Pitt's OOC schedule strength is better than both NCSU's and Clemson's.We scheduled some OC games accordingly.
Can we not assume, in light of our record against the middle of the ACC, that we probably would have won any games against more highly regarded OC opponents (Within reason)?
5 of 11 games were Q1/Q2 - Pitt went 1-4 - only one was at homeWe scheduled some OC games accordingly.
Can we not assume, in light of our record against the middle of the ACC, that we probably would have won any games against more highly regarded OC opponents (Within reason)?
It is hard to know those projections, though.We just need to avoid scheduling any non conference opponents projected to be 250 or lower.
Watching the SEC title game, and they are using Vandy beating Pitt as a case for why Vandy should be in ahead of Pitt.I think the stretch after the VCU loss allowed them to regroup and find what worked. Really wish we had both the VCU and Vandy games back.
I am sure they are arguing that Pitt should be in ahead of Northwestern then.Watching the SEC title game, and they are using Vandy beating Pitt as a case for why Vandy should be in ahead of Pitt.
Pitt use to schedule to take advantage of the RPI, so I'd argue they scheduled well.We always scheduled poorly when we were dominating the Big East.
Most of the transfers are pretty much set by the end of May. The nonconference schedule comes out in July.It is hard to know those projections, though.
Especially with the transfer portal.
This Pitt team over achieved. The team (talent) is not as good as our record.We just need to avoid scheduling any non conference opponents projected to be 250 or lower.
Depends on your definition of poor. We scheduled more cupcakes, but seemed to know what cupcakes to schedule that were a)guaranteed wins and 2) not RPI killers.We always scheduled poorly when we were dominating the Big East.
Yeah, that’s a good point.Pitt use to schedule to take advantage of the RPI, so I'd argue they scheduled well.