ADVERTISEMENT

Pattis performance today

Patti had a gutsy performance today and made the big-time plays when Pitt needed them, but let's not go overboard. Under 50% completion percentage and 5.5 YPA with just one TD and a terrible pick six. Anyway, he was fantastic on the game-winning drive and you have to feel good for him going out with a win like that.
 
I don’t know what the arm question is. He threw some tight passes in the middle, some nice outs. Moved in the pocket. Couple of deep balls, 1 which should have been caught to seal the game. I read the arm strength questions a lot on here. Maybe I haven’t seen him play enough, but from what I saw today, he looked better than Slovis who is dubbed some sort of passing savant. Lot of variables to consider I suppose. I think Patti was a better fit for this offense all along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittbb80
Give me a break. I’m thrilled they won but taking this performance from Patti and extrapolating it out to a 10-2 season if he plays all year is absurd

Yeah he has a lot of qualities that you want in a QB. But an accurate and/or strong am aren’t two of them. He managed a great and gutsy game but I don’t think he is a starter for a good P5 program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarshallGoldberg
Posted earlier… I thought Patti should have been lifted after banging his head and certainly after the horrible pick 6; he seemed not to be all there. I stand by that thinking at that time in the game. But, scoreboard. He won. He some really nice plays overall, especially at the end, that was a nearly impossible situation and he pulled off getting us into Fg position. Tough and gritty with that huge run. He richly deserves the win. He’s not starter material week in and out, but he was good enough today.

It’s just too bad we didn’t lift Slovis for him Vs GT, Lou and UNC; we might have won some or even all of those. Then, just think where we would have been.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChooChoo Panther
Showed Duzz and Cigs made the wrong pick. Patti was an alpha today while slovis always had the beta male aura.

Nicks only problem is he seems injury prone but the kid showed a ton of heart today

Would love to see him come back
We clearly promised Slovis he’d start and never get benched, never, ever, if healthy. He played some of the worst quarterback ever seen in the GT, Louisville and UNC games and it was outright dereliction of duty to not have yanked him in those games. Especially the GT game. Forget Patti or Yarnell. The geeky Ivy kid, or Wayne playing QB … even full Wildcat … would have been better than Slovis in the GT game. Whether Cig or Duz, some of the worst coaching decisions ever…unless they had a deal with Slovis.

Patti almost certainly would have won that GT game, because just about any college, heck, high school QB in existence would have won it. That’s not hyperbole; GT was that easily beatable in that game. Such ironclad promises to portal QBs must be what programs like ours have to do in order to get a blue blood guy, even a plodding statue like Slovis who clearly seemed a bad fit, to agree to transfer to us. I wonder what they had to promise Jurk…
 
Yeah he has a lot of qualities that you want in a QB. But an accurate and/or strong am aren’t two of them. He managed a great and gutsy game but I don’t think he is a starter for a good P5 program.
That’s not the question. The question is who would have given pitt a better chance at more wins. The beta statue or Patti.

Pitt doesn’t win this game with the beta statue And I doubt they lose to Georgia tech with Patti at the very least
 
I’m not sure it translates into being a better QB longer term - too short of a sample. But man he had big balls today.

Whatever “it” is, I think he has it, and Slovis doesn’t. Wish you could put that with Slovis’s arm talent
 
Remember the people who kept saying Slovis is the best QB on the team and it was useless to put in either of our backups, despite Patti and Yarnell looking solid when they played?

Well this is for those clowns. You were wrong. Your dismissive attitude was exposed at the sun bowl. Slovis would have folded like a tent. Patti played with heart and ran for first downs. Yarnell looked good when he played, too when called into action earlier this season.
 
Last edited:
Patti had a gutsy performance today and made the big-time plays when Pitt needed them, but let's not go overboard. Under 50% completion percentage and 5.5 YPA with just one TD and a terrible pick six. Anyway, he was fantastic on the game-winning drive and you have to feel good for him going out with a win like that.
The pick six was a fluke. Wayne perfectly blocked the db who was completely out of the play, and the ball sailed when Patti tried to adjust to the defender crashing in on him.

DB looked like a hero, but just was stupid lucky.

It wasn't like Slovis just tossing balls up like he did when flustered.
 
That’s not the question. The question is who would have given pitt a better chance at more wins. The beta statue or Patti.

Pitt doesn’t win this game with the beta statue And I doubt they lose to Georgia tech with Patti at the very least
This is from Noah Hiles in today's P-G:

"Patti and Slovis battled for the starting spot in camp. Slovis won the job and perhaps rightfully so. But what Patti showed Friday afternoon against UCLA was exactly what Pitt was missing in its losses against Georgia Tech, Louisville and North Carolina."
 
