ADVERTISEMENT

Ron Cook article on the Pitt/Wake game

PittPoker

Board of Trustee
Gold Member
Feb 4, 2008
29,906
22,829
113
Pretty accurate, even for Cook




By Ron Cook / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

At 9:15 p.m. Tuesday, as the Pitt-Wake Forest game went into the second overtime, many in one of the worst Petersen Events Center crowds in years headed into the cold, dark night. It wasn’t because they were afraid of tough winter conditions on the drive home or because they had to go to school or work this morning. It was because they had seen enough bad basketball for one night. I would say the two teams set the sport back 50 years, but that would be unfairly insulting to basketball of the 1960s. You’ve heard of games when it’s a shame one team has to lose? It was a shame one had to win this one. Pitt escaped, 101-96. It wasn’t because it was good. It was because Wake Forest is so bad.

Pitt coach Jamie Dixon tried to put a positive spin on it. “This was a great win for us. We beat a good team. We battled. We competed. I’m very proud of our kids.” That might sound nice, but it’s utter nonsense. The Pitt program, so strong and so proud for so long, is a mess right now. It’s hard to believe it won the Big East championship and was a No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament just five years ago.

After this night, that seems like a lifetime ago.

Pitt didn’t just need the two overtimes, it needed a 58-35 rebounding edge and a 16-for-32 free-throw shooting performance by Wake Forest to beat a team that came into its building with 10 consecutive losses and a 1-12 record in the ACC.

I didn’t expect Dixon to say he has a lousy team or that the season is over with five ACC games left plus the conference tournament. Miracles do happen. Maybe Pitt will beat Syracuse, Virginia Tech and Georgia Tech on the road and Louisville and Duke at home to roll into the postseason. Sure, it will.

Still, I’ve never seen Dixon in denial like this.

He opened his post-game news conference by praising the crowd and the Oakland Zoo. I know what great crowds are at Petersen Events Center. I was there when Pitt beat No. 1 Connecticut in 2009.

Heck, I was there Feb. 6 when Pitt played Virginia. Those were great crowds. The one Tuesday night was not. Once, Pitt had regular, throbbing sellouts of 12,508.

Attendance this time was 8,825. The end zones of the Oakland Zoo were empty. So were many sections of the upper deck.

That’s not the fans’ fault or the students’ fault. Pitt was awful in that game against Virginia and then lost two on the road at Miami and North Carolina. It hadn’t looked like much of an NCAA tournament team all season. It was 0-5 against ranked opponents, four of the losses by double digits. It hadn’t earned better support this season.

Nothing that happened Tuesday night changed that. Boos poured down on Pitt when Jamel Artis was careless with an inbounds pass after a Wake Forest basket and Bryant Crawford immediately turned it into another Wake Forest score for a 22-15 lead. The crowd was restless again in the second half when Pitt — maybe the most defensively challenged team of the Dixon era — wasted a 56-46 lead by allowing Wake Forest to go on a 10-0 run.

But Wake Forest is so bad that it never felt as if it would win the game even though it ripped through Pitt’s lame defense to shot 50.7 percent from the field, including 41.4 percent on 3-point shots. Certainly, Wake Forest had a great chance in the first overtime when Cornelius Hudson went to the free-throw line with 25.2 seconds left with Wake Forest ahead, 82-81. Of course, he missed both foul shots. Pitt’s Ryan Luther then missed two free throws with 10.7 seconds left, giving Wake Forest another chance. It blew that one, too, when Codi Miller-McIntyre’s inbounds pass was intercepted by James Robinson, who made one free throw to send the game to a second overtime.

“I thought James was terrific,” Dixon said.

I’ll agree with that point. Chris Jones made five 3-point shots and had 23 points and Rafael Maia was a force with 12 rebounds, but Robinson was the big reason Pitt managed to avoid what might have been the worst loss in Petersen Events Center history considering the poor opponent and that Pitt was playing to keep its fading NCAA tournament hopes alive.

Robinson, who took most of the criticism during Pitt’s three-game losing streak, hit a 3-point shot to tie the score, 72-72, at the end of regulation.

He made that steal and free throw in the first overtime. He made a jump shot, set up Artis for a basket, had five defensive rebounds and made five free throws down the stretch in the second overtime. His final line: 22 points on 7-of-15 shooting with 10 rebounds, 9 assists and 0 turnovers.

Robinson saved Pitt from even more embarrassment.

But back to Dixon, who, apparently, watched a different game than I did.

