ADVERTISEMENT

Should the non fumble have been

gary2

Athletic Director
Jul 21, 2001
18,986
7,799
113
Grounding?

Also - I say a clear hook/hold on a Criswell scramble pass that set up a 4th and one.
 
I thought you had to have CLEAR evidence to overturn a call. That wasn’t clear evidence. Was the ball in his hand or on his hand when his arm went forward?

It seemed pretty clear to anyone not suffering from multiple cataracts. I was actually pissed they didn't blow that dead and let our guys get gassed running to the end zone. The ball doesn't travel in that direction at that velocity when it's fumbled.
 
I thought you had to have CLEAR evidence to overturn a call. That wasn’t clear evidence. Was the ball in his hand or on his hand when his arm went forward?
It was clear to Stevie Wonder...geez it was obvious as hell and is called as such 100% of the time.
 
It was the right call. It was clearly a pass attempt and they aren’t calling grounding because it’s impossible to discern intended receiver as he’s getting hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: upj87
this is a play that you watch and if you are a UNC fan, it very clearly shows that his arm was moving forward and if you are a pitt fan, it very clearly shows that the ball was not in control of his hand when the ball was moving forward.
 
this is a play that you watch and if you are a UNC fan, it very clearly shows that his arm was moving forward and if you are a pitt fan, it very clearly shows that the ball was not in control of his hand when the ball was moving forward.
I’m a pitt fan it was clearly a throw
 
  • Like
Reactions: buckage
this is a play that you watch and if you are a UNC fan, it very clearly shows that his arm was moving forward and if you are a pitt fan, it very clearly shows that the ball was not in control of his hand when the ball was moving forward.
100% a throw
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT