If that’s the case, he’ll be back at Alabama next year.
i think the OP has been trolling lately.
dude, Im a fan but the best in CF after 9 quarters ? ok
Unfortunately . Freakin NIL .If that’s the case, he’ll be back at Alabama next year.
Unfortunately . Freakin NIL .
Today Holstein is bailing Bell out, forget these trick plays when the defense is getting so much penetration, really poor play calling, the flea-flicker, reverse, even the TD pass, fake jet sweep brought the OLB right into Holstein's face.
🤡🥾Hey, let's trick them all the way into winning. 0 for 3, Kade.
Yup. He has that it factor. He has a ways to develop but he has a good chance to be a special player especially in bells offenseHolstein plays like the Roethlisbergers, Allens, etc. in the sense that is he very good in the pocket and at extending plays looking to throw down field. His arm has room to get stronger but he is a lot of fun to watch.
well anyone can post anything. this is a gem.Breakingpitt.....just admit it without being a clown. Either that or you are a psu fan. The kid is doing awesome. Grow up you bitch
He called three trick plays that didn't work. Are you denying that, you dolt? You don't even know what you're trying to dispute.
Do you understand that even plays that don't work give the defense another look to be aware of the rest of the game?He called three trick plays that didn't work. Are you denying that, you dolt? You don't even know what you're trying to dispute.
🤡🥾. After your melt down last week it’s rich for you to be calling anyone a doltHe called three trick plays that didn't work. Are you denying that, you dolt? You don't even know what you're trying to dispute.
Hes clueless. Hes the board KarenDo you understand that even plays that don't work give the defense another look to be aware of the rest of the game?
Hes clueless. Hes the board Karen
I never used the term bait. I guess you answered my question, though. You don't understand the cumulative impact play-calling.Yeah, that flea flicker was to bait 'em for... what, exactly? I'm sure Bell would do it again if given the choice, lol. I'll let you and NCPitt return to your MENSA meeting.
- Karen
I never used the term bait. I guess you answered my question, though. You don't understand the cumulative impact play-calling.
To an extent, but you also need the plays to set up the gadget plays in the first place. Without any ground game to speak of today, there was no room for those types of trick plays in the offense. In the right spots they are good calls, today was not the right time for them.Do you understand that even plays that don't work give the defense another look to be aware of the rest of the game?
Most teams develop their keys on their opponent's previous games. The gadgets didn't work today, but the plays to set them existed in games 1-2. Now future teams will have to be aware of these gadgets too.To an extent, but you also need the plays to set up the gadget plays in the first place. Without any ground game to speak of today, there was no room for those types of trick plays in the offense. In the right spots they are good calls, today was not the right time for them.
Sure, he will say it with 20/20 hindsight. But he called them in the moment with some intent in mind.They were poor calls when the line was collapsing almost every down. He would tell you that himself. And that was meant to be posted in the game thread anyway.