Wow. So much misinformation on this thread. I don't even know where to begin.
I also think that township’s commissioners have made a lot of mistakes. Honestly, South Fayette should be a case study for how to mismanage a wonderful asset.
However, unlike Pine, their commercial development simply has not kept pace with their population explosion and that has led to some incredibly high taxes.
The commissioners had nothing to do with the management or mismanagement of Newbury Market. That was the shady developers led by Brett Malky who owned the land.
While it is true that the residential development in South Fayette has outpaced commercial development, that is because the nature of the township is primarily residential. There are only a few areas that are suitable for commercial development, mainly in the Rt 50 and I 79 area. A lot of that has had business / industrial parks built. Newbury is a brownfield site so that impacts building considerations and the old movie theater site next to the Children's Hospital facility was previously undermined posing some building issues
As to taxes, they are in the same ballpark as several surrounding communities. Yes, everyone would love lower taxes - but saying they are incredibly high is false.
I’ve heard there’s discussions about the southern beltway going through there one day so perhaps that could help. Did the fact that it was an old Koppers site detract some folks away? It just seems like that site had so much potential; they could treat the entrance to the shopping area as a town square since South Fayette Twp pretty much lacks one right now. Would make for a great entrance coming into the township off of 79.
It is just not discussion about the Southern Beltway - it has been under construction for the last couple of years on the border of South Fayette. And besides TopGolf and Carvana and 84 Lumber in the main part of Newbury Market, there was a group of shops built right off of 79 as the entrance to Newbury Market. The problem is the developers wanted a second anchor tenant which they have not been able to attract and the market the last 5 years has been terrible for retail - which would have made up most of the rest of the site.
I do recall hearing - it may have just been a rumor, maybe not - that the various environmental issues with the site ultimately scared off UPMC. Not sure how many hospitals are built on Superfund sites.
UPMC pulling out had zero to do with environmental issues. After their plans were approved, UPMC changed direction and decided to build the 3 specialty hospitals in the future rather than a couple of the smaller hospitals like the one they planned in South Fayette. Simply a different allocation of resources.
Apparently the soil is so bad that no one is allowed to have a vegetable garden. Plus the traffic is horrible.
LOL Are you out of your mind. There is no one living in the area that was the brownfield site - which is the only area of questionable soil given it used to be a chemical facility. Hence why it was designed for commercial development. There are no restrictions on vegetable gardens in South Fayette
As to traffic, traffic is not an issue except at rush hour. Then the Rt 50 and I79 area can get quite backed up, mainly due to people from multiple communities using the I79 Bridgeville exit. There is a multi year traffic improvement program that has been underway to help alleviate that by adding two extra lanes off the I79 exit, syncing traffic lights, expanding the bridge into Bridgeville to 7 lanes, etc, etc.