“It speaks to how hard we’re playing. We know we’re not a perfect team right now. But we’re not frustrated. We’re not giving up. We’re going to get better. People might look at me like I’m crazy. We’re 25 games in. But I believe we’ll get better.”

Count me among those people.

You know, the ones who think Dixon is crazy.

Ron Cook: rcook@post-gazette.com. Ron Cook can be heard on the “Cook and Poni” show weekdays from 10 a.m.-2 p.m. on 93.7 The Fan.
 
I hate Ron Cook and I won't go to the PG website anymore nor buy their newspaper because I refuse to support that left wing rag, but he pretty much hit it on the nose with this one...
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Sisco Kid
He said, "I know why he said it, he is the coach, what's he going to say", then later, "he is in denial....and crazy". Apparently, he didn't understand the first point at all. It's the coach. Should he say they stink and have no hope? He is a battler, and is trying to coax wins out of this crew. I doubt calling the players out publicly at this point would help whatever is ailing them right now.
 
Well, just like Jamie "had to say it" cook had to write it. How many people would read an article titled "Jamie Dixon handles post game press conference perfectly". Well I guess I know a couple people who would love it. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
Maybe Dixon needs to start recruiting in Africa because he truly is the King of Denial.

When we have a bad week in our every day jobs and our boss praises us wrongly, do we respect the boss more or wonder what he's been watching lately?

Jamie has made the conscious decision that he simply won't give a true negative inch to the media. He must think the fans, media and his players are complete buffoons to believe the words coming out of his mouth after these games. If he thinks his players respect him more for patting them on the back when they play bad, he's wrong. That's his biggest flaw: He's too nice of a guy. Tough love is what the players want and need to sense. Bob Huggins comes out and blasts not only his team but specific players after poor performances. Why? Watch the game tape. And his players love to play for him.

There are no more Providences or Seton Halls or Rutgers or South Floridas to consistently beat up on and win 60-54 against.

Scott Barnes is no dummie. He sees what's going on. Half filled Petes becoming more the norm. Downward trending. Players clearly tuning out the coach for the past bunch of years. Fans becoming apathetic. No NBA level players choosing Pitt unless they live down the street. 1-2 more years of this might do it for JD.

Arizona State still need a coach?
 
Ron nearly off the Pitt bb bandwagon. I'd imagine more Huggins articles forthcoming.
 
Well, just like Jamie "had to say it" cook had to write it. How many people would read an article titled "Jamie Dixon handles post game press conference perfectly". Well I guess I know a couple people who would love it. ;)
If someone finds that kind of article riveting, more power to them. I find trying to pick apart coach speak for some deeper meaning to be a rather boring read and quite pointless, but we all have different opinions I know. Cook also wrote he understood why he said it, because Jamie is the coach, then tore him apart for saying it. Like I said, that's a little dull. I can see why some on here would love it, they post like that as well, it's on their level.
 
If someone finds that kind of article riveting, more power to them. I find trying to pick apart coach speak for some deeper meaning to be a rather boring read and quite pointless, but we all have different opinions I know.
Just lazy reporting from a lazy NTAC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jd99
I noticed that Cook uncharacteristically stayed until the end of this game. He was just hoping for a loss so he could write something even snarkier than this column. The state of Pittsburgh journalism continues its downward spiral. Not an enterprising reporter in all of Allegheny County on any beat.
 
I just have the observation that Starkey's article in the Trib yesterday and Cooke's article cited above are the first two articles written which have noted that the team's a mess. That in itself has some meaning in that fans' reactions are normally magnified once the press starts the negative band wagon rolling, if it's not already rolling.
 
He said, "I know why he said it, he is the coach, what's he going to say", then later, "he is in denial....and crazy". Apparently, he didn't understand the first point at all. It's the coach. Should he say they stink and have no hope? He is a battler, and is trying to coax wins out of this crew. I doubt calling the players out publicly at this point would help whatever is ailing them right now.
There are far less condescending and douchy ways for Cook to be critical and get the point across than this sneering article. Living in metro Detroit, I don't read the PG or the Trib, but those really do seem to be substandard big city newspapers. Someone on this board was criticizing Mitch Albom the other day, and I'm thinking, you're talking $hit about Albom when you guys are stuck with hacks like Ron Cook?
 
