After the WF debacle, I wasn't sure what we'd see today against
a ranked Syracuse team. Well, for 3 Qtr's we were clearly the better
team IMO. Our D was good keeping them in check and offensively
we looked much improved from the WF game. The A/TO ratio wasn't
the usual killer today as we were an improved 14/16. Now here's a first;
Syracuse was much worse...7/13. That had something to do with their
not so hot performance. They didn't look like a ranked team, and giving
credit to our players, we had something to do with it.
The stats that killed us.....Cuse shot 21 FT's and made 18, we only went to the
line 12 times and made 10. Excellent shooting by both teams....but 21 attempts
to our 12? 3 pt shooting, both teams were off, but they made 7 to our 3. We
were 17% on our threes. FT's and 3 pt shooting were major factors determining
the point difffential in this game.
Marley W, 0 pts today, and only 2 Assists with 4 TO's. She only attempted 3 shots
but considering her shooting ability, she shouldn't take many more. Lets see,
Malcolm our designated shooter...1-8 FG's, Threes, 0-6. Yeah I know, I know, it's
Verdi's fault and his poorly designed sets. Well, just ignore those stats and write
it off as yesterday's poster telling me that I'm mean and not caring for these girls.
She was better in the A/TO category with a 2/1 ratio. King had another monster
game with 29 pt's. They weren't gimmies either as she's being closely guarded
and double teamed. Perkins hit all 3 of our threes. Battle is showing she has some
game. I'd like to see her be more assertive and shoot more (3-6 FG's).
If this were a 3 QTR game we woulda won it. We looked good during that time.
The fourth Qtr? Well, if you watched it you saw it. Syracuse woke up and
scored 22 pts. Our 4 pts in that same QTR? I'll let someone else on here
explain it.
a ranked Syracuse team. Well, for 3 Qtr's we were clearly the better
team IMO. Our D was good keeping them in check and offensively
we looked much improved from the WF game. The A/TO ratio wasn't
the usual killer today as we were an improved 14/16. Now here's a first;
Syracuse was much worse...7/13. That had something to do with their
not so hot performance. They didn't look like a ranked team, and giving
credit to our players, we had something to do with it.
The stats that killed us.....Cuse shot 21 FT's and made 18, we only went to the
line 12 times and made 10. Excellent shooting by both teams....but 21 attempts
to our 12? 3 pt shooting, both teams were off, but they made 7 to our 3. We
were 17% on our threes. FT's and 3 pt shooting were major factors determining
the point difffential in this game.
Marley W, 0 pts today, and only 2 Assists with 4 TO's. She only attempted 3 shots
but considering her shooting ability, she shouldn't take many more. Lets see,
Malcolm our designated shooter...1-8 FG's, Threes, 0-6. Yeah I know, I know, it's
Verdi's fault and his poorly designed sets. Well, just ignore those stats and write
it off as yesterday's poster telling me that I'm mean and not caring for these girls.
She was better in the A/TO category with a 2/1 ratio. King had another monster
game with 29 pt's. They weren't gimmies either as she's being closely guarded
and double teamed. Perkins hit all 3 of our threes. Battle is showing she has some
game. I'd like to see her be more assertive and shoot more (3-6 FG's).
If this were a 3 QTR game we woulda won it. We looked good during that time.
The fourth Qtr? Well, if you watched it you saw it. Syracuse woke up and
scored 22 pts. Our 4 pts in that same QTR? I'll let someone else on here
explain it.
Last edited: