post them-- just publish the underlying data alphabetically by team if that is what they are going to use.