I was
I'm curious though, how did 44,000 look at Heinz Field? Did it look any different from a Pitt game with 44K?
There are 30k fewer little girls at Pitt Football games???
I was
I'm curious though, how did 44,000 look at Heinz Field? Did it look any different from a Pitt game with 44K?
the bottom bowl is about 40k now.
But yet I play and watch a lot of golf...I enjoy it...If someone started a thread comparing golf attendance to Pitt attendance on a slow August day and how golf was boring and lame no one would even respond to it. because, well golfers and fans are not touchy...Yes, soccer takes athleticism. It gives kids who don't have the ability to play football baseball or basketball effectively something to do...that's great....but when European soccer scores are scrolling across the ESPN bottom line (year round because apparently there is no "soccer" season) and taking up valuable time and space of traditional sports I have to draw the line.....
wow, almost 80 posts for a silly soccer statement...geez, don't get me started on the craft-micro-brew beer snobs (birds of a feather with the soccer crowd in the take offense dept) .....touchy about their peach and tan bark infused suds they are....
Understand your view but as an admitted front runner fan I like to minimize (you can't totally eliminate it) the luck factor's influence in outcomes. I just perceive it to be way too important in soccer vs most popular US sports.
Oh stop it Paul. Baseball isn't really a sport, nobody watches it, and those that play it are the worst athletes on earth.
Funny thing is, who does that? Who goes to a HS soccer game between two schools you know nothing about when you don't even enjoy the sport? HS soccer is pretty bad too. It's not good soccer. Maybe that's what was implied by the people he allegedly talked to. Did he pay the PIAA inflated ticket price to get in? Did he buy a 6 pack of a microbrew that he hates before or after the game? He's from Central Pa, and my daughter played 3 state playoff games in central PA on her way to playing in the championship at Hershey. I hate to say it, but nobody was at those games because they were all neutral site games that were 3 hours away from both teams on a week night. The only people at the games were people who wanted to be there because they enjoy it. The state championship on the other hand was on a Saturday in Hershey park, so there were fan buses and a good crowd there to see both teams. But we are also talking about two of the largest schools in the state. A single A game may have been entirely different.I'm not even a beer snob but wow, you really seem like one of those miserable people who hates the world. You really go around the internet starting troll threads about beer and soccer? And upthread you actually admit going to high school soccer games and asking parents how bored they are. Do you think that's normal behavior? Is everything OK at home?
Understand your view but as an admitted front runner fan I like to minimize (you can't totally eliminate it) the luck factor's influence in outcomes. I just perceive it to be way too important in soccer vs most popular US sports.
I can understand why people don't like the luck aspect of it but its something to behold when a minnow topples a giant club in a game like this. Its part of the reason people fall in love with the sport.
It's an odd thing for me. The NHL has become unwatchable for me. Scoring this year was lower than any year in like 75 years. Stars are not allowed to be stars.
nhl needs another round of changes like last decade. Enlarging the ice takes care of most of their issues but no one listens to me. Every single casual fan watches Olympic hockey and once the Olympics are over, 90% of them quit watching. What's that tell you? On an unrelated note, soccer fans are way too sensitiveAnd if you don't like soccer because it seems scoring is luck, how can you like the NHL? NHL is way more tilted to luck than skill, buy far, unless you think that beating down the skilled stars and not calling penalties is also skill? True, stars can't be stars, they can't use their skills because they are constantly fouled and fouls aren't called. And most goals are someone throwing the puck at the net and it bounces off 3 guys and the goalie and trickles in.
Every single casual fan watches Olympic hockey and once the Olympics are over, 90% of them quit watching. What's that tell you?
Even with the luck factor, I still think the giant clubs and the best skill wins as much as in any other sport, if not, why is it always Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Netherlands, Spain etc. playing for the World Cup and why is it always Barcelona, Man U, Chelsea, Real Madrid, Bayern etc. always dominating the Club teams? Sure luck factors in, but it's like the basketball NCAAs, when you get to the Final 4, it's usually the big boys that get there with Cinderella being the exception not the rule.