  • Like
Reactions: KiwiJeff
There are far less condescending and douchy ways for Cook to be critical and get the point across than this sneering article. Living in metro Detroit, I don't read the PG or the Trib, but those really do seem to be substandard big city newspapers. Someone on this board was criticizing Mitch Albom the other day, and I'm thinking, you're talking $hit about Albom when you guys are stuck with hacks like Ron Cook?
Agree but in this day and age no ones "stuck" with anyone ...internets and all that...however seeing the typical self loathing reactions in this thread one understands how it is Cook still has a job as well...
 
Agree but in this day and age no ones "stuck" with anyone ...internets and all that...however seeing the typical self loathing reactions in this thread one understands how it is Cook still has a job as well...
Of course, but you're going to read your local paper online, not someone else's, unless you're unemployed or retired and have a shit ton of time on your hands.

Since you're free to read any paper you want to online, how often do you read the Detroit Free Press, the Chicago Tribune, the Orlando Sentinel, or the LA Times?

So like I said, you live in WPA, you're pretty much stuck with Ron Cook and those two raggedy ass excuses for daily papers.
 
Blame Cook, wow, anything to make you sleep at night I guess

We're blaming Cook for being an illiterate, moronic hack of a writer. Nothing he ever writes about anything ever comes close to being close to journalism. This article is just another in a long line of drivel from an incompetent boob.

I'm also certain that Dixon is not talking this way privately to his team. They knew last night that he was not happy at all with their play and he let them know it. He says one thing to the media, knowing how they as a group take it and manipulate it to make it fit their agenda. In private, he is a taskmaster and a perfectionist. He demands perfection and performance. Those kids are going to be hurting after practice this week.
 
These same guys weren't saying shit when cook wrote an article praising Dixon in January of 15. Calling it a Pitt and Dixon a perfect fit. Some of the same guys were actually lauding the article. "Cook gets it" one poster wrote.
 
These same guys weren't saying shit when cook wrote an article praising Dixon in January of 15. Calling it a Pitt and Dixon a perfect fit. Some of the same guys were actually lauding the article. "Cook gets it" one poster wrote.
But you have to admit, that earlier article was a rarity. Not sure why anyone thinks Cook is to blame for anything??!!?? He's irrelevant to the team's problems.
 
Pretty accurate, even for Cook




By Ron Cook / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

At 9:15 p.m. Tuesday, as the Pitt-Wake Forest game went into the second overtime, many in one of the worst Petersen Events Center crowds in years headed into the cold, dark night. It wasn’t because they were afraid of tough winter conditions on the drive home or because they had to go to school or work this morning. It was because they had seen enough bad basketball for one night. I would say the two teams set the sport back 50 years, but that would be unfairly insulting to basketball of the 1960s. You’ve heard of games when it’s a shame one team has to lose? It was a shame one had to win this one. Pitt escaped, 101-96. It wasn’t because it was good. It was because Wake Forest is so bad.

Pitt coach Jamie Dixon tried to put a positive spin on it. “This was a great win for us. We beat a good team. We battled. We competed. I’m very proud of our kids.” That might sound nice, but it’s utter nonsense. The Pitt program, so strong and so proud for so long, is a mess right now. It’s hard to believe it won the Big East championship and was a No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament just five years ago.

After this night, that seems like a lifetime ago.

Pitt didn’t just need the two overtimes, it needed a 58-35 rebounding edge and a 16-for-32 free-throw shooting performance by Wake Forest to beat a team that came into its building with 10 consecutive losses and a 1-12 record in the ACC.

I didn’t expect Dixon to say he has a lousy team or that the season is over with five ACC games left plus the conference tournament. Miracles do happen. Maybe Pitt will beat Syracuse, Virginia Tech and Georgia Tech on the road and Louisville and Duke at home to roll into the postseason. Sure, it will.

Still, I’ve never seen Dixon in denial like this.

He opened his post-game news conference by praising the crowd and the Oakland Zoo. I know what great crowds are at Petersen Events Center. I was there when Pitt beat No. 1 Connecticut in 2009.

Heck, I was there Feb. 6 when Pitt played Virginia. Those were great crowds. The one Tuesday night was not. Once, Pitt had regular, throbbing sellouts of 12,508.

Attendance this time was 8,825. The end zones of the Oakland Zoo were empty. So were many sections of the upper deck.

That’s not the fans’ fault or the students’ fault. Pitt was awful in that game against Virginia and then lost two on the road at Miami and North Carolina. It hadn’t looked like much of an NCAA tournament team all season. It was 0-5 against ranked opponents, four of the losses by double digits. It hadn’t earned better support this season.

Nothing that happened Tuesday night changed that. Boos poured down on Pitt when Jamel Artis was careless with an inbounds pass after a Wake Forest basket and Bryant Crawford immediately turned it into another Wake Forest score for a 22-15 lead. The crowd was restless again in the second half when Pitt — maybe the most defensively challenged team of the Dixon era — wasted a 56-46 lead by allowing Wake Forest to go on a 10-0 run.

But Wake Forest is so bad that it never felt as if it would win the game even though it ripped through Pitt’s lame defense to shot 50.7 percent from the field, including 41.4 percent on 3-point shots. Certainly, Wake Forest had a great chance in the first overtime when Cornelius Hudson went to the free-throw line with 25.2 seconds left with Wake Forest ahead, 82-81. Of course, he missed both foul shots. Pitt’s Ryan Luther then missed two free throws with 10.7 seconds left, giving Wake Forest another chance. It blew that one, too, when Codi Miller-McIntyre’s inbounds pass was intercepted by James Robinson, who made one free throw to send the game to a second overtime.

“I thought James was terrific,” Dixon said.

I’ll agree with that point. Chris Jones made five 3-point shots and had 23 points and Rafael Maia was a force with 12 rebounds, but Robinson was the big reason Pitt managed to avoid what might have been the worst loss in Petersen Events Center history considering the poor opponent and that Pitt was playing to keep its fading NCAA tournament hopes alive.

Robinson, who took most of the criticism during Pitt’s three-game losing streak, hit a 3-point shot to tie the score, 72-72, at the end of regulation.

He made that steal and free throw in the first overtime. He made a jump shot, set up Artis for a basket, had five defensive rebounds and made five free throws down the stretch in the second overtime. His final line: 22 points on 7-of-15 shooting with 10 rebounds, 9 assists and 0 turnovers.

Robinson saved Pitt from even more embarrassment.

But back to Dixon, who, apparently, watched a different game than I did.

“It speaks to how hard we’re playing. We know we’re not a perfect team right now. But we’re not frustrated. We’re not giving up. We’re going to get better. People might look at me like I’m crazy. We’re 25 games in. But I believe we’ll get better.”

Count me among those people.

You know, the ones who think Dixon is crazy.

Ron Cook: rcook@post-gazette.com. Ron Cook can be heard on the “Cook and Poni” show weekdays from 10 a.m.-2 p.m. on 93.7 The Fan.

Accurate? Maybe. But do you actually believe Ron Cook needs to write a 3rd article on the state of the Pitt basketball program in less than 2 weeks. doesn't it seem that he has an anti Pitt agenda and just can't wait for any reason to show it. here we are in a town with 3 pro teams and this guy can't wait to slam the Panthers. Classic case of a lazy journalist kicking a man and program when it is down.

Pitt is not a good team. We get that, Ron. So give it a freakin rest already. How bout an article on the state of the Nittany Lion hoops program.
 
Just sayin, Wake was pitiful and Pitt struggled.
It was pathetic, no doubt. But, for the most part, our guys played pretty hard. Maia isn't very skilled or athletc....but the ball seems to find him. Hustle = opportunities, same as Luther.
 
But you have to admit, that earlier article was a rarity. Not sure why anyone thinks Cook is to blame for anything??!!?? He's irrelevant to the team's problems.


I don't have to admit anything. You need to look at the truth. You're crazy over this. Google Ron Cook and Jamie Dixon and you will find loads of articles praising Dixon. I thought it was crazy at first but I now am in the camp that you must be related to Dixon somehow.

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...-has-seat-among-the-best/stories/201405230048

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...-Dixon-are-a-perfect-fit/stories/201501160108

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ron-cook/2011/03/21/Don-t-give-up-on-Dixon/stories/201103210195

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...ke-about-Pitt-s-response/stories/201502150208
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
I don't have to admit anything. You need to look at the truth. You're crazy over this. Google Ron Cook and Jamie Dixon and you will find loads of articles praising Dixon. I thought it was crazy at first but I now am in the camp that you must be related to Dixon somehow.

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...-has-seat-among-the-best/stories/201405230048

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...-Dixon-are-a-perfect-fit/stories/201501160108

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ron-cook/2011/03/21/Don-t-give-up-on-Dixon/stories/201103210195

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...ke-about-Pitt-s-response/stories/201502150208
Dixon could lose all the rest of his games this season, finish in last next season and NTOP would be on here claiming we can't get anyone better and by 2021 we'd get all new players and Dixon will turn it around. It's comical.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT