I thought it would have improved for certain players after a year of experience.
I thought wrong. Announcer said this is sloppy and he is correct
I thought wrong. Announcer said this is sloppy and he is correct
It definitely hasn’t looked good at times. I’m optimistically attributing that to good defense by both Pitt and FSU. If that’s not the case then yeah, the we need some work on the offense, decision-making, etc.I thought it would have improved for certain players after a year of experience.
I thought wrong. Announcer said this is sloppy and he is correct
I thought it would have improved for certain players after a year of experience.
I thought wrong. Announcer said this is sloppy and he is correct
You also need to get play unselfishly, dribble less and with a purpose and pass more.
Pitt did more of that in the second half and hopefully the first half was just a brief reminder of what happened last season
FSU is tall and athletic so if it looked sloppy at times, that may explain it!
Yea exactly. Point being is one might wanna hold off on judgements and making broad statements after about 10 minutes of basketball.
If they are tall and you are short driving down the lane and trying to shoot over them makes zero sense
Did you see the foul problems FSU had? 3 guys fouled out. Sloppy but effective!
This is how Pitt played all of last season especially McGowens and Toney. Definitely wasn’t a rush to judgement
I am happy Pitt won. That strategy won’t work against good teams. Ball movement setting screens driving and dishing are what Pitt should be doing the rest of the season
as comparison the only bad shot Murphy took was at the end of the shot clock when he had to shoot. Playing fundamentally sound basketball isn’t difficult but it must be a focus of the head coach
Yea ok. Judge 2 true sophomores in game 1 after 10 minutes. No rush to judgment. Sorry what was I thinking.
And they’re playing with a bunch of new guys. It’ll take a few more games. You may turn out to be correct but there’s no way to know right now.
I’m sure those guys realize this team will go as they go in a majority of the games. I thought X was forcing things too. But the start of this season has been a cluster F for a lot of teams. As someone mentioned last night Kansas had 30 turnovers.
If they are tall and you are short driving down the lane and trying to shoot over them makes zero sense
And extremely physical. I think the refs did a great job being consistent throughout. What a difference between football and basketball referees. It’s refreshing.FSU is tall and athletic so if it looked sloppy at times, that may explain it!
TV Teddy still going strong.And extremely physical. I think the refs did a great job being consistent throughout. What a difference between football and basketball referees. It’s refreshing.
And extremely physical. I think the refs did a great job being consistent throughout. What a difference between football and basketball referees. It’s refreshing.
At this point what you see from McGowens and Johnson is what they will be. Playing unselfish, in addition to it being smart basketball, is also a reflection of your personality. Obviously they put their own personal aspirations above that of the team. Which isn’t a shock I see it often today in both basketball and football. One reason basketball is becoming hard for me to watch.
But anyway using the “they are young” excuse isn’t going to fly anymore
So you’re telling me that a player in his 35th game of college level basketball will be the same player that he is in his 100th? I’m not buying that for a moment
So you’re telling me that a player in his 35th game of college level basketball will be the same player that he is in his 100th? I’m not buying that for a moment
as far as wanting to pass the ball/understanding that being unselfish is more likely to help their team win? Hell yes they will be the same, unless a good coach steps in and ends it
The last piece of what you said is exactly what college is all about. Playing under a good coach that can develop you into a quality basketball player.
If you don’t think Capel is that coach, then so be it. But in typical Pitt fashion, everyone loses their shit over 1 game and extrapolates it for the next 30.
Agreed - it must be rectifiedthese kids were selfish last season. I though it would change going into year 2 but it is getting worse
The last piece of what you said is exactly what college is all about. Playing under a good coach that can develop you into a quality basketball player.
If you don’t think Capel is that coach, then so be it. But in typical Pitt fashion, everyone loses their shit over 1 game and extrapolates it for the next 30.
these kids were selfish last season. I though it would change going into year 2 but it is getting worse
Ok that’s fine. Not disagreeing. But Again, you’re assuming no development will happen in the next 3 years (given how they’re playing, they’ll be 4 year players). So you’re basically saying Capel and staff aren’t good coaches.
A lot of why players improve with time is the increase in playing time and the game slowing down for them that goes with that game experience.So you’re telling me that a player in his 35th game of college level basketball will be the same player that he is in his 100th? I’m not buying that for a moment
A lot of why players improve with time is the increase in playing time and the game slowing down for them that goes with that game experience.So you’re telling me that a player in his 35th game of college level basketball will be the same player that he is in his 100th? I’m not buying that for a moment
However, with X and McGowens, we’re not talking about guys that only played 10 minutes or so a game as freshman, little more as sophomores and so on. These guys averaged close to or more than 30 minutes a game as freshman. They’re already fairly seasoned. Any improvement they have with time isn’t going to be as significant as for other freshmen that had nowhere near as much game experience.
Again, we’re still talking about kids not getting any better after their freshman year and onward based on a 2 game sample size of mediocre to poor play. A week ago before the season many were saying X was gone after this year.
I’m just illustrating how asinine people on this board are. How hyper reactive people are based on tiny sample sizes. I would bump this later in the year when they start putting up huge numbers but I cancelled my subscription after this month.
I’ll agree with you there, 2 games into the season isn’t time to make grand conclusions. My comment was more towards the many that have assumed there will be this automatic and significant improvement in our 3 freshmen from last year because they’ll be a year further along. When they played close to 30 minutes a game last year, their improvement won’t be as much as for a typical freshman that got nowhere near as much game experience last year.Again, we’re still talking about kids not getting any better after their freshman year and onward based on a 2 game sample size of mediocre to poor play. A week ago before the season many were saying X was gone after this year.
I’m just illustrating how asinine people on this board are. How hyper reactive people are based on tiny sample sizes. I would bump this later in the year when they start putting up huge numbers but I cancelled my subscription after this month.
I would bump this later in the year when they start putting up huge numbers but I cancelled my subscription after this month.
A lot of improvement comes in practice playing against upperclassmen who are better than you because they’ve spent 2-4 yrs playing against guys who were better than them . Pitt has missed this cycle because there aren’t any upperclassmen in the program to learn from so the freshman last season being the best players on your team really wasn’t the ideal situation for them to learn the college game . While the three are all very good players they weren’t the elite one and done talent that should earn an immediate starting assignment. They needed to be worked into the lineup and not have their weaknesses so exposed . The only thing that worries me is that all three have shown no growth or maturity to their games so far this season , but then again they’ve only played two games . Until freshman like JC and GD come in and see limited PT their first yr at Pitt the team will not really be a competitor to the top ACC teams . Freshman like Steven Adams and Blair are another story . Sam Young who was a better player than either X or Trey appear to be worked his way onto the court only becoming a full time starter his jr yr .A lot of why players improve with time is the increase in playing time and the game slowing down for them that goes with that game experience.
However, with X and McGowens, we’re not talking about guys that only played 10 minutes or so a game as freshman, little more as sophomores and so on. These guys averaged close to or more than 30 minutes a game as freshman. They’re already fairly seasoned. Any improvement they have with time isn’t going to be as significant as for other freshmen that had nowhere near as much game experience.