Dang. I know SF has a great fanbase and the Rams are new but they just won the Super Bowl. I dont think I've ever seen a road crowd like this. It literally looks like there's no Rams fans at all in their own stadium.
Karma evens it out for us in Pittsburgh, because of our baseball's team ownership. Luckily we've had the Penguins, so 2 out 3 ain't bad.Most of you guys are Steelers fans but when you complain, just think about how much worse you could have it, lol
I will say sometimes road crowds look a little inflated because the camera is usually facing the road side (just like it’s worse for empties at Heinz).
At NFL games there is no such thing as a "road side" as far as the fans are concerned. Teams do not set aside thousands of tickets for away fans like they do in college. In the NFL the whole stadium is the "home side".
Next thing you know, SMF will be calling for them to ban tailgating.And I dont think they give any tickets to the visitor at all, maybe just a few tickets per players for their wives and kids. This is a policy they should change though. They should give visitors 5K or so tickets and have it heavily guarded like in Europe and ban visiting fans (defined as someone wearing the gear of that team) in the rest of the stadium....like in Europe. People cannot control themselves or their liquor anymore.
At NFL games there is no such thing as a "road side" as far as the fans are concerned. Teams do not set aside thousands of tickets for away fans like they do in college. In the NFL the whole stadium is the "home side".
Yep, even the lightly attended game for road teams have most of the fans on the lower level behind the visitor's bench. The San Francisco crowd was the largest away contingent for a Steelers game and no one has even been close to that amount. Oddly enough it was also one of the quietest visitor crowds as well. Not much cheering until the game was out of control in the fourth.Missed the point. There is a propensity for fans of the road team to buy tickets on the secondary market behind the side where their team bench is.
For the most part, that side is on the far side of the main camera. A few exceptions (NE, CLE) come to mind. But you see the visitor fans more for that reason.
Missed the point. There is a propensity for fans of the road team to buy tickets on the secondary market behind the side where their team bench is.
For the most part, that side is on the far side of the main camera. A few exceptions (NE, CLE) come to mind. But you see the visitor fans more for that reason.
I think there's some elements of the Steelers fans dynamic at play, like when the Steelers fans take over the stadium in say, Arizona or Houston, the announcers say that ''Steelers fans travel well", when they aren't traveling, those people live there year-round. I know of this group of four 49ers fans that went to the game in Pittsburgh, posted pictures of themselves on Facebook in their 49ers jersey, they did travel, they traveled from their lifelong home, in Baltimore, they just became 49ers fans, probably in the 80s, when the 9ers where good and Baltimore had no team.
You are right, but the 49er seriously looked 90%-95% red. That's just too many Niner fans for the Rams side to look much different.
BTW, I didnt buy that Pitt/PSU panorama they did because they ALWAYS take that shot of the visitor sideline where most of the visiting fans sit. It was probably like 70/30 Pitt on the PSU sideline but that was still too much for me to hang up in the man cave