Mario has been fighting this battle since the 90's, probably why he is getting out.. I agree wholeheartedly. LOL about hockey fights.. What's more boring, a hockey fight with two people trying to pull the jersey over their heads or a baseball fight with 40 players running full speed to the mound to hug each other?I always tell my hockey fan buddies that the NHL would be better if they had the bigger ice, and hired the Olympic refs to call the games like the Olympic games. They are all against it, think it would ruin it, actually care that fighting would be eliminated! LOL! I leave the room go for a beer or take a wiz when one of those boring hockey fights starts! The irony is, that Pittsburgh Penguins fans should be the 1st to advocate for Olympic style hockey and rules and officiating because they have the skill players that would benefit from it.
Baseball players are just a bunch of *ussies who can't cut it on a football field or soccer pitch. Does it surprise you that they have a hug fest at the mound?? And they really aren't athletes because they need to put a glove on their hand in order to catch a ball. Any sport that does that really isn't a sport.Mario has been fighting this battle since the 90's, probably why he is getting out.. I agree wholeheartedly. LOL about hockey fights.. What's more boring, a hockey fight with two people trying to pull the jersey over their heads or a baseball fight with 40 players running full speed to the mound to hug each other?
Even with the luck factor, I still think the giant clubs and the best skill wins as much as in any other sport, if not, why is it always Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Netherlands, Spain etc. playing for the World Cup and why is it always Barcelona, Man U, Chelsea, Real Madrid, Bayern etc. always dominating the Club teams? Sure luck factors in, but it's like the basketball NCAAs, when you get to the Final 4, it's usually the big boys that get there with Cinderella being the exception not the rule.
baseball fights are a product of ridiculous, outdated, "unwritten rules" that still exist.. Pitcher hits a batter, they have to retaliate with hitting the other team's best player.. to "send a message." Has that ever "sent a message" honestly? Or does it just mean that the original team has to hit their player? Just go round and round. And of course no one is really that mad about it, if they were they would actually fight instead of slow dance. But they have to act mad so we witness the charage of the bench clearing brawl which is nothing resembling a brawl but resembling a junior high dance with awkward teenagers slow dancing with the opposite sex..Baseball players are just a bunch of *ussies who can't cut it on a football field or soccer pitch. Does it surprise you that they have a hug fest at the mound?? And they really aren't athletes because they need to put a glove on their hand in order to catch a ball. Any sport that does that really isn't a sport.
See how that works? Sounds pretty stupid huh?? That's how the mind works for these ignorant yinzers.
Mario has been fighting this battle since the 90's, probably why he is getting out.. I agree wholeheartedly. LOL about hockey fights.. What's more boring, a hockey fight with two people trying to pull the jersey over their heads or a baseball fight with 40 players running full speed to the mound to hug each other?
How about a fight but the loser has to go to the penalty box and the winner's team gets a 2 minute power play? NHL is already niche as it is with zero chance of becoming mainstream, might as well do weird crap like that to get tv ratings past "Full House" reruns..Hockey fights are such a joke. I remember my wife saw it on TV once and asked why the refs are letting them do that and I had to explain to here that its part of the game, its payback for something else, whatever. She thought it was so weird........and she was right. Listen, if 2 guys really dont like each other that much, they should settle it like men in the parking lot after the game when someone really has the chance to get badly hurt. Punching each other while wearing skates so that you can not put as much power behind your punches and having a ref break it up after 30 seconds is not "tough" or "manly." To be honest, maybe the NHL should install an Octagon in each arena in the concourse area and after the game, the players can fight each other. I would watch that, honestly.
Yes, I totally agree! Being Greek, I have always been an Olympiakos fan, last year it was awesome when they upset Man U in the UEFA Champions League, but in the end Man U won the aggregate at home. You can watch these apparent lopsided matchups and have at least a little hope and be able to be entertained...I mean of you don't mind low scoring, lol. And the thing is, the low scoring itself is part of the fun. Often the biggest highlights are great passes where the guy then muffs the shot or the goalie makes a killer save that has everyone off their feet. Again, you have to give it a chance. It took me years, but I finally caught on.You're right and that's why college basketball and soccer are 2 of my favorite sports. You have the potential for upsets and can actually witness shocking upsets.......but then in the end, the cream rises and you get to watch some epic matches.
Yes, I totally agree! Being Greek, I have always been an Olympiakos fan, last year it was awesome when they upset Man U in the UEFA Champions League, but in the end Man U won the aggregate at home. You can watch these apparent lopsided matchups and have at least a little hope and be able to be entertained...I mean of you don't mind low scoring, lol. And the thing is, the low scoring itself is part of the fun. Often the biggest highlights are great passes where the guy then muffs the shot or the goalie makes a killer save that has everyone off their feet. Again, you have to give it a chance. It took me years, but I finally caught on.
I love the fact that the games are low scoring because every goal is so important. Its part of the fun. The build-up, the anticipation, the break-through, the celebration...........of that 1 goal. Its awesome. If you truly love a team (and really, none of us Americans really "love" any one soccer team besides maybe the USMNT), you are on pins and needles the entire 90 minutes because at any moment, the game can change with that 1 goal either way.
I love the fact that the games are low scoring because every goal is so important. Its part of the fun. The build-up, the anticipation, the break-through, the celebration...........of that 1 goal. Its awesome. If you truly love a team (and really, none of us Americans really "love" any one soccer team besides maybe the USMNT), you are on pins and needles the entire 90 minutes because at any moment, the game can change with that 1 goal either way.
This illustrates why we are all different. What you see as fun--the anticipation that a single goal can change everything is one of the major reasons soccer does so little for me. I relish my team blowing its opponent completely out with total and absolute domination on the field and on the scoreboard. I intensely dislike nail biters--especially when the team I am a fan of is involved. I have been known to turn such games off and check back later. If my team has won I watch the replay. If they have lost, I don't bother. But then, I am sure I must be weird in that regard.
The easy and quick response is that it has nothing to do with athleticism any more. Kids these days are drinking the Capri suns up to the age of 8, but continue to play the sport because it's a sport that appeals due to the growth domestically. Sure, many don't stay and move onto other sports because we have many sporting options in this country. But kids are not realizing that they can't cut it on a baseball diamond and switching to soccer. Kids aren't walking off the basketball court and onto a soccer pitch because his point guard skills lack. Those kids won't succeed at soccer either. My suburban community is large enough that we have great athletes and great programs in plenty of sports. Some choose soccer, some hockey, some baseball, some basketball, some wrestle, some play football and some play Lacrosse. I have been involved in Youth soccer for 20 years. I have yet to see one kid who wasn't good enough to play the other sports play and excel at soccer. Not one.
WOW! So you can't watch many Pitt games? How often does Pitt blow out their opponents with total and absolute domination on the field and on the scoreboard?
And you can't watch nailbiters? WOW again! Those are the games that are EASIEST to stay glued to! You are an odd sports fan, actually preferring games that are one sided over competitive games.
I don't know where you live, but I can assure you, at any school where they are not hurting for kids, a kid is not playing soccer in high school because he realizes he can't play another sport. It doesn't work that way. Soccer is a sport in which the players need to cultivate their skills from a young age on up. There are no weak/non athletic kids seeing the field. None. Try again.I can give you several in my "suburban" area that are not good enough to play any other sport. They tend to be a lot softer. You soccer people are just very touchy and cannot take anyone not understanding your boring, yes boring sport
This illustrates why we are all different. What you see as fun--the anticipation that a single goal can change everything is one of the major reasons soccer does so little for me. I relish my team blowing its opponent completely out with total and absolute domination on the field and on the scoreboard. I intensely dislike nail biters--especially when the team I am a fan of is involved. I have been known to turn such games off and check back later. If my team has won I watch the replay. If they have lost, I don't bother. But then, I am sure I must be weird in that regard.
Another thing...football is my favorite sport. It is for most of us. That's why we are on this board. However...
At my HS, which is a top 10 WPIAL enrollment school, the football coaches look out at the soccer team and droll over some the athletes. They certainly wish that they had some of them on the football team and they do not understand why they don't. In addition, there are cases where the football coaches look at the band and see a couple kids and wonder how they can get them to come out for the football team. And yes, I SAID THE BAND. I can assure you that the HS soccer coach has no interest in any of the football players, and he certainly has no interest in the band.
Kids are not playing soccer because they couldn't cut it in football. Not at North Allegheny, not at Central Catholic. Not at Penn Trafford. And not at Upper St Clair.