Pitt Day of Giving
pittdayofgiving.com
Corresponds with Pitt's 237th birthday tomorrow.
I jumped the gun and donated yesterday. Didn't even realize that today was a special day.Pitt Day of Giving
pittdayofgiving.com
Corresponds with Pitt's 237th birthday tomorrow.
I got a phone call today from a young man at Pitt. He asked me to donate. I told him I donated $100 last week because the president waved 1.2 billion in tuition loan relief. I told him as a tax payer I am probably on the hook for $100 because the tax payers are going to have to come up with 1.2 billion.
I can’t wait for people on this board to shove it up my ass for the above comments. That’s just the way I feel. My wife and I worked our asses off to pay for 3 children’s higher education. 2 went to Pitt and 1 went to a Big 10 school.
If I took my wife to Maui for 10 days and dropped $15,000 with Marriott and Delta, would I give them $100 the next year as a donation because my vacation was such a great experience I want to help defray the cost for some other vacation goers. Maybe not the same comparison but then again. I’m a proud Pitt grad but I’m just not donating money.
Let’s discuss.
The actual cost to taxpayers was zero. May actually be a net positive if it spurs spending.I got a phone call today from a young man at Pitt. He asked me to donate. I told him I donated $100 last week because the president waved 1.2 billion in tuition loan relief. I told him as a tax payer I am probably on the hook for $100 because the tax payers are going to have to come up with 1.2 billion.
I got a phone call today from a young man at Pitt. He asked me to donate. I told him I donated $100 last week because the president waved 1.2 billion in tuition loan relief. I told him as a tax payer I am probably on the hook for $100 because the tax payers are going to have to come up with 1.2 billion.
I can’t wait for people on this board to shove it up my ass for the above comments. That’s just the way I feel. My wife and I worked our asses off to pay for 3 children’s higher education. 2 went to Pitt and 1 went to a Big 10 school.
If I took my wife to Maui for 10 days and dropped $15,000 with Marriott and Delta, would I give them $100 the next year as a donation because my vacation was such a great experience I want to help defray the cost for some other vacation goers. Maybe not the same comparison but then again. I’m a proud Pitt grad but I’m just not donating money.
Let’s discuss.
Honest question here because I don't know how this works.Or someone that doesn't want to be left or right, one can donate to Pitt's Habitat for Humanity, or Pitt Wounded Warriors, or to cancer research, or to any number of club sports, or varsity athletics.
The money is collected by Pitt and transferred to the student organization at Pitt.Honest question here because I don't know how this works.
Is there any difference in how the money is allocated if you donate to Pitt's Habitat for Humanity, or Pitt Wounded Warriors Project chapter vs. the parent organization?
Does a percentage of that donation go to maintaining/running the local chapter, or does it all go directly to the parent organization?
Actually you got a lot of thoughtful replies. I won't comment oneI can’t wait for people on this board to shove it up my ass for the above comments.
It most definitely cost the taxpayers since it was added to the national debt.The actual cost to taxpayers was zero. May actually be a net positive if it spurs spending.
If I loan you $100 and tell you that I'll add $1 a day in interest until you pay me back. After 150 days, you've paid only the interest which would have been $150. You technically still owe me $100 but I tell you I'm good, how much did it cost me to forgive that loan?
Forgiven debt is shown on the books but it's not real money. Unrealized returns? I don't really know how a paper transaction goes towards the national debt but I guess you can make numbers look however you like.It most definitely cost the taxpayers since it was added to the national debt.
I didn't read it. I know how finances work. The repayments would have come into the govt as receipts to offset expenditures. Forgiving the repayments allows those expenditures to stand alone. Since our govt is a net debtor, allowing standalone expenditures to grow increases the national debt.Forgiven debt is shown on the books but it's not real money. Unrealized returns? I don't really know how a paper transaction goes towards the national debt but I guess you can make numbers look however you like.
Edit: I'd be happy to read whatever you saw that shows this. I would be interested in it.
Right, unrealized returns.I didn't read it. I know how finances work. The repayments would have come into the govt as receipts to offset expenditures. Forgiving the repayments allows those expenditures to stand alone. Since our govt is a net debtor, allowing standalone expenditures to grow increases the national debt.
They are most definitely unrealized when they are forgiven. Not so much when not forgiven.Right, unrealized returns.
But calling that a cost is inaccurate. It's not even a loss because of the returns that have already been realized.They are most definitely unrealized when they are forgiven. Not so much when not forgiven.
What are you talking about? You are not making any sense at all.But calling that a cost is inaccurate. It's not even a loss because of the returns that have already been realized.
Apparently but I don't think that's my fault.What are you talking about? You are not making any sense at all.