Harve74 posted on 2/9/2015...
Goat, in programs that are quite successful in the major revenue sports, a hands-on, activist AD who sets specific goals for the coaches as you describe would last in his job until shortly after the first phone call from the head coach to the university president or whoever the decision maker is on the Board of Trustees.
Can you imagine an AD calling Saban or Urban Meyer into his office and assigning goals?
Well, maybe you can because your mental orientation is autocratic to the point of fascism. But, in the real world, the head coach of a top program will tell the AD what to do, not the other way around. You do remember the OSU president's quote when asked if he would fire Tressel, right? Something like , "No, I just hope Coach Tressel doesn't fire me."
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Well Harve you may be right when you talk about Saban, Tressell, or Meyer but I can promise the former coaches at Florida, Nebraska, Michigan, etc. had lots of conversations with their AD. Things went well for Tressell with no AD or U oversight???
You might want to read the article in the link below which stresses the importance of putting the AD's back in charge of U athletic programs. Harve time is moving on so catch up!
www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/06/
college-athletic-
scandals...
http://www.bing.com/search?q=huffin...&ghc=2&cvid=b196505e30d244d7808aa206febe8f76#
I bet ex the elite coaches the AD is very involved in the goings on for most programs!
I'll also venture a guess that Coach Kelly at the prestigious ND gets lots of chances to have encounters with the ND AD since things have gone off the rails a bit for the ND program.
My neighbor is a Nit Wit U "super booster" and from what he tells me coach Franklin has had the opportunity to sit in the AD's office for a few post game day chats.
I also bet Paterno probably " ran" Nit Wit U which is exactly how the U athletic programs get in trouble.
When the U fb HC is larger than the U bad things are likely to happen.
Schools that ended up in big trouble probably had a " hands off" AD.
I think things are changing given the increased focus of the NCAA on U athletic programs.
For the average U ( which is most of them) you can bet the AD is managing his or her business area (the athletic program) and not giving the coaches "carte blanche."
Go Pitt!
This post was edited on 2/9 11:19 AM by goat123
This post was edited on 2/9 11:20 AM by goat123
This post was edited on 2/9 12:24 PM by goat123
This post was edited on 2/9 1:18 PM by goat123
This post was edited on 2/9 2:36 PM by goat123