ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Rumor UPMC expanding

They are involved concerning the merger speculation.

Involved in speculation, or actually involved in discussions? The first is obviously true, the second wouldn't surprise me but obviously isn't something being discussed openly at this point. It is still an odd purge at the top of Pinnacle. It doesn't fit the MO of prior UPMC mergers but there is obviously something going on there.
 
Missed opportunity for the University to attract new students to the University.
With Pitt and UPMC bonded together it is free advertising for all.
Pitt for students and UPMC for employees (nurses and other medical degrees).

A follow-up FYI that is interesting, the trademark "UPMC" is actually owned by the University (Pitt). UPMC owns "Life Changing Medicine," "Stat MedEvac," etc, but they don't technically own the trademark to their own name.

The university technically licenses the use of the wordmark to them.
 
Last edited:
Digging a little deeper, apparently Michael Young, Pinnacle's now former CEO, "resigned" from Lancaster General after 16 years in 2004 because of rehab for alcohol. This story could be more about personal demons than Pinnacle's strategy moving forward. Pinnacle's CIO and CMO also apparently have recently resigned, so it could just be a general purge of leadership. Very unusual for such a sudden departure though, and a lot seemingly going on behind the scenes.

I sat next to Michael Young at a scholarship dinner my freshman year and he got me my first real job as a pharmacy tech at LGH (was a pharmacy major at the time). Extremely nice guy and a proud Pitt alum. He helped transform LGH into the regional health care giant it is today.
 
Last edited:
Sad story if true. I sat next to Michael Young at a scholarship dinner my freshman year and he got me my first real job as a pharmacy tech at LGH (was a pharmacy major at the time). Extremely nice guy and a proud Pitt alum. He helped transform LGH into the regional health care giant it is today.

Let me emphasize that his problems, which were documented publicly, were in the past and I have no idea if this has anything to do with the present. In fact, there seems to be a general purge at the top of Pinnacle, so I probably would lean to the fact that he was just caught up in that.
 
Let me emphasize that his problems, which were documented publicly, were in the past and I have no idea if this has anything to do with the present. In fact, there seems to be a general purge at the top of Pinnacle, so I probably would lean to the fact that he was just caught up in that.

True. He has been very effective everywhere he has been.

He was a big proponent of a failed attempt to merge Pinnacle and Hershey Med Center.
 
Digging a little deeper, apparently Michael Young, Pinnacle's now former CEO, "resigned" from Lancaster General after 16 years in 2004 because of rehab for alcohol. This story could be more about personal demons than Pinnacle's strategy moving forward. Pinnacle's CIO and CMO also apparently have recently resigned, so it could just be a general purge of leadership. Very unusual for such a sudden departure though, and a lot seemingly going on behind the scenes.

He's successfully run three hospitals since 2004, including the 16th and 35th largest hospitals in the United States. He was the architect behind rescuing Atlanta's Grady Memorial Hospital - potentially the most important hospital in the South - from complete collapse. Mike is a very successful (and generous) Pitt grad and a good man. Your speculation regarding his life is unwarranted and incorrect.
 
He's successfully run three hospitals since 2004, including the 16th and 35th largest hospitals in the United States. He was the architect behind rescuing Atlanta's Grady Memorial Hospital - potentially the most important hospital in the South - from complete collapse. Mike is a very successful (and generous) Pitt grad and a good man. Your speculation regarding his life is unwarranted and incorrect.

Might be incorrect, but it certainly wasn't unwarranted. That's not a personal attack on him, but it is public information and when someone in a high profile position is removed that suddenly and without warning, it is certainly warranted speculation as to one of several possibilities as to why he was so suddenly removed. In light of the other turnovers at Pinnacle, as I said elsewhere, that is probably not the cause. I hope not. I have no ill will towards a Pitt grad who has been quite successful in his career and appears to have successfully overcome his problems. I'd have no ill will for him if he didn't, either, but nothing is in this thread that isn't available with a simple Google search or wasn't already being talked about at PennLive.
 
Last edited:
Might be incorrect, but it certainly wasn't unwarranted. That's not a personal attache on him, but it is public information and when something happens that suddenly, it is certainly warranted speculation. In light of the other removals at Pinnacle, as I said elsewhere, that is probably not the cause.

No, it was completely off base. You did a quick google search and saw that he suffered from a disease nearly 15 years ago. You speculated that this disease may have had something to do with a professional decision - to which you were not privy and you don't understand - that occurred today. He's successfully run several large hospitals since 2004, including turning around one that was in such bad shape that its mere survival, let alone comeback, was deemed impossible. There were no facts at all that supported your claim of a potential recurrence of "personal demons." Indeed, all available facts suggested the opposite. You posted it because it was sensational.

I will add that not only are you incorrect, that kind of speculation is seriously damaging to people who struggle with dependency. People don't seek treatment because they fear that once their problem is public, they will be labeled as a reprobate even 15 years later. They don't get the help they need and the problem gets worse and does additional damage to them and the people around them.

There was no reason to dig up a 15 year old personal issue and try to tie it into a career which been extremely successful. Especially with respect to a loyal Pitt guy who gives a lot of his time and money to the school.
 
No, it was completely off base. You did a quick google search and saw that he suffered from a disease nearly 15 years ago. You speculated that this disease may have had something to do with a professional decision - to which you were not privy and you don't understand - that occurred today. He's successfully run several large hospitals since 2004, including turning around one that was in such bad shape that its mere survival, let alone comeback, was deemed impossible. There were no facts at all that supported your claim of a potential recurrence of "personal demons." Indeed, all available facts suggested the opposite. You posted it because it was sensational.

I will add that not only are you incorrect, that kind of speculation is seriously damaging to people who struggle with dependency. People don't seek treatment because they fear that once their problem is public, they will be labeled as a reprobate even 15 years later. They don't get the help they need and the problem gets worse and does additional damage to them and the people around them.

There was no reason to dig up a 15 year old personal issue and try to tie it into a career which been extremely successful. Especially with respect to a loyal Pitt guy who gives a lot of his time and money to the school.

No, I posted it because it was a possibility based on public knowledge.

There are other things that can cause immediate firings...things like embezzlement, sexual harassment...or there could be serious other health issues....all sorts of things that could be speculated about, but none of those are in his personal public history. You made your point. I'll pretend there is no history because he is a generous Pitt guy.

And I never said his career wasn't successful...way more successful than mine and I've not had to overcome what he had to... but I don't see what that has to do with any of it.
 
Last edited:
No, I posted it because it was a possibility based on public knowledge.

There are other things that can cause immediate firings...things like embezzlement, sexual harassment...or there could be serious other health issues....all sorts of things that could be speculated about, but none of those are in his personal public history. You made your point. I'll pretend there is no history because he is a generous Pitt guy.
the closest thing you'll get to an apology or an admittance of being wrong from paco..
 
the closest thing you'll get to an apology or an admittance of being wrong from paco..
wow-that-really-ap7nkq.jpg
 

It's sort of ironic your handle is Kelli Taylor. Private issues of teenage athletes, coaches, celebrities, and politicians get speculated on all the time on discussion boards, but speculation on the applicability of issues that are a matters of public record for medical center COOs (and that were disclosed publicly by the said individual) are apparently off limits.

I'm happy the worst case scenario is not true in this instance. I'm happy to edit out all references to this history if people want to delete their subsequent posts. That way, when people do a google search, they'll be sure to only run into the published newspaper articles, published as recently as Friday, that mention this history.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT