Re: Thumbs up Owtie!!
What Pitt is going through currently is not all that out of character for comparable teams around the country. It is certainly not a positive thing, but it is also not the end of the world like some are making it out to be.
A year ago Pitt was playing in the ACC semi-finals and our fans thought they had a pretty decent chance against UVa and we only lost by 3. Nobody was using that as a datapoint in a multi-year trend analysis. Even against #1 overall Florida, we thought Pitt had a chance for an upset.
Just like people are disappointed by Pitt "underperforming" in the NCAA tournament, Pitt fans are now disappointed in not getting a #1 seed every couple years. What Pitt had done 2008-2011 was probably a bit of an overachievement. As you said, how often does anyone in any program do that? The past few years have been a bit of an underachievement, but that doesn't mean it will be that way forever. Dixon will be given the time to prove whether this is a 4-year blip or the beginning of the end. I honestly don't know how anyone could reach that conclusion based on evidence to date.
Can anyone really argue that Ben Howland is not a good coach after 3 Final Fours? UCLA still decided to part ways. Dixon has accomplished enough over his career that someone will be paying him a lot of money to coach basketball. Time will tell whether that someone is Pitt, or like Howland, he'll find another home.
The problem of identifying a "trend" is also identifying all the other data you are comparing to. You mentioned Wisconsin as an example of a team that has excelled, but one could also point to WVU falling on its face after a Final Four run, or Villanova having a rough stretch also. Both of which are programs who have since rebounded nicely.Originally posted by recruitsreadtheseboards:
An honest assessment? I think the above of what we are and what we have (had) is a pretty damn honest assessment. AND.....at one point, we were a #1 seed in 2 out of 3 years. How many other programs actually reach that level of success? And we have totally whiffed on building on this "blueblood" like success.
We just seem to want to make and accept excuses without admitting the obvious. That perhaps, Jamie has grown stale here
What Pitt is going through currently is not all that out of character for comparable teams around the country. It is certainly not a positive thing, but it is also not the end of the world like some are making it out to be.
A year ago Pitt was playing in the ACC semi-finals and our fans thought they had a pretty decent chance against UVa and we only lost by 3. Nobody was using that as a datapoint in a multi-year trend analysis. Even against #1 overall Florida, we thought Pitt had a chance for an upset.
Just like people are disappointed by Pitt "underperforming" in the NCAA tournament, Pitt fans are now disappointed in not getting a #1 seed every couple years. What Pitt had done 2008-2011 was probably a bit of an overachievement. As you said, how often does anyone in any program do that? The past few years have been a bit of an underachievement, but that doesn't mean it will be that way forever. Dixon will be given the time to prove whether this is a 4-year blip or the beginning of the end. I honestly don't know how anyone could reach that conclusion based on evidence to date.
Can anyone really argue that Ben Howland is not a good coach after 3 Final Fours? UCLA still decided to part ways. Dixon has accomplished enough over his career that someone will be paying him a lot of money to coach basketball. Time will tell whether that someone is Pitt, or like Howland, he'll find another home.