I dont know, guys. Is this separation of powers thing too old-school? Is checks and balances outdated? I'm thinking we should grant the POTUS unchecked powers to do anything he wants even if its super illegal. These judges man, they are up to no good. Let the Republican president do anything he wants to do with no check and then when the Dems win, let the Dem POTUS do anything he wants to do, no matter how crazy far-left it is? Right?
Should there be a separation of powers between the executive branch and judiciary?
- Thread starter Sean Miller Fan
- Start date