Patti had a gutsy performance today and made the big-time plays when Pitt needed them, but let's not go overboard. Under 50% completion percentage and 5.5 YPA with just one TD and a terrible pick six. Anyway, he was fantastic on the game-winning drive and you have to feel good for him going out with a win like that.
There’s no doubt Patti is not as good a passer as Sovis but it’s not like Patti is terrible. And the order of magnitude greater mobility would definitely have helped in the games we lost. An intangible that may not mean much because everyone’s demeanor is different but Patti just seems to have more of a fighter’s attitude on the field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MajorMajors
There’s no doubt Patti is not as good a passer as Sovis but it’s not like Patti is terrible. And the order of magnitude greater mobility would definitely have helped in the games we lost. An intangible that may not mean much because everyone’s demeanor is different but Patti just seems to have more of a fighter’s attitude on the field.
His mobility would’ve helped and he has a bit of that gamer in him, but I’m not going to look back on the season and think Pitt was an 11-2 team with Patti under center. He was also hurt for who knows how long during that bad stretch of games. I’m glad he finished out the season with a memorable win.
 
His mobility would’ve helped and he has a bit of that gamer in him, but I’m not going to look back on the season and think Pitt was an 11-2 team with Patti under center. He was also hurt for who knows how long during that bad stretch of games. I’m glad he finished out the season with a memorable win.
I’m maybe looking back just a little and thinking what could have been. But more so, with Nick having been here 5 years, I just wished he would have gotten more of an opportunity during the season, particularly that bad stretch. Only uncertainty is whether he didn’t because of injury status.
 
I’m just enjoying this performance.

I don’t know if he was the better option this year.

He completed less than 50% of his passes and had a bad pick 6. When you increase the sample, that likely becomes a problem as far as sustaining offense.

I think we can safely enjoy this, but not feel too bad about the season being much different if he were in there.
 
There’s no doubt Patti is not as good a passer as Sovis but it’s not like Patti is terrible. And the order of magnitude greater mobility would definitely have helped in the games we lost. An intangible that may not mean much because everyone’s demeanor is different but Patti just seems to have more of a fighter’s attitude on the field.
But Patti is a better"player." An arm in isolation means little. Patti is the better QB and athlete
 
I’m just enjoying this performance.

I don’t know if he was the better option this year.

He completed less than 50% of his passes and had a bad pick 6. When you increase the sample, that likely becomes a problem as far as sustaining offense.

I think we can safely enjoy this, but not feel too bad about the season being much different if he were in there.
Not saying he was the better overall answer either. He probably wasn’t. But he should have been brought in during the GT game for sure (which was lost solely due to terrible QB play) and likely the Louisville and UNC games. Do we win all or any? Don’t know. But we sure as heck know we lost them with Slovis playing every second in them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Millerton24
The pick six was a fluke. Wayne perfectly blocked the db who was completely out of the play, and the ball sailed when Patti tried to adjust to the defender crashing in on him.

DB looked like a hero, but just was stupid lucky.

It wasn't like Slovis just tossing balls up like he did when flustered.

Can’t say it wasn’t his fault. Tossing the ball up is exactly what he did there too.

It was a swing pass and he flung it because of the pressure. Wayne also didn’t hold the block which is why the DB caught it as opposed to being engaged in that block.

My point again is that I don’t think you can look at this full body of work in that game and say it was a great QB performance.

You CAN say that it was a great backup QB performance, with a legendary drive at the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainMurphy
Can’t say it wasn’t his fault. Tossing the ball up is exactly what he did there too.

It was a swing pass and he flung it because of the pressure. Wayne also missed the block which is why the DB caught it as opposed to being engaged in that block.

My point again is that I don’t think you can look at this full body of work in that game and say it was a great QB performance.

You CAN say that it was a great backup QB performance, with a legendary drive at the end.
I have watched the play countless times.

No, Wayne did not "miss his block," he blocked him perfectly by walling him against the sideline, the DB was completely out of the play, which is why he was in position to have the ball come to him.

Patti did NOT "flung" it, and honestly, at worst it just sailed a bit on him and I am not convinced the defender that was crashing did not tip it.



No one is saying it was a GREAT QB performance, but it absolutely was a darn fine one, even before the final drive. Dude has 73 yards rushing, moved around to make plays, and made the big plays when they were most needed.
 
But Patti is a better"player." An arm in isolation means little. Patti is the better QB and athlete
I don’t disagree with you, I was just being objective and admitting that he wasn’t as good a passer as Slovis. But it’s not like Slovis was great or that Patti was bad. I like the other things Patti brought to the table, at least to have gotten him more if an opportunity during the course of the season.

Again, I don’t know how much injury/health entered into that lack of opportunity given to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dan1911
Patti was gritty as hell, but I still don't think he has the arm talent to do that week in and week out. He's more akin to like a Schrader or someone. Let's not forget we started with the ball deep in UCLA's territory multiple times and their defense sucks.
This is exactly true. Now, is he better than Slovis? I think he has more grit, and probably more brave. But you certainly can’t say Slovis isn’t a better pure passer, he definitely is.
As many said though, with his brave grit, he gets hurt, ALOT! Even if he started he woulda played a game tops.

It’s a silly debate, Patti was like 14-30 for 113 yards at one point. He had a Herculean effort and great passes at crunch time. He deserves praise and accolades and will go down in Pitt lure.
 
Am I imagining things or did Cignetti's offense look way better with Patti running it? It didn't look as stale/stagnant.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT