ADVERTISEMENT

ot: your reaction to the news the pirates are quitting pittsburgh

Your 7 year old can be out past 5 pm there mrs soccer mom.

With over protective parenting like this, we wonder why our kids are growing up as helpless adults. SMH.

Cut the chord soufie
He is out past 5-
Playing on the street with neighborhood kids.

Yes- in the city (gasp!) because we don’t have to shelter him into some isolated place.

Ya know doing Kid stuff.

You’re bad at this .
Yes- he also goes to city public school and aftercare - since his parents work.

Want to compare cords? (Correct spelling - unless you meant musical)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeldas Open Roof
He is out past 5-
Playing on the street with neighborhood kids.

Yes- in the city (gasp!) because we don’t have to shelter him into some isolated place.

Ya know doing Kid stuff.

You’re bad at this .
Yes- he also goes to city public school and aftercare - since his parents work.

Want to compare cords? (Correct spelling - unless you meant musical)

Side note -
Had to retrieve him for dinner at 7 since I told him to go outside around noon today .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeldas Open Roof
He is out past 5-
Playing on the street with neighborhood kids.

Yes- in the city (gasp!) because we don’t have to shelter him into some isolated place.

Ya know doing Kid stuff.

You’re bad at this .
Yes- he also goes to city public school and aftercare - since his parents work.
You are a good man souf, I mean it. We disagree about kickoff times, no biggey.

I take two kids to pitt games so my drinking til I see three of everything days are over. But for the record, I enjoyed that in my younger days.

I just like later afternoon kickoff times. Gives the dads (like us) time to do youth sports and family duties and attend a game too. Pitt fans have alit of excuses, 3:30 or 6 pm kickoff times gives us less chances to stay home.

Plus I hate sitting in noon day sun. I’m anti sun, call me weird but I love shade. That’s it man, I think later afternoon games gets more butts in seats at Heinz. I really think, all things being equal, a 3:30 pm gsme gets 3k-4K then a noon game would. Again, all things being equal.
 
You are a good man souf, I mean it. We disagree about kickoff times, no biggey.

I take two kids to pitt games so my drinking til I see three of everything days are over. But for the record, I enjoyed that in my younger days.

I just like later afternoon kickoff times. Gives the dads (like us) time to do youth sports and family duties and attend a game too. Pitt fans have alit of excuses, 3:30 or 6 pm kickoff times gives us less chances to stay home.

Plus I hate sitting in noon day sun. I’m anti sun, call me weird but I love shade. That’s it man, I think later afternoon games gets more butts in seats at Heinz.
Upgrade to club seats

Like we did years ago
Problem solved no sun,no rain -
Just convenient food and bathrooms .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeldas Open Roof
Upgrade to club seats

Like we did years ago
Problem solved no sun,no rain -
Just convenient food and bathrooms .
Love, LOVE the club seats. You are living the dream.

And for the record, I don’t want to see your cord nor do I want to show you mine.
 
Last edited:
If you take away Pittsburgh’s sports teams, what is the draw as a city?

I think Pittsburgh would be just fine without the Pirates.

I was at a taco festival today that probably had 5,000 people through out the day. I passed brewpubs and other establishments and they seemed packed. The Marathon got tons of good press on how great the city is.

I’m not a Pittsburgh is heaven guy. As a matter of fact, if I could switch my house and job to the South I would do it in an instant. But people that visit here love it, and it’s doing quite well. Just recently I saw Crime is at a 15 year low or something, the cities finances and unemployment are where you want them to be, and with major construction projects happening over the next 3 years there is lots to be excited about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BFo8 and Ski11585
The Pirates have no chance of winning a pennant as long as Nutting is in charge. It would better to see them leave for a couple years, and then get another Major League team a few years later with better ownership. A guy like Mark Cuban and/or others would step up. The Pirates have a good history and people around MLB know Nutting for what he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue Goose and BFo8
From a national image, the Pirates are more important than the Steelers.

Visited Buffalo lately?

Penguins would not have been a loss.
 
I rag on baseball with the best of them, but I wouldnt say baseball is dying. MLB is still the 2nd or 3rd richest sports league in the world, even ahead of my beloved EPL. The baseball owners may not like April attendance and think that the speed of play is not attractive for millennials with short attention spans...but MLB isn’t going anywhere. Except maybe in Pittsburgh, where the owner has no passion for bringing winning baseball to the city. If he were smart, and he is, he’d look to move the Pirates. Sad but true.

And as far as following the Pirates if they move...the only thing likable about them is that they are from Pittsburgh. Take that away and they are just another team in a dull sport.

I don't care what city you move the Pirates to, if you have 23 losing seasons out of 26 and no Division Titles let alone WS titles in that same time frame, and don't financially give your team a chance to win, attendance will be abysmal.

Honestly, its amazing the buccos get the attendance they get and when the 3 years they were winning Nutting rewarded the record attendance with dismantling and not adding to a legit WS roster and team. That he caught lightening in a bottle with because the ownership sure as heck didn't try to build those Cutch lead teams.
 
I know that and you know what I mean. Pitt has to play at 1:00 or earlier until October. If not for the Pirates, some of those games would have started at 3:30 or later.


But how often does that actually happen? Maybe once some years. Never more than twice. And some year no times at all. I mean it's not like the only time we get noon games is when there is a conflict with an evening Pirates game. We are just as likely to get a nooner in October or November long after the Pirates have put away the bats for the winter.

The fact is that we have been in leagues (plural) that have a lot of noon time slots to fill, and we have not, for the most part, been one of the teams that "demands" the better time slots based on our play on the field. Play better, get better game time slots. Bumble along like we have been, keep getting the short end of the stick. It really is that simple.
 
But how often does that actually happen? Maybe once some years. Never more than twice. And some year no times at all. I mean it's not like the only time we get noon games is when there is a conflict with an evening Pirates game. We are just as likely to get a nooner in October or November long after the Pirates have put away the bats for the winter.

The fact is that we have been in leagues (plural) that have a lot of noon time slots to fill, and we have not, for the most part, been one of the teams that "demands" the better time slots based on our play on the field. Play better, get better game time slots. Bumble along like we have been, keep getting the short end of the stick. It really is that simple.

It happens twice per year on average.

September home games are huge for this programs for various reasons:

- good weather
- usually play a decent OOC team
- Pitt hasn't Pitted away the season yet

Tennessee, Wisconsin, and WVU come in in a few years and the Pirates will get to select our game time. If they are home, we will be on at noon.
 
We are referring to kick off times. With perhaps one or at most two exception each season, we do NOT determine our own kickoff times. We play whenever the television people tell us to play. When the TV people say nooner on the Ocho, we play at noon and the game is on the Ocho. When they say 8:00 on ESPN, we play at 8:00 on ESPN. When they say Thursday, we play on Thursday.

And that makes us exactly the same as every other P5 school.
Well yeah, but if you play an attractive opponent on a date that the stinking Pirates are playing a night game then the networks are boxed in...this has happened a boat load of times. Pitt pays a price for playing on the Northside.
 
Well it is the obvious dream of so many Pitt fans because they believe then Pitt will become the dominant entity and stadiums will fill and greatness will follow. Which is completely misguided.
I hate this mindset and I do see it on here and it's so naïve.. If the pens suck, if the steelers suck, if the pirates move, everyone in western PA will jump on the pitt bandwagon. The city will give Heinz to pitt and every game will be a sell out..

So ridiculous..
 
It would be great for Pitt. We could choose our own home game times, have 1 less pro team to compete with for fan hearts and minds, and could convert PNC Park into a fabulous college football stadium similar to what Georgia State did to Turner Field but better. Baseball is a dying sport anyway. Please let this happen!
Never happen, but you're pretty right on about this. Except the start times. As long as we're mediocre, we'll stil get noon starts more often than not
 
Never happen, but you're pretty right on about this. Except the start times. As long as we're mediocre, we'll stil get noon starts more often than not
you see, that's where I take offense. I've researched (OK, that's a strong word, I looked it up) and many more inferior programs in the acc were getting much better (aka 3:30pm) time slots.. I really think there is more to it than just pitt being blah and getting noon times, I really do.

I don't want to go all conspiracy theory here but I don't think the acc does the newcomer any favors..
 
I hate this mindset and I do see it on here and it's so naïve.. If the pens suck, if the steelers suck, if the pirates move, everyone in western PA will jump on the pitt bandwagon. The city will give Heinz to pitt and every game will be a sell out..

So ridiculous..
Not ridiculous, at least in the 80s. We had a juicy window when the Steelers fell back somewhat, were losing some games 51-0 and such and using guys like Rich Erenberg and Loopy Sanchez as starters. Pitt stupidly chose to cut off the booster spigot at the same time, instead of amping it up and doing what ewas necessary to win a couple more NC. That would have filled the insecure void of the region that desperately wants sports championships to redeem it from being the backyard smoky city everyone did (and still does) view it as. WPA proves continuously that it will ravenously back winners of major league sports (and FBS college football certainly qualifies as such). We should have gone the short extra mile with basketball at that time too... we were clearly cheating with Calipari, just not quite enough. Having both a big winner in the football AND basketball... mother lode in yinzer town!

The trick is to not only win but then stay near the top each year. However, that's actually easier to do in college sports ONCE you are a winner, because the system is designed to totally reward winners and keep the boot on the neck of the losers. And Pitt had indeed accomplished the hard part already, getting to 11-12 win status for a number of years. Just needed to keep it going, like Miami did in the 80s.

Anyway, the principle is entirely sound in WPA, and Pitt admin squandered a great opp. Too late now to get back. It's actually why Pitt probably should have folded football in 1996. The program today serves the purpose of bringing in ACC money for other sports, but little else. Hell the only reason to even visit these messages boards now is for the OT stuff.
 
Not ridiculous, at least in the 80s. We had a juicy window when the Steelers fell back somewhat, were losing some games 51-0 and such and using guys like Rich Erenberg and Loopy Sanchez as starters. Pitt stupidly chose to cut off the booster spigot at the same time, instead of amping it up and doing what ewas necessary to win a couple more NC. That would have filled the insecure void of the region that desperately wants sports championships to redeem it from being the backyard smoky city everyone did (and still does) view it as. The trick is to not only win but then stay near the top each year. However, that's actually easier to do in college sports ONCE you are a winner, because the system is designed to totally reward winners and keep the boot on the neck of the losers. And Pitt had indeed accomplished the hard part already, getting to 11-12 win status for a number of years. Just needed to keep it going, like Miami did in the 80s.

Anyway, the principle is entirely sound in WPA, and Pitt admin squandered a great opp. Too late now to get back. It's actually why Pitt probably should have folded football in 1996. The program today serves the purpose of bringing in ACC money for other sports, but little else. Hell the only reason to even visit these messages boards now is for the OT stuff.
The push by our administration to de prioritize football over academics in mid 80s couldn’t have come at a worse time.

It’s been said a million tunes on this board. Pitt has been its worst enemy time and again.
 
Not ridiculous, at least in the 80s. We had a juicy window when the Steelers fell back somewhat, were losing some games 51-0 and such and using guys like Rich Erenberg and Loopy Sanchez as starters. Pitt stupidly chose to cut off the booster spigot at the same time, instead of amping it up and doing what ewas necessary to win a couple more NC. That would have filled the insecure void of the region that desperately wants sports championships to redeem it from being the backyard smoky city everyone did (and still does) view it as. WPA proves continuously that it will ravenously back winners of major league sports (and FBS college football certainly qualifies as such). We should have gone the short extra mile with basketball at that time too... we were clearly cheating with Calipari, just not quite enough. Having both a big winner in the football AND basketball... mother lode in yinzer town!

The trick is to not only win but then stay near the top each year. However, that's actually easier to do in college sports ONCE you are a winner, because the system is designed to totally reward winners and keep the boot on the neck of the losers. And Pitt had indeed accomplished the hard part already, getting to 11-12 win status for a number of years. Just needed to keep it going, like Miami did in the 80s.

Anyway, the principle is entirely sound in WPA, and Pitt admin squandered a great opp. Too late now to get back. It's actually why Pitt probably should have folded football in 1996. The program today serves the purpose of bringing in ACC money for other sports, but little else. Hell the only reason to even visit these messages boards now is for the OT stuff.
Oh no doubt. I have often said this. Timing is everything. And no matter how great 76-82 were for Pitt, the Steelers were in their run of Super Bowls and the Pirates were a WS contender and champion. So Pitt's success got overshadowed locally.

Then, the Pirates and Steelers go into mediocrity, and Pitt football goes absolutely dark. If what happened at Pitt 1976-1982 happened 10 years later, I think it would have had a more lasting effect on Pitt football and local sports hierarchy in general. There are two other fringe local college football schools during that time that did well...PSU and WVU. And Pitt has been basically chasing them ever since.
 
