Not ridiculous, at least in the 80s. We had a juicy window when the Steelers fell back somewhat, were losing some games 51-0 and such and using guys like Rich Erenberg and Loopy Sanchez as starters. Pitt stupidly chose to cut off the booster spigot at the same time, instead of amping it up and doing what ewas necessary to win a couple more NC. That would have filled the insecure void of the region that desperately wants sports championships to redeem it from being the backyard smoky city everyone did (and still does) view it as. WPA proves continuously that it will ravenously back winners of major league sports (and FBS college football certainly qualifies as such). We should have gone the short extra mile with basketball at that time too... we were clearly cheating with Calipari, just not quite enough. Having both a big winner in the football AND basketball... mother lode in yinzer town!
The trick is to not only win but then stay near the top each year. However, that's actually easier to do in college sports ONCE you are a winner, because the system is designed to totally reward winners and keep the boot on the neck of the losers. And Pitt had indeed accomplished the hard part already, getting to 11-12 win status for a number of years. Just needed to keep it going, like Miami did in the 80s.
Anyway, the principle is entirely sound in WPA, and Pitt admin squandered a great opp. Too late now to get back. It's actually why Pitt probably should have folded football in 1996. The program today serves the purpose of bringing in ACC money for other sports, but little else. Hell the only reason to even visit these messages boards now is for the OT stuff.