I certainly respect your opinion but we just don't see the game the same on that front. I don't agree that Crosby or Malkin shrinks in the big moments. In fact, I think they tend to play their best in the big moments.
This is a pretty big moment, no? How many guys in the history of the sport have a "big moment" that compares to this one?
What about this?
How about these?
Do they always come through? Of course not, nobody does. I can prove that just about anybody is a playoff choker by using the methodology that people use to prove Crosby is a choker.
For example, Wayne Gretzky never won the Cup after leaving Edmonton. Did he forget how to win too or was it something else?
Does Crosby (and Malkin) need to score more in this series? Absolutely they do. However, people hold them to a ridiculous standard that they don't hold the Ovechkin's and the Toews's and the Kane's and the Kopitar's of the world to and personally I think it's ridiculous and unfair.
I can't say this enough. Sometimes we have lost because he hasn't played well enough. That has definitely happened and I'm not arguing otherwise. However, FAR more often than not, when we have lost, it's been because of breakdowns - and sometimes SEVERE breakdowns - elsewhere that he was not quite brilliant enough to overcome.
Hockey is a game of depth. Teams are going to sell out to stop the big guns and if they devote that many resources to stopping 87 and 71, they are going to succeed. That's just how it goes. Incidentally, that is also how it went for 66 and 68 in their respective primes. You need other guys to step up. When that happens, you are going to be successful. When it doesn't happen, you are going to lose and it's just that simple.
Did you know that over the past 27 years the No. 1 overall pick has won just five Stanley Cups and Patrick Kane has three of them. Crosby and Fleury have the other two. It takes more than elite top end talent - A LOT more.
However, as we have seen with Chicago in recent years, if the depth players continue to contribute and keep the ball rolling, eventually the big guns will also get going. If they don't we are going to lose. However, I just refuse to blame every loss on our best players. I just don't agree with that line of thinking. It's like when college football fans blame every single loss on the coach or the quarterback. I mean sure it happens but not typically.
Crosby may have been our third best player last night after Murray and Letang. He was again dominating in the face-off circle - winning approximately 68 percent of his face-offs mostly against Nickolas Backstrom, arguably one of the top face-off specialists in the league - and he was setting up guys left and right. We just couldn't finish.
Who made the pass to Letang that he rang off the post? Crosby.
Who made the gorgeous drop pass to Sheary that he shanked way wide? Crosby.
Who is winning every board battle he engages in? Crosby.
He does need to score more but to suggest he isn't playing well is incorrect. He's playing very well against a very tough assignment.