Right because we have 3 major pro teams. The more pro teams you take away, the more people get interested in Pitt/ACC. Theoretically, if all 3 major pro teams left, Pitt football and basketball would sell out every game easily
If you really mean or believe any of this, you're an idiot. If you're just trying to stir the pot, it's a really lame effort.
 
If you really mean or believe any of this, you're an idiot. If you're just trying to stir the pot, it's a really lame effort.
It's just a fantasy, a crazy dream scenario. Sound conclusion, though. Our teams would have to win ... losing teams would still be scorned as they are today ... but otherwise his scenario is entirely correct.
 
Oh no doubt. I have often said this. Timing is everything. And no matter how great 76-82 were for Pitt, the Steelers were in their run of Super Bowls and the Pirates were a WS contender and champion. So Pitt's success got overshadowed locally.

Then, the Pirates and Steelers go into mediocrity, and Pitt football goes absolutely dark. If what happened at Pitt 1976-1982 happened 10 years later, I think it would have had a more lasting effect on Pitt football and local sports hierarchy in general. There are two other fringe local college football schools during that time that did well...PSU and WVU. And Pitt has been basically chasing them ever since.
i think the mid 80s was an important time for the evolution of college football. maybe it was cable tv starting to come into it's own, espn type coverage where it was such a bad time to dive into oblivion..

I think if we hit our peak a decade later than we did in '76 - '82, we could have used that to carry us into the next millenium. basically, being successful in mid - late 80's would have been parlayed into much longer success than in the '70s.

just a theory and all water under the bridge now..
 
Your 7 year old can be out past 5 pm there mrs soccer mom.

With over protective parenting like this, we wonder why our kids are growing up as helpless adults. SMH.

Cut the chord soufie
To each his own. I have friends who do gamedays with their families like Souf, I have buddies who like to tailgate and party hard with like minded people, and I have friends who are in between--there more for the tailgating than the game, but keep it under control. I alternate among all 3 of those categories depending on who I'm going to a game with or what game/weekend it is (like homecoming). Some are with my family, some are with a big group of guys. There's no right or wrong way to do it, it's different strokes for different folks. IMO, noon games kill the tailgating, which for many is the best part of the day. A 1:30 start seems to satisfy all categories.
 
i think the mid 80s was an important time for the evolution of college football. maybe it was cable tv starting to come into it's own, espn type coverage where it was such a bad time to dive into oblivion..

I think if we hit our peak a decade later than we did in '76 - '82, we could have used that to carry us into the next millenium. basically, being successful in mid - late 80's would have been parlayed into much longer success than in the '70s.

just a theory and all water under the bridge now..
No, you are absolutely correct. It is why the Big East basketball became such a power, because most of its footprint was wired for cable while the rest of the country wasn't, and the Big East was broadcast nationally.

It is why the U became the U. We coulda been a contender. We blew it. Never going to get that opportunity back.
 
To each his own. I have friends who do gamedays with their families like Souf, I have buddies who like to tailgate and party hard with like minded people, and I have friends who are in between--there more for the tailgating than the game, but keep it under control. I alternate among all 3 of those categories depending on who I'm going to a game with or what game/weekend it is (like homecoming). Some are with my family, some are with a big group of guys. There's no right or wrong way to do it, it's different strokes for different folks. IMO, noon games kill the tailgating, which for many is the best part of the day. A 1:30 start seems to satisfy all categories.
i think pitt gets the short end of the stick with these home noon kickoff times. We seem to get a very disproportionate amount of home noon kick off times. i know it's a tv thing and we dont pick and choose this and maybe it's just rotten luck every year.

I just see worse programs getting much better time slots continuously year in and year out and i think noon kickoffs dont help our attendance.
 
Yes but like I’ve said, we have an incredibly horrible luck with bein the recipient of home noon kick off times. Bad luck, luck of the draw is one thing but it’s worse then that. We’ve had more home noon or 1 pm home kickoffs than any other P5 team in the last 5 years, by far.

At some point, saying “it is what it is” just isn’t enough. People blame us for being avg and mediocre teams get bad tv slots but I’ve pointed out time and again, much worse programs getting much better tv slots.
So.....let's review a couple of things. Not many P5 teams to televise to an EAST Coast market, particularly Northeast.. The ACC and Big10 each have 3 "eastern teams". Those 6 play lots of games outside the region, due to conference affiliations. It's pretty dumb to expect IU, Wisky, Tenn, MO, Ark, etc. to start at 11:00 AM to fill the noon slots. The Big10 is clearly midwest, and only psu claims relevance of their 3. The networks want reasonably attractive games. Temple vs. UMASS doesn't matter. Pitt vs. Rhode Island doesn't matter, either, but at least Pitt has a tradition, and frequently punches above it's weight. I don't like noon games, either, but TV rules.
 
No, you are absolutely correct. It is why the Big East basketball became such a power, because most of its footprint was wired for cable while the rest of the country wasn't, and the Big East was broadcast nationally.

It is why the U became the U. We coulda been a contender. We blew it. Never going to get that opportunity back.
The U became the U by going pro in FB, with no regard for decency.
 
I don't care what city you move the Pirates to, if you have 23 losing seasons out of 26 and no Division Titles let alone WS titles in that same time frame, and don't financially give your team a chance to win, attendance will be abysmal.

Honestly, its amazing the buccos get the attendance they get and when the 3 years they were winning Nutting rewarded the record attendance with dismantling and not adding to a legit WS roster and team. That he caught lightening in a bottle with because the ownership sure as heck didn't try to build those Cutch lead teams.
The best ballpark ...or at least close...is the biggest reason anyone shows up. Nice way to spend an evening. you can record Jeopardy.
 
To each his own. I have friends who do gamedays with their families like Souf, I have buddies who like to tailgate and party hard with like minded people, and I have friends who are in between--there more for the tailgating than the game, but keep it under control. I alternate among all 3 of those categories depending on who I'm going to a game with or what game/weekend it is (like homecoming). Some are with my family, some are with a big group of guys. There's no right or wrong way to do it, it's different strokes for different folks. IMO, noon games kill the tailgating, which for many is the best part of the day. A 1:30 start seems to satisfy all categories.
Other than occasional random conflicts that can happen on any game day or time, I really have no gripe with any start time. There are pros and cons for all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeldas Open Roof
Side note -
Had to retrieve him for dinner at 7 since I told him to go outside around noon today .
From what I've seen of your posts over the years, I tend share much of your general worldview.

But even though I agree with you philosophically on things like this, and I think its admirable that your kid isn't locked in the basement frying his brain and wasting his body playing Fortnite, you could really stand to dial the sanctimony back. For the common good.

You don't want to come across as Buffy's more enlightened, liberal counterpart. At least I hope you don't.
 
Other than occasional random conflicts that can happen on any game day or time, I really have no gripe with any start time. There are pros and cons for all.
the older I get, the less annoyed by earlier times I get. im still not in the "matlock" or "Murder she wrote" demographic yet so I prefer the 3:30pm time..

Who knows, in another 10-20 years, I may join the rest of you guys and i'll prioritize the ability to get home back to my couch in under an hour from the stadium and come to love noon games cause I can be home in plenty of time for the early bird special at eat n park..

I may even give out a "down in front" scream to those pesky teenagers standing up on 3rd downs..
 
i think pitt gets the short end of the stick with these home noon kickoff times. We seem to get a very disproportionate amount of home noon kick off times. i know it's a tv thing and we dont pick and choose this and maybe it's just rotten luck every year.

I just see worse programs getting much better time slots continuously year in and year out and i think noon kickoffs dont help our attendance.

It's not an ACC conspiracy against us. The difference between Pitt noon games vs other like programs are the 2 games per year the Pirates make us play at noon. If you turned those 2 games into 3:30 or later, Pitt would have the same number of noon games.

For example, Pitt plays Ohio and UCF when the Pirates are home. Both will start at noon. If not for the Pirates, the Ohio game could have been a 3:30 ACCN regional broadcast and the UCF could have been like 3:30 or 7:00 or ACCN or ESPNU. Instead, that's 2 guaranteed nooners.

Pitt could be 3-1 going into the game vs say #18 UCF. It could have been a 7PM ACCN game with a tiny amount of buzz. Maybe you get a small walkup crowd and the crowd is into the game. Instead, it'll be at noon and Heinz will be a morgue.
 
If Pitt draws 34,127 to a noon game, how many would it draw if the game started at 3:30?

A. 34,127
B. 34,129
C. 34.124
D. 72,587
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT