In fairness, the AD at Clemson has the distinct advantage of having gobs of money at his/her disposal. Compare that to being the AD at Pitt, whose alumni - while they give handsomely to Pitt's general fund - don't give as willingly to athletics.
Barnes's #1 priority at Pitt might just have to be fund-raising. Until Pitt comes-up with the kind of money that their opponents have, they will always be one step behind - in facilities, in recruiting, and yes - in keeping successful coaches from leaving for more money elsewhere.
The number one priority for every athletic director everywhere is to fundraise.
Barnes's predecessor failed to appreciate that fact and thought he was a general manager, rather than an athletic director. He would get involved in things like what types of systems coaches were running and who was getting playing time.
That's an egregious abdication of his responsibilities.
Still, I would tolerate that arrogance if fundraising was going well. However, our fundraising wasn't doing well at all. In fact, it was an unmitigated disaster.
... and yet we just kept giving the guy raises.
Unreal.
As for the bolded portion above, to me, that is good news because it means the money is there. The Pitt athletic department now needs to figure out how to get it.
I have an idea. How about we try not pissing off the fans for a little bit but stripping them of all of their traditions?
How about we try giving them what they want for a change?
How about we spend a little extra money upfront to help these programs win so that the fans can then donate to the program to sustain that success?
People say that it's all the fans fault and that is not part of our culture to donate. That's ridiculous – absolutely ridiculous!
You have to hire people who know how to go out and get their money. There are people all over the country that specialize in that skill.
Maybe we will never be able to compete with Clemson in that regard – in fact we won't be. However, we should absolutely be competitive with the other urban schools in our league like Georgia Tech, Miami, Boston College, etc. In fact, we should probably be ahead of those schools on the donations front.
However, what do you don't see at those schools is a ban on calling the school Georgia Tech in favor of the more formal Georgia Institute of Technology. You don't see Boston College changing its colors to fire engine red and neon yellow. You don't see anyone telling Miami fans to quit calling their school "The U."
We did comparable things to all of those examples – plus we tore down their stadium – then we turned around and blamed them for not seeing our brilliance and contributing to the program.
Seriously, WTF?!