agree with almost allOriginally posted by PITTLAW:
Not sure why we like living in the past? But if you are going to live there...better get your head scratching offensive play calling straight. Much more analagous to the Tire Bowl series of play calls where Pitt had the ball first and goal, left Fitzgerald on the bench...and did not score and went on to lose. Or perhaps you remember the Insight Bowl where Kevin Barlow tore up the field in the first half...only to not see the ball in the second half...and Pitt went on to lose. Harris was the classic coach who got fancy and often out-smarted himself with his offensive play calls and use of personnel. Wannstedt and Chryst were much more power run the ball types and both would have run the ball on second and 1 yard to go--and neither had a guy as good as Lynch [although Connor may be close at least in that situation]. Hail to Pitt!
I agree 100% that's what dumba$$ Chryst would have done... gone for the FGOriginally posted by fkthomas:
Yeah. I'd have to think that's a Walt type decision there. Wanny would have run the ball. PC would have run a bootleg there and gone for a FG to tie. The angle of the FG is not as significant from the right hash in the NFL, so the FG would have been good--sending the game into OT...which would have been NEAT to experience an OT super bowl.
Posted from Rivals Mobile