I left out nothing. You said "being "efficient" is a useless stat as well if you do not win the game." I pointed out the fact, and it is a fact that "if you are the more efficient team in the game you will win every single time. Kind of by definition."
YOU were referring to winning the game. Not all games, not conference games, THE GAME. When you are referring to any specific game the team that is more efficient wins, every single time. That's why basketball coaches and people who understand basketball look at efficiency numbers and not raw points per game as you seem to think is important. You can now deflect or talk around it all you want, but it is pretty clear that you don't have any sort of real understanding as to what wins basketball games.
And for the record, in the spirit of trying to help you understand, the reason that Pitt's record wasn't better even though it's offense was relatively efficient was because the defense was not. You do understand that there are two sides to the game, right? You do understand that you can have a pretty good offense and not win a lot of games because you have a bad defense, right? Or conversely you could be a pretty poor offense but if you play defense well enough you can still win too. You understand that when someone tells you that a team has a good or great or poor or whatever offense that they are only giving you half of the picture right? And without the other half you don't have the whole story, right?
