I don't have an issue with Walker being traded. Based on what the pirates try to do, they could use someone with a little more range at second (as long as that is what gets put there)
I am struggling with why we traded for Neis, when we could have kept Happ for just a little more money. Happ was lights out down the stretch. Unless the pirates truly believed he could not sustain that, but there was no indication that he couldn't. Unless I am missing something.
Uncle Ray can't fix everyone and not all of his attempts were successful. So can anyone tell me why Keeping Happ for 12M who pitched unbelievably well in Aug and Sept was not as good as keeping Neis who didn't have a great year last year?
Happ has been good for about two months. Prior to those two months, his career has actually been largely worse than Niese's. So, with Niese, the Bucs get a younger pitcher with similar upside to Happ who has had more sustained success throughout his career. And, if he stinks (doubtful), the Bucs can dump him after year one. If he is great, the Bucs have him for three years with his options (at a cheaper rate than Happ's). The Blue Jays are stuck with Happ for three years, regardless of if he maintains his late-2015 form or if he reverts back closer to his career